Jump to content

The beginning of the end for PPC? (The Soundbooth saga)


Swad

Adobe announced last week the beta of Soundbooth, an audio editing app from the company who seems to have its hand in every media-related cookie jar. Mac fans, however, weren't too happy with a little caveat to the application: it will only run on Intel Macs. PowerPC support, it seems, is slowly going the way of the buffalo.

 

Macintouch (a site to which I would normally link at this point if it didn't have the worst web-based interface on the planet) seemed to lead the charge against Adobe, claiming that they had abandoned the PPC users.

 

John Nack, Adobe's Photoshop product manager, had this to say:

Now, if you were Adobe and had started developing a new application at exactly the time when Apple told you, "This other chip architecture is dead to us," would you rather put your efforts into developing for that platform, or would you focus elsewhere?

 

This logic seems lost on a lot of online posters, who leap to some fairly outlandish conclusions. "Oh my God, next thing you know, Photoshop and the other apps won't run on PowerPC, and the next thing you know, they'll kill Mac versions altogether and just tell us to run Windows using Parallels!" At what point Adobe will burn Snuggle the Fabric Softener Bear in some dark pagan ritual isn't specified, but that must be the natural next step, right??

 

I have to ask myself, Why on earth am I devoting part of my weekend to writing all this? Why not blow it off and get out of the house? Maybe I should, but as a die-hard Mac user I feel like someone has to speak a little truth to the Mac community--or rather, to that vocal little group of zealots and forum trolls. So here's my message for those folks: You're hurting the Mac platform. You're hurting the Mac community. You need to crush a little aluminum foil against those antennae of yours, because you're hurting everyone concerned. You're making it harder (and less appealing) for people of goodwill to make the effort to support the Mac.

The man has a point.

 

I doubt that this would be much of an issue had Adobe been responsible, over the past year, in getting Intel versions of their apps out the door. I've heard their excuses and, although reasonable, they're still lacking. If Adobe wants to be choosy with their architecture support, that's fine... just find a position and stick with it. Snubbing both Intel and PPC users is never good for customer relations.

 

The true question, though, is this: are we seeing the beginning of a trend?


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



The REAL bottomline of this is ADOBE doesn't care for Macs anymore.

 

They arent driving Macs sales

 

they arent creating new software on mac first

 

They arent supporting the latest of Macs

 

 

The reallity is .. Adobe loves windows....

 

So Apple need to come and save the day with another FCP photoretouch equivalent product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait until you get proven wrong, and almost all the developers follow suit in this.

 

Apple's not going to complain whatsoever, either.

 

I will be proven wrong...in a couple of years. And then you'll come back to gloat and say I was wrong...in a couple of years. Well, I will be wrong...in a couple of years and I'll be one of the first to come back on and discuss the pros and cons of such a thing...in a couple of years.

 

Will Apple complain about Adobe releasing something Intel only? Not publicly, but I bet there are some private discussions going on. Will others follow suit? Well, there is an active Intel development group, but they seem to be working more on problems arising from the Intel processors themselves rather than developing Intel specific applications that would be the envy of us PPC users. There is also Parallels, but that needs the specifics of Intel processors to work, so I tend to not count something that needs something that PPC cannot supply (others would count it, so it's a matter of personal opinion with this one).

 

Developers will only support Intel when they are either ready to do it or Apple forces the issue by no longer actively supporting Universal Applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I'd say what the hell. Let Adobe do their thing. If that turns out to be a huge mistake let them deal with it. Who cares?

 

It's just so strange. On one hand they can't come up with the proper UB for it's graphics-flagship while on the other hand they'd cease all PPC development on cornering (or trying at least) another market. The really weird thing is that on the performance curve it are the GFX-ppl who'd die for a faster Intel-coded binary while on the SFX-front ppl still are very happy with their PPC machines (or so it seems). :P

 

The world is indeed turned upside down. Every suit proclaiming stuff like "customer demand" and then you see this kind of stupidity.

 

We're doomed! :dev:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the precise reason it is at the core of Microsoft's Xbox 360, Sony's PlayStation 3, AND Nintendo's Wii.

 

I didn't do any math or anything, but I'm sure that most Macs that get used these days are STILL PPC Macs, simply because they were built more carefully from the ground up with quality in mind (this is the software difference between the Windows world and pretty much everything else; the former is based on more rapid development than everything else). Older Macs are still quite usable.

 

Give me the "PPC is dead" BS, and I'll give you a PowerBook G3 to the face.

 

That last sentence is a funny reference to something that doesn't exist anywhere but in my head.

 

 

give me a G3 to the face, if ppc is so alive and well, then why DOESNT APPLE MAKE THEM ANY MORE sure alot of people still own them, but you realize that apple would love to kill of ppc because THEN YOU WOULD HAVE TO BUY A NEW x86 MAC just think about that for a minute or two.... and lol, sorry BRP, just read the last sentince :) lol, but im still posting this because it does have a decent point i guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what he meant was that Macs with PPC chips still are a great value over Intel based Macs because of how well an older machine can run OS X.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...