Jump to content

Boot Camp or Enemy Action? What The Beta Means.


Swad

Apple today launched a shot across Microsoft’s bow with Boot Camp, the beta version of its solution to let Mac users boot Windows on their Macintels. While at first I thought I could see Steve Ballmer throwing a chair across the room at the news, I realized that with Apple’s semi-cozy relationship with Microsoft, this news isn’t likely to be a surprise to any of the major players. (There have been rumors in the past of a tacit OS agreement between the two companies) As Apple continues to regain market share against PCs, I doubt they want to risk an all-out war with Windows.

 

But why should there be a conflict anyway? Microsoft ships more units of XP and, at some unforeseen date, Vista. Apple picks up new customers who would love to move a Mac but can’t leave Windows behind for various reasons. It seems like a win-win situation for all.

 

Apple’s move also answers those who continue to ask why anyone would want Windows on their Mac. Why? Because it’s possible. Because, for the corporate environment, it makes business sense. And because now it’s simple.

 

But there are larger implications for the announcement of Boot Camp. The largest is that it marks Apple’s first true strategic use of the switch to Intel. EFI was a smart move and the speed benefits are obviously nice, but the ability to dual boot Windows (and - likely - use it within OS X in Leopard via virtualization) is probably the trump card Apple was waiting to use. If they can get PC users to buy a Mac to use both operating systems, they’re betting that eventually those “switchers” will rely solely on OS X. But even if they don’t, another Mac has been sold.

 

Should Microsoft be concerned? Maybe. But in the mean time, I have the feeling it’ll be a lot more acceptable to be toting a MacBook Pro around Redmond.

 

[Digg it!].


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Those are clearly faked shots.

 

1) The text mode stuff appears at 1:1 resolution on the screen - it is not stretched to fill the screen.

 

2) The power LED on the iMac is not even illuminated...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they updated their firmware like they were supposed too.. BSOD's are almost always faulty drivers/bad hardware

but since this is apple changing out the hardware isn't an option :)

 

or.. maybe the drivers apple wants you to install IS causing this. has anyone heard of people getting BSOD's with the contest winners' method?

 

edit: upon closer inspection.. thos shots do look a little shopped...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are clearly faked shots.

 

1) The text mode stuff appears at 1:1 resolution on the screen - it is not stretched to fill the screen.

 

2) The power LED on the iMac is not even illuminated...

 

Actually i blue screened my macbook and it did stretch to fit the entire screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are clearly faked shots.

 

1) The text mode stuff appears at 1:1 resolution on the screen - it is not stretched to fill the screen.

 

Yes, it is streched.

 

2) The power LED on the iMac is not even illuminated...

 

Windows doesn't have a driver to control the LED. The LED isn't lit in Mac OS normally either unless the machine is asleep or the screen is off. For Windows, the LED only lights up during standby, not even when the LCD is off.

 

Why the hell would anyone call that fake? That's just retarded. It's not hard to BSOD Windows. In the past it wasn't hard to kernel panic Mac OS either, if you knew what bugs to exploit (i.e., copy a folder inside of itself -- fixed in a certain Jaguar point release, and raiding dmg files in disk utility, also fixed at some point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can buy two computers comparable to the Mac mini for only $595? Where?

 

My pc cost me AU$1100 (see specs in sig)

 

cheapest powermac = AU$3,199.00 (almost 3 times the price of my PC)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My pc cost me AU$1100 (see specs in sig)

 

cheapest powermac = AU$3,199.00 (almost 3 times the price of my PC)

 

No, the challenge is to come up with two systems comparable to one Mac mini.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok was tough and im prob goign to get pulled apart for it and am sure to have made some errors :P however here goes (all prices are in AU$)

 

gigabyte K8VM800m $59

AMD sempron 2800+ $108

512mb DDR $48

D-Link wireless NIC $37

WD 8mb 80gig HD $71

128mb gigabyte nvidia 5200 $45

dual layer DVD combo drive $55

gigabyte GZ-XCCL $75

Your choice of linux or Mac OS X ( ;) )

 

Total: $498

 

 

all quoted from msy.com.au

 

This compared to the cheapest mac mini (AU$999) has the following pros/cons

 

Cons

- DDR memory instead of DDR2

- no operating system (legal issue)

- 10/100 LAN not gigabit

- larger less pretty case (debatable)

- build it yourself

- no remote

- mac mini more sexc (debatable)

- no bluetooth

- not OS X (debatable)

 

Pros

- half the price (get one for your girlfreind)

- faster graphics card with dedicated memory

- DVD/DVD-WR read/burn CD/CD-RW read/burn

- room for expansion

- 20 GB more hard drive

 

prob more cons/pros but yeh im over it :P

 

im not a mac hater mind you. Given the choice id go buy a mac right now especially with boot camp coming out. However lack of funds has always taken that choice away :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...