Jump to content

Attack of the Clones!


sHARD>>

The Empire strikes back? It's been 9 years since the “death” of the Macintosh clones, but apparently they can't be killed. After seeing OSx86 for sale in Bangkok, it was only a matter of time before commercial pirates moved to the "hard" stuff. If Apple makes the big money on hardware, why shouldn't illegal cloners do too? Apparently they've caught on, selling such items as the "PowerPC G6 Macintosh", an "Apple G6 Macintosh-Clone Computer" with a 3.8GHz Pentium 4. Along with the fancy OSx86 compatible hardware, it comes pre-loaded with something the seller likes to call "Mac OSX-86 Apple MacOS X Tiger 10.4.3". A “low, low” price of $500 ensures plenty of sales.

 

What's interesting to note here, beside the blatant disregard for copyright, trademark, and patent law, is the homegrown nature of these operations. What once was the domain of small South American and Chinese factories is now the realm of home PC builders. This represents quite a shift from the old business model, and it's probably time Apple started worrying about it. With the simplicity and anonymity of the internet, operations are here and gone in a few days. There's the potential to sell thousands.

 

As you may notice, we refrain from linking to this material as we continue on our mission to prevent piracy. Clones represent the worst of theft, giving their perpetrators thousands in undue monetary gain. Rest assured, suppliers are out there.

 

All this leaves us with an important question: When Steve Jobs first re-joined Apple, the clones were dead. When will we see a return of the jedi?


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Will people buy it though? It is not the easiest thing to get going and the people who can get it going already have beacuse they are real interested in getting it done themselves, on hardware they can trust, beacuse they owned it running Windows...

 

I'm not sure that this is a big deal for Apple - the ipod generation of Apple users want the styled machines - the people who want OSX86 build it themselves. I see it posing zero threat to Jobs and his team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will people buy it though? It is not the easiest thing to get going and the people who can get it going already have beacuse they are real interested in getting it done themselves, on hardware they can trust, beacuse they owned it running Windows...

 

I'm not sure that this is a big deal for Apple - the ipod generation of Apple users want the styled machines - the people who want OSX86 build it themselves. I see it posing zero threat to Jobs and his team.

 

Clones could grow into something more, and they are easy to get up and use. This machine comes pre-loaded with the OS, and if it also had a pre-cracked DVD, you wouldn't even notice any problems if you had to reinstall. Quite easy once you have the right hardware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TApparently they've caught on, selling such items as the "PowerPC G6 Macintosh", an "Apple G6 Macintosh-Clone Computer" with a 3.8GHz Pentium 4. Along with the fancy OSx86 compatible hardware, it comes pre-loaded with something the seller likes to call "Mac OSX-86 Apple MacOS X Tiger 10.4.3". A “low, low” price of $500 ensures plenty of sales.

 

So a PowerPC G6 is a 3.8GHz Pentium 4? Now that's great marketing. :)

 

Do you have links (or pics) for any of this stuff?

 

EDIT: I missed this part in Shard's story:

As you may notice, we refrain from linking to this material as we continue on our mission to prevent piracy.

 

At $500 they must be overclocking the Pentium 4, right? I wonder what motherboard they using.

 

All this leaves us with an important question: When Steve Jobs first re-joined Apple, the clones were dead. When will we see a return of the jedi?

 

I continue to think that is inevitable that OS X will be licensed for non-Apple hardware, perhaps starting with some Dell and HP clone programs. But that may be a few years off as the x86 transitions is just getting started, x86 Macs have only been publicaly avaible for a few months. Furthermore, Apple has to be careful not to kill off it's own hardware sales by licensing OS X and somehow get crushed by Microsoft in retaliation, so I think they may avoid cloning while the company is doing so well with iPods, OS X, Apple Stores and next Intel's new chips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this will be interresting. Apple strikes back or it´s true - I don´t think so, fake alert! Company expansion could be the answer. They do more profit with iPods and iTunes as with Macs... Let´s see what happens.

 

If you want to see pictures and read infos about the "PowerPC G6 Macintosh" just google for it! However, for me it looks more like a evil fake as a deal to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is just bad. inevitable.. yes. but just bad.

 

Apple may let *some things* slide.. but I can't see Jobs letting this one go. Unfortunately it has the downside of looking bad upon us as well... since in the eyes of Apple we are part of the reason this became possible.

 

I smell a backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These generic mac "clones" running OS X 86 are mostly sold in poor countries in South America and in China where Apple barely even has a presence. Nobody in the U.S. is gonna be buying these machines. This could be something good for Apple because it would start to make a name for them in countries where currently nobody knows what Mac OS X is. Apple won't be losing money since they are not loosing sales, since sales for them in these places are so reduced. At least in South America, the only people that buy Macs are the very rich and they will probably continue buying supported Apple hardware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a PowerPC G6 is a 3.8GHz Pentium 4? Now that's great marketing. :(

 

Do you have links (or pics) for any of this stuff?

 

At $500 they most be overclocking the Pentium 4, right? I wonder what motherboard they using.

I continue to think that is inevitable that OS X will be licensed for non-Apple hardware, perhaps starting with some Dell and HP clone programs. But that may be a few years off as the x86 transitions is just getting started, x86 Macs have only been publicaly avaible for a few months. Furthermore, Apple has to be careful not to kill off it's own hardware sales by licensing OS X and somehow get crushed by Microsoft in retaliation, so I think they may avoid cloning while the company is doing so well with iPods, OS X, Apple Stores and next Intel's new chips.

 

 

hi bofor, re; the link and the pics... this is posted at laughs section http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/10895402/Po..._Macintosh.html

 

specs look real and osx86 compi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you may notice, we refrain from linking to this material as we continue on our mission to prevent piracy. Clones represent the worst of theft, giving their perpetrators thousands in undue monetary gain. Rest assured, suppliers are out there.

 

{censored}. The COURTS RULED that clones are LEGAL. I can build a clone and sell it if I want. Apple only wants to lock their OS so that they can maintain their willful violations of Anti-Trust laws. When they release the install DVD for sale (and they will) then everyone can 'legally' install the OS. I have already sold many clones to friends and neighbors. When they legally release their OS, then they can't stop anyone without doing something illegal.

 

I for one would like to see legislation outlawing TPM chips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The COURTS RULED that clones are LEGAL. I can build a clone and sell it if I want.

 

I agree that simply hardware clones are legal per se as long as they do not copy ROM's or firware outright (reverse-engineering is legal). However, selling them with bootlegged software is not.

 

These guys are not stopping with OS X either:

 

Operating System: Mac OSX-86 Apple MacOS X Tiger 10.4.3 
Software: Office2004 & PhotoShop9 CS2

 

I can not believe they are listing a US business address. Apple Legal is going to be all over these guys pronto.

 

When they release the install DVD for sale (and they will) then everyone can 'legally' install the OS.

 

I also agree with this. EULA and the Courts upholding them are full of {censored}. Retail sales are simply not applicable to unilateral contractual licensing agreements. If you purchase software retail, you have the right to use it anyway you wish (short of violating copyright), just like anything else you buy over-the-counter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn, the case looks like one I can get for $10 at Fry's.

 

Now if they had taken time and effort to make it look like a real Macintosh by custom-fabricating lookalike cases, like this guy, then it might be interesting. It's just another whitebox being sold under an Engrish name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn, the case looks like one I can get for $10 at Fry's.

 

Yes, the case is tacky but it is supposedly aluminum. I am kind of surprised of the overall quality of the parts they used:

 

250GB Maxtor NCQ 16MB 7200RPM SATAII-300

Pioneer DVR-110D

Thermaltake CL-P0071 Ultra-Quiet 120mm Copper CPU Cooler

apparently some Intel 915GV motherboard with a GMA 900?

and apparently Intel Pentium 4 670 (3.8 GHz)?

 

I really do not see how they are able to sell this all for $499, this is looking just to good to be true.

 

The best price I see for the Intel Pentium 4 670 (3.8 GHz) is $610:

 

http://www.pricegrabber.com/p__Intel_Penti...intel+670/skd=1

 

Now if they had taken time and effort to make it look like a real Macintosh by custom-fabricating lookalike cases, like this guy, then it might be interesting.

 

How about this this Lian Li:

 

11-112-081-01.JPG

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16811112081

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they release the install DVD for sale (and they will) then everyone can 'legally' install the OS.

 

I would like to make note of the big when there. Until the proprietary OS is gone, clones are completely illegal. That's why the original clones were. No court ever ruled that copies of illegal software (formally ROMs, now just the OS) could be freely sold. The only legal clones were those licensed by Apple. Until Apple licenses the OS for resale by vendors, any clone pre-loaded with the operating system will be completely illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the case is tacky but it is supposedly aluminum. I am kind of surprised of the overall quality of the parts they used:

 

250GB Maxtor NCQ 16MB 7200RPM SATAII-300

Pioneer DVR-110D

Thermaltake CL-P0071 Ultra-Quiet 120mm Copper CPU Cooler

apparently some Intel 915GV motherboard with a GMA 900?

and apparently Intel Pentium 4 670 (3.8 GHz)?

 

I really do not see how they are able to sell this all for $499, this is looking just to good to be true.

 

The best price I see for the Intel Pentium 4 670 (3.8 GHz) is $610:

 

http://www.pricegrabber.com/p__Intel_Penti...intel+670/skd=1

How about this this Lian Li:

 

11-112-081-01.JPG

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16811112081

 

The Lian Li V600A would suit it better:

 

11-112-505-02.JPG

 

11-112-505-03.JPG

 

11-112-505-04.JPG

 

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lian Li V600A would suit it better:

 

Yes, I was looking at that case a while ago. It is too bad they put the "front" IO ports on the top of the case. Likewise, I would rather have the exhaust blown out the back not the side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until Apple licenses the OS for resale by vendors, any clone pre-loaded with the operating system will be completely illegal.

 

Not necessarily, some jurisdictions certainly may rule that it is perfectly legal to sell a clone with a pre-installed copy of OS X so long as it is lawfully acquired.

 

Furthermore, given the vast diversity of jurisdicitons, we should expect the small-scale sale of illegal Mac clones to be common. It is easy to build illegal OSx86 boxes and lots of people are certainly willing to buy them. I think it will be just too difficult for Apple to take everyone to court who want to make a buck off this stuff, especially outside Western countries like the USA, say like Russia, China, Brazil and the Philippines.

 

Ultimately, Apple may simply be forced to go after the full-blown OS X pirates and ignore the EULA-breaking cloners. This is one scenerio that could lead Apple to sell OS X for general use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best price I see for the Intel Pentium 4 670 (3.8 GHz) is $610:

 

I think the CPU they are using is an overclocked Celeron. see: "284KB Memory On-Chip" in the description. The Celeron has 256K L2, + 12K instruction cache + 16K data cache = 284K total.

 

If they can steal the OS they’re selling on it, why would they be honest about any other part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the CPU they are using is an overclocked Celeron. see: "284KB Memory On-Chip" in the description. The Celeron has 256K L2, + 12K instruction cache + 16K data cache = 284K total.

 

Good point, I missed the cache discrepancy.

 

Does anyone have any ideas about which motherboard they are using? Perhaps some 915 chipset with GMA 900 (note that this is what their "Intel Extreme 3" appears to be), Realtek ALC850 audio, and overclocking features? Or is it possible to overclock Celerons with a regular Intel-like motherboard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the nature of this site, it's somewhat hypocritical to denounce the operations of the third world cloners. The only difference between their customers and most of the people on this site is that we built our own machine and installed the OS. So if you think about it, their customers are really only paying for the service of not having to go through the hassle of installing the OS and building the machine themselves.

 

Also:

 

I doubt that many 3rd world people were buying macs over pcs due to cost issues. Therefore each of these mac clone sales are likely impacting pirated Windows sales more than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the nature of this site, it's somewhat hypocritical to denounce the operations of the third world cloners. The only difference between their customers and most of the people on this site is that we built our own machine and installed the OS. So if you think about it, their customers are really only paying for the service of not having to go through the hassle of installing the OS and building the machine themselves.

 

Also:

 

I doubt that many 3rd world people were buying macs over pcs due to cost issues. Therefore each of these mac clone sales are likely impacting pirated Windows sales more than anything.

 

 

amen...

 

is funny to see a website like this one say no to pirate stuff but supports a pirated o.s?

remember guys os x was and as far as we can see will not be released on windows hardware.

 

:) love this site but their whole view on pirate apps is amazing...

if it wasnt for a pirated version of os x this site woulndt exist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until Apple licenses the OS for resale by vendors, any clone pre-loaded with the operating system will be completely illegal.

 

If I buy it I will install it on what I want and sell it to who I want. Apple can't do anything about that. They may not like it, but thats just tough {censored} for them.

 

Personally, I say more power to the guy. Hes doing what nobody here has the balls to do, or at least admit they do it.

 

:) love this site but their whole view on pirate apps is amazing...

if it wasnt for a pirated version of os x this site woulndt exist

 

Ive been saying this for a while. I am a software pirate, and I support piracy. But nobody here does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

love this site but their whole view on pirate apps is amazing...

if it wasnt for a pirated version of os x this site woulndt exist

 

 

First off, if someone legitimately owns a license for OSX-Intel (only way at the moment if by purchasing an Intel-Mac), depending on the laws of their country, it could be perfectly legal for them to install that OS on another machine they own - be it Apple or not.

 

However, I think you'd be hard pressed to find a country that would allow copying and re-distributing that OS for a fee without the permission of the copy write holder.

 

For those that are bound by the laws of the US; if you can't see the difference between piracy for personal use and piracy for profit, regardless of what the law says on the issue, then you probably have other issues as well -- like pushing a death penalty for jaywalking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...