Jump to content

Rosetta and Driver Upgrades; New Build is Leaked

Swad

By Swad,
in Front Page News and Rumors

 Share
206 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Tak
Tak
Posted
Posted
What ATI cards are supported? I checked the site and noe of the FAQ's have been updated yet.

 

http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/HCL_10.4.3

 

http://forum.osx86project.org/index.php?showtopic=4301 (end of thread)

 

http://www.win2osx.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1665

 

 

 

 

 

can someone please post the ati drivers... i dont want to get the new build a i have 10.4.1 with the 10.4.3 framework working perfectly

 

The 10.4.3 drivers will not work on the 10.4.1 kernel. You need the full 10.4.3 if you want the new ATi support.

 

I have 8F1099 and can post it, but where are they located ?

 

Essentials.pkg

 

But as I say, it's pointless trying to use them on 10.4.1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stormin
stormin
Posted
Posted

i am a little confused and seeking some help. i installed the deadmoo on a vmware partition with little problems. i installed the changes from maxxus and dd'd the image to another drive. this drive booted without a hitch on a thinkpad T30 and a hp pavilion zt3000. i tried to install from the cd for 1099 with no luck. i just completed a download of 1111 and i am anxious to help out with some of the porting stuff. i have read the stuff for 1111 and maxxus working on the changes to make a bootable cd image. i was wondering if it is possible to mount my drive from the laptop to my g5 through usb and copy off the stuff from the dmg? once this is done i want to find out what it would take to setup the drivers to support my 1920x1200 resolution. i would be very grateful to anyone who could assist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeathChill
DeathChill
Posted
Posted
So what is the deal with Rossetta supporting Altivec now? Is this unconfirmed or what?

 

Is anybody else surprised to see Apple trying to do this?

My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
enb14
enb14
Posted
Posted
My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

 

 

Can you verify if 8f1111A could be an internal MAC release?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VasH
VasH
Posted
Posted
Here's the ATI Radeon 9700 drivers from 8f1111. [Removed for DMCA compliance]

 

 

HI

Can you post the driver for radeon 9800 too?

I have updated the 10.4.1 to the 10.4.3 and then I've deleted all the ati*.kext file and put the ati.kext from jas. But I think I have made a big mistake doing this. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roach Commuter
Roach Commuter
Posted
Posted

I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

 

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ZX2C4
ZX2C4
Posted
Posted
I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

 

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

 

How did you go about installing 8f111 with those old patches? I have the dmg file... what do I do from there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tetubleu
tetubleu
Posted
Posted
I've been testing 8F1111 with Maxxus's patched oah750 and oah750d taken from build 8F1099.

 

My impression is : It looks stable, however, iTunes won't start up (it pops up an 'unknown error -50' message) and several x86 applications (not the ones bundled with the OS) crash unexpectedly due to

BAD_INSTRUCTION or BAD_ACCESS followed by a hex digit. (At least that's what it says in the CrashReporter). Anybody experiencing the same problems ?

 

I know why... You didn't install your OS in english :)

 

If you read the informations of the file "iTunes" in the folder applications, go to langages and uncheck all of the langages, and just keep english.

 

Then iTunes will work :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roach Commuter
Roach Commuter
Posted
Posted
I know why... You didn't install your OS in english :D

 

If you read the informations of the file "iTunes" in the folder applications, go to langages and uncheck all of the langages, and just keep english.

 

Then iTunes will work :(

 

Thank you very much Tetu! Infact I installed OSX in a language different from english.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bofors
bofors
Posted
Posted
My developer said that he tested Altivec apps and they did not run with Altivec and XBench didn't show any improvements while running in Rosetta in the Altivec portion of the test. So basically someone made up a HUGE hoax that Rosetta supported Altivec, which means no it's not true.

 

Well this certainly makes more sense to me than Rosetta supporting Altivec. Do to the fact that Atlivec beats the {censored} out of SSE3, it really makes no sense to emulate it and that logic likely applies to automatic translation as well. Furthermore, Apple had seemed to make it clear that Altivec was dead as far as OS X is concerned and otherwise only G3 emulation by Rosseta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darrob
darrob
Posted
Posted

:blink: Hi all. I've been reading, with growing envy and frustration, everyones trials a successes with OSx86.

I wanna try it too :( any kind soul out there willing to give me an invite to demonoid so that I can play as well?

 

Thanks

 

Darrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darrob
darrob
Posted
Posted
:blink: Hi all. I've been reading, with growing envy and frustration, everyones trials a successes with OSx86.

I wanna try it too :( any kind soul out there willing to give me an invite to demonoid so that I can play as well?

 

Thanks

 

Darrin

 

:( Oops no contact - darrinrobert@hotmail.com - that should help

Link to comment
Share on other sites
os_overload
os_overload
Posted
Posted

ya, patching 1111 directly after converting it makes it unbootable. vmware gives this error in debug mode:

*** VMware Workstation internal monitor error ***

vcpu-0:ASSERT vmcore/vmm/cpu/segment.h:444 bugNr=19580

There is a problem in this version of VMware Workstation.

We rely on your feedback to improve the quality of our product. Please submit a support request that describes the problem at our Web page "http://www.vmware.com/info?id=8". Do not forget to attach the log file (C:\...\My Documents\My Virtual Machines\Other -macosx\vmware.log) and the core file (C:\...\My Documents\My Virtual Machines\Other -macosx\vmware-core.gz).

To collect files to submit to VMware support, run vm-support.vbs.

We appreciate your feedback,

-- the VMware Workstation team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...