jfpoole Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Hi folks, I'm John, the developer behind Geekbench. I thought I'd let y'all know that there's a new version of Geekbench available. I think Geekbench 2.0 is a huge improvement over Geekbench 2006, and I hope you'll think so, too. You can download both the Mac OS X and Windows versions of Geekbench 2.0 from the Geekbench website. If you've got any questions, please let me know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Awesome work, jfpoole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 (edited) Let's see how well my X86 system performs.... This is what I get for having a hackintosh: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/95 Edited March 6, 2007 by Ramm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Baron Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Let's see how well my X86 system performs.... This is what I get for having a hackintosh: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/95 And mine.... http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/103 Not bad for a Celeron! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 My iBook G3's, my MacBook's, and my AMD box's ratings. http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiendskull9 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/119 damn colonel and his bangin machines colonels are made for chicken making! not geekbenching! -clay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac-mini Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 (edited) let me get mine while i'm waiting for my serial number EDIT: where is linux? Edited March 6, 2007 by mac-mini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I've created a patch that will allow Geekbench to run on 10.3.x-based Macs. More info and a download link are on my blog. http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?aut...p;showentry=232 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erbic Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 (edited) Higher is better, right? I got around 3K on my Macbook Pro, but I can't remember the submitted result number. Let me re-run it... EDIT: Here it is.... 3062. http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/129 Edited March 7, 2007 by ErBiC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I wonder how a Quad 3.0 ghz Mac Pro with an nVidia Quadro FX and 16 gb of ram scores... Prediction: 6000+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soündless Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 lets find out, who wants to start a donation thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it. I'll post my new geekbench when i get home, as usual, i expect myself to pwn everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfpoole Posted March 7, 2007 Author Share Posted March 7, 2007 As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it. I really think that as the developer behind Geekbench, I should be the one that gets the system. Speaking of scores, you can view my Geekbench scores here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tops Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 My GeekBench Score Might I ask, what is LU Composition, and why did I score so terribly low on it? Hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mifki Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/44 /me does a little dance Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_muad_dib Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 does it work on a PIII 500 mhz? that's what i have here at work Platform: Windows x86 (32-bit) Compiler: Visual C++ 2005 Operating System: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Model: IBM 6893520 Motherboard: IBM 6893520 Processor: Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 7 Stepping 3 Logical Processors: 1 Physical Processors: 1 Processor Frequency: 497 MHz L1 Instruction Cache: 0.00 B L1 Data Cache: 0.00 B L2 Cache: 512 KB L3 Cache: 0.00 B Bus Frequency: 100.0 MHz Memory: 320 MB Memory Type: SDRAM 10 MHz SIMD: 1 Integer (Score: 316) Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 269, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 946.4 KB/sec Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 278, 1.0, 935.1 KB/sec Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 320, 1.0, 1.32 MB/sec Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 325, 1.0, 1.30 MB/sec Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 328, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 306, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 315, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 319, 1.0, 161.3 Knodes/sec Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 330, 1.0, 160.3 Knodes/sec Lua single-threaded scalar -- 370, 1.0, 142.6 Knodes/sec Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 369, 1.0, 142.2 Knodes/sec Floating Point (Score: 300) Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 214.4 Mflops Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 327, 1.0, 214.3 Mflops Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 238, 1.0, 115.4 Mflops Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 254, 1.0, 116.0 Mflops Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 361, 3.8, 432.8 Mflops Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 426, 3.8, 443.8 Mflops LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 176, 1.0, 157.4 Mflops LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 177, 1.0, 155.6 Mflops Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 213, 1.0, 31.9 Mflops Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 170, 1.0, 31.6 Mflops Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 183, 1.0, 427.5 Kpixels/sec Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 184, 1.0, 425.8 Kpixels/sec Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 464.8 Kpixels/sec Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 462.0 Kpixels/sec Memory (Score: 201) Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 221, 1.0, 278.3 MB/sec Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 289, 1.0, 203.1 MB/sec Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 252, 1.0, 941.5 Kallocs/sec Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 102, 1.0, 216.7 MB/sec Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 143, 1.0, 151.6 MB/sec Stream (Score: 187) Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 147, 1.0, 206.1 MB/sec Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 236, 1.5, 314.3 MB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 150, 1.0, 199.8 MB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 216, 1.5, 299.3 MB/sec Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 156, 1.0, 241.8 MB/sec Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 242, 1.4, 346.0 MB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 172, 1.0, 243.8 MB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 181, 1.4, 348.2 MB/sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiaboliK Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/36 so far thats just my 915gux dev kit clone. my c2d cube gets 2646, but i have got to get the airport connected again (may be my u.fl connectors ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfpoole Posted March 7, 2007 Author Share Posted March 7, 2007 Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works? There is a 64-bit version in the works, and it'll be made available around the time Leopard is released (it'll be Leopard-only, too, given the 64-bit limitations present in Tiger). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adriandkicks Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 (edited) http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/225 Thats for the system in my sig Edited March 8, 2007 by adriandkicks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iRed Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I got http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2325 My result is good. I'll make some new tests when i get new fan cooler.Ill try to get 3.6Ghz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kramer2k Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 I got http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2325 My result is good. I'll make some new tests when i get new fan cooler.Ill try to get 3.6Ghz using geekbench 2, rosetta works fine, but the universal crashes on me! Anyone else have this problem? See specs below Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiss Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 universal crashes for me as soon as I try to run it, rosetta crashes after a few mins. JaS 10.4.8 AMD 64 3500+ SSE2 Nforce3 250gb 1gb Dual channel DDR 400mhz Gigabyte 7600GS AGP Boot Drive is a USB connected 40gb drive Windows drive is SATA 200gb Still early days for me using os x , might try it again if i set up a dual boot scenario Will submit crash log if dev is interested? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SA22C Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Seems like the universal needs SSE3 to run, which would explain why Rosetta works... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfpoole Posted April 10, 2007 Author Share Posted April 10, 2007 Will submit crash log if dev is interested? Thanks for the offer, but I don't think it's necessary. There's a known problem with Geekbench 2.0.1 on AMD-based Hackintoshes which I'll hopefully be able to fix for Geekbench 2.0.2 (which I'm hoping to release sometime over the next couple of weeks). I'll keep you guys posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabr Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I get 3841 on my iHack! http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2828 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts