Jump to content

[pre-release] macOS Ventura

fantomas

By fantomas,
in New Releases and Updates

 Share
3,556 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Cyberdevs
Cyberdevs
Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Slice said:

I tested without WEG this two keys... Logically it is enough but panic.

What about using WEG? does it still end up with a KP? I will test it later and see how it goes on my end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
miliuco
miliuco
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, antuneddu said:

I borrowed the app from Mrey  "System Preferences"  😆
It works perfectly on Ventura...

 

Interesting. Strange that it says unidentified developer (it's Apple). And Schedule works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
prcmelo
prcmelo
Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Slice said:

All looks good except:

1. I don't think you should use CsmVideoDxe.efi. It is for old cards not having UEFI BIOS.

2. The quirk EnableSafeModeSlide may cause Panic. Disable the quirk.

@Slice I've turned off EnableSafeModeSlide and also deleted CsmVideoDxe.efi and still can't install Ventura B4, got the same error as before.

I've been using CsmVideoDxe.efi to get 1440p at Clover GUI.

What I've noticed is that my macOS Ventura B4 makes a lot of files in the USB installer, I never saw that with others macOS versions when creating the installer.

Anyway, I think I'll wait for another Beta, (maybe 5), to sse if something changes.

Thanks for all your support!

Edited by prcmelo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fernando.c.neves
fernando.c.neves
Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hervé said:

@fernando.c.neves Ace!

 

What made you choose KBL FB 0x87C00000 and UHD617? 

ID: 87C00000, STOLEN: 34 MB, FBMEM: 0 bytes, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x0000078B
TOTAL STOLEN: 35 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 103 MB, MAX OVERALL: 104 MB (109588480 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[1] busId: 0x05, pipe: 9, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
00000800 02000000 98000000
01050900 00040000 87010000
02040A00 00040000 87010000

image.jpeg

over the recommended FB 0x591B0000? 

ID: 591B0000, STOLEN: 38 MB, FBMEM: 21 MB, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x0000130B
TOTAL STOLEN: 39 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 136 MB, MAX OVERALL: 137 MB (144191488 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000800, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorHDMI
[3] busId: 0x06, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
00000800 02000000 98000000
02040A00 00080000 87010000
03060A00 00040000 87010000

or default FB 0x59160000? 

ID: 59160000, STOLEN: 34 MB, FBMEM: 0 bytes, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x00000B0B
TOTAL STOLEN: 35 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 103 MB, MAX OVERALL: 104 MB (109588480 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[1] busId: 0x05, pipe: 9, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000800, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorHDMI
00000800 02000000 98000000
01050900 00040000 87010000
02040A00 00080000 87010000

 

Also, why did you opt for faking Amber Lake iGPU id 0x87C0 and MBP15,2 SMBIOS which is Coffee Lake?

Just because it works, and when I choose 16590000 the frame buffer looks like Intel UHD Graphics 617 and as Metal 3 device. And used MacBookPro15,2 my system become more stable with Ventura 13 BETA 4. Should I use MacBookPro14,1 (Kabylake) and 16590000 (Intel HD Graphics 620) ?

Edited by fernando.c.neves
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fernando.c.neves
fernando.c.neves
Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, chris1111 said:

Thanks @fernando.c.neves I add Ventura 13 in description JMicron program

 

Thank You for all your projects... I use a lot of your contribution to the community.

 

JMicron needs https://github.com/0xFireWolf/RealtekCardReaderFriend/releases/download/v1.0.3/RealtekCardReaderFriend_1.0.3_71e4bac_RELEASE.zip to Show info in System Info tool.

image.thumb.png.2cb8e425061fe66f37532e730a272fdc.png

Edited by fernando.c.neves
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PoMpIs
PoMpIs
Posted
Posted

Well, in the clean installation of beta 4, I don't have those problems of high CPU consumption caused by "powerd"

 

Moreover, I do not have that process 🤷‍♂️

 

 

Captura de pantalla 2022-08-01 a las 0.55.10.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fernando.c.neves
fernando.c.neves
Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Hervé said:

@fernando.c.neves Ace!

 

What made you choose KBL FB 0x87C00000 and UHD617? 

ID: 87C00000, STOLEN: 34 MB, FBMEM: 0 bytes, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x0000078B
TOTAL STOLEN: 35 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 103 MB, MAX OVERALL: 104 MB (109588480 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[1] busId: 0x05, pipe: 9, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
00000800 02000000 98000000
01050900 00040000 87010000
02040A00 00040000 87010000

image.jpeg

over the recommended FB 0x591B0000? 

ID: 591B0000, STOLEN: 38 MB, FBMEM: 21 MB, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x0000130B
TOTAL STOLEN: 39 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 136 MB, MAX OVERALL: 137 MB (144191488 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000800, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorHDMI
[3] busId: 0x06, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
00000800 02000000 98000000
02040A00 00080000 87010000
03060A00 00040000 87010000

or default FB 0x59160000? 

ID: 59160000, STOLEN: 34 MB, FBMEM: 0 bytes, VRAM: 1536 MB, Flags: 0x00000B0B
TOTAL STOLEN: 35 MB, TOTAL CURSOR: 1 MB (1572864 bytes), MAX STOLEN: 103 MB, MAX OVERALL: 104 MB (109588480 bytes)
Model name: Intel HD Graphics KBL CRB
Camellia: CamelliaDisabled (0), Freq: 1388 Hz, FreqMax: 1388 Hz
Mobile: 1, PipeCount: 3, PortCount: 3, FBMemoryCount: 3
[0] busId: 0x00, pipe: 8, type: 0x00000002, flags: 0x00000098 - ConnectorLVDS
[1] busId: 0x05, pipe: 9, type: 0x00000400, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorDP
[2] busId: 0x04, pipe: 10, type: 0x00000800, flags: 0x00000187 - ConnectorHDMI
00000800 02000000 98000000
01050900 00040000 87010000
02040A00 00080000 87010000

 

Also, why did you opt for faking Amber Lake iGPU id 0x87C0 and MBP15,2 SMBIOS which is Coffee Lake?

Now I changed the SMBIOS to 14,1 and choose Intel HD Graphics 620.

image.thumb.png.2044b1b239f2c08cd8e0fa6a069f5d65.png

image.png.0a85e30381d54c04d29b0f3f2b6040b4.png

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chris1111
chris1111
Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, fernando.c.neves said:

Thank You for all your projects... I use a lot of your contribution to the community.

 

JMicron needs https://github.com/0xFireWolf/RealtekCardReaderFriend/releases/download/v1.0.3/RealtekCardReaderFriend_1.0.3_71e4bac_RELEASE.zip to Show info in System Info tool.

image.thumb.png.2cb8e425061fe66f37532e730a272fdc.png

Thanks I use it with a Realtek card reader but I didn't know it worked on JMicron

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
eSaF
eSaF
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PoMpIs said:

Well, in the clean installation of beta 4, I don't have those problems of high CPU consumption caused by "powerd"

Are you sure? I am no expert but my installation is also a clean one and your usage data output is much higher than mine, albeit I suppose you have to factor in component specs for comparison although I think your figures should be a lot lower???!!! - But if you're happy with your results then all is well. :thumbsup_anim:

Spoiler

2022153040_Screenshot2022-08-01at01_31_23.thumb.png.468875ae21841225eef089e1a59991a4.png

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Slice
Slice
Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Stefanalmare said:

@Slice can you fix hwmonitorsmc2 to work well in Ventura? Thank you!

Sorry, no.

The HWMonitorSMC2 works fine in Ventura on a hardware without NVME.  It crashes reading NVMe disk. Some other developer needed. I just have no such device.

Otherwise I can prepare a version without check for NVME.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iCanaro
iCanaro
Posted
Posted

In my case, as I attempted to explain 

it only crashes when I use a kext injector to make the nvme disk look like an apple ssd controller. If I don't use the kext injector, HWMonitorSMC2 works flawlessly with my nvme disks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Henties
Henties
Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Cyberdevs said:

AFIAK it was included in the WEG all you need to do is to add the correct iGPU info like ig-platform-id (of the closes KabyLake relative to your iGPU) and the device-id for instance for my HD530 (i7 6700K) I used the following settings:

image.png

But then again i haven't tested the latest beta so somethings might have changed in the lates beta (which I doubt)

 

In my quest to also be able to install Ventura beta 4 on my Gigabyte Z170X-UD3 Skylake machine, I configured 

 

PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1F,0x3) --> AAPL,ig-platform-id = 00001259

as well as

PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x2,0x0) --> device-id = 1259000

in my OC config.plist file, unfortunately without success. 

 

Is there anything else that needs to be done to be successful?

 

Already upgraded to the latest OC 0.8.3 available including all kexts, dated 01 August 2022.

I am getting the infamous "No Entry" sign when I attempt the installation of Ventura beta 4.

 

The onboard iGPU 530 is enabled in bios and configured as a headless device.

For the dGPU I am using an AMD RX 580.

 

Greetings Henties

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stefanalmare
Stefanalmare
Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, iCanaro said:

In my case, as I attempted to explain 

it only crashes when I use a kext injector to make the nvme disk look like an apple ssd controller. If I don't use the kext injector, HWMonitorSMC2 works flawlessly with my nvme disks

@Slice, I don't speak about the problem with X299NVMe.kext and/or NVMe disk. I speak about HWMonitorSMC2 in Ventura. The window can not be resized and if I want to change the position on the desktop, it crash. It has same behaviour on Z690, Z390, B560.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberdevs
Cyberdevs
Posted
Posted

@Henties

I'm using OpenCore Auxiliary Tool to edit my config.plist. OpenCore Configurator hasn't been updated to support "LoadEarly" function yet.

All I can tell is that you need to remove all the DeviceProperties except for the iGPU and plug the display to your mainboard's HDMI/DP port (I'm using HDMI) instead of the dGPU otherwise you might get some issues booting into macOS although RX 580 should work just fine.

On my SkyLake rig i'm having and unsupported dGPU (R9 270X) so i'm using the iGPU as the primary graphics for Ventura.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iCanaro
iCanaro
Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Stefanalmare said:

@Slice, I don't speak about the problem with X299NVMe.kext and/or NVMe disk. I speak about HWMonitorSMC2 in Ventura. The window can not be resized and if I want to change the position on the desktop, it crash. It has same behaviour on Z690, Z390, B560.

use the padlock at the bottom right of the window, close it and you will see that you can resize without crashing the app

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PoMpIs
PoMpIs
Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, eSaF said:

Are you sure? I am no expert but my installation is also a clean one and your usage data output is much higher than mine, albeit I suppose you have to factor in component specs for comparison although I think your figures should be a lot lower???!!! - But if you're happy with your results then all is well. :thumbsup_anim:

  Reveal hidden contents

2022153040_Screenshot2022-08-01at01_31_23.thumb.png.468875ae21841225eef089e1a59991a4.png

 

 

Yes of course, I have CPU usage because when I took the screenshot I was installing programs, and apart from that I usually have safari with many tabs and quite a few things working...

I have now arrived home, yesterday I automatically went to sleep, and that is how it has been until now that I woke him up...

 

and notice that just as I left it yesterday, how little CPU usage it has when it wakes up (and "powerd" doesn't exist now)

 

1353027427_Capturadepantalla2022-08-01alas14_12_35.thumb.png.a68728292f63c8bd7282a32c1d631dc4.png

 

Edited by PoMpIs
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest 5T33Z0
Guest 5T33Z0
Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Henties said:

The onboard iGPU 530 is enabled in bios and configured as a headless device.

 

Whether or not a device is headless depends on the chosen AAPL,ig-platform-id and the framebuffer it's associated with. A framebuffer is considered "empty" if it only contains dummiy connectors. Since ig-platform-id (0x59120000) has connectors, it's technically not an empty framebuffer (that would be 0x59120003). But it doesn't matter since you're only using it to trick macOS Ventura into "believing" you are using a Kaby Lake CPU with Intel HD 630 graphics.

 

0x59120000

852722840_Bildschirmfoto2022-08-01um15_03_05.thumb.png.a7120f05ea652d176284070b8207e766.png

 

0x59120003

1604294324_Bildschirmfoto2022-08-01um15_03_47.thumb.png.3e7e54c6947126cde0c646a76a11e100.png

Edited by 5T33Z0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
eSaF
eSaF
Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, PoMpIs said:

I have now arrived home, yesterday I automatically went to sleep, and that is how it has been until now that I woke him up...

 

and notice that just as I left it yesterday, how little CPU usage it has when waking it up (and "powerd" doesn't exist now)

 

Actually it did occur to me that you may have many tabs opened at the time that induced the higher data output than my own. Now that you've successfully removed 'powerd', run  'First Aid' in 'Disk Utility' on all the Ventura volumes and check for any warnings, if none, you are good to go.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...