Irish_Man Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 (edited) Thanks to @5T33Z0 research I finally have working Ethernet and WiFi. Just do as he said and it will work. (previous post) At least, it's working for me. Edited May 10, 2022 by Irish_Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miliuco Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 @5T33Z0 If I understand well, flashing custom firmware + NOT dropping DMAR table + NOT loading DMAR modified table, is this correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry.M. Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 @Irish_Man can you show me your config.plist for comparison please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 (edited) Here's a summary regarding the I225-V on the Z490 Vision G board: https://github.com/5T33Z0/Gigabyte-Z490-Vision-G-Hackintosh-OpenCore/blob/main/I225_stock_vs_cstmfw.md Edited May 11, 2022 by 5T33Z0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish_Man Posted May 11, 2022 Author Share Posted May 11, 2022 3 hours ago, Henry.M. said: @Irish_Man can you show me your config.plist for comparison please? Here, config.plist.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henties Posted May 12, 2022 Share Posted May 12, 2022 @5T33Z0 On both my vision G hacks I have no problems with WiFi, and the rest, working simultaneously with two normal ethernet ports as per the attached pictures. The DMAR table has been dropped with the 2 memory regions removed. Will try later to revert back to standard, without dropping the DMAR table and see what happens. Will report back. Greetings Henties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henties Posted May 12, 2022 Share Posted May 12, 2022 @5T33Z0 Feedback. In my particular environment, when I do not drop the DMAR tables, I cannot turn on WiFi at all , it just stays switched off. I have however patched my Intel i225-V ethernet controller with "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" and not I225MOD. I am quite happy the way my Vision G hacks are working with respect to the extensive network capability available to me, therefore in my particular case having to drop the DMAR table to achieve full network functionality, seems a small price to pay, especially since I have not yet discovered any negative side effect when my Vision G hacks operate with dropped DMAR tables. Normally, I keep the i225-V disabled in the Network section of System Preferences because once the i225-V is enabled I have to disable the "Wake for network access" capability, as otherwise, with that feature enabled, my hacks fails to sleep properly and continuously wake a minute or so after they have entered their respective sleep mode. Greetings Henties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 12, 2022 Share Posted May 12, 2022 @Henties Thanks for your feedback. Since you are using a different firmware the conditions are different and therefore your result are not really comparable with my results. Is "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" an officiall firmwhere or where did you get it from? I would also be interesting to know which version of macOS you are referring to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henties Posted May 12, 2022 Share Posted May 12, 2022 (edited) @5T33Z0 Using Monterey 12.4 beta 4 build (21F5071b), this will change within the next few minutes because a download to "something later" - RC 21F79 - is presently in progress. The i225-V firmware I am using was offered by @badbrain as an alternative option to i225MOD, it requires a slightly different installation method and is ostensibly beta firmware to be released by Gigabyte sometime later, at least that is how I understand the situation. Yes you are correct in that the operational behaviour of "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" can be expected to differ from the i225MOD version, that being the reason and also in fairness to the readers of my findings why, in my original posting I mentioned that I am using "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" in my environment. Greetings Henties Edited May 12, 2022 by Henties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdawg Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 I have a Vision G Z490 with the I225-V revision 2. I've tried multiple times to flash the I225MOD, and it doesn't stick. In the GUI, after the F4/Load of I225MOD, I see the values have changed. After saving exiting out back to the fs0: prompt, I power off the PSU, hold the power button for 30 seconds, plug the power cable back in then power back on. If I go back into the GUI, the values have not changed even though it appeared to save successfully. Both @5T33Z0 and @badbrain have this board and the mod worked for them. Any ideas ? The three attachments are before trying the mod, the mod loaded showing new values, and afterwards, where it reverts back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdawg Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 @5T33Z0 Yours is using this driver? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdawg Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 On 5/12/2022 at 1:48 PM, Henties said: @5T33Z0 Using Monterey 12.4 beta 4 build (21F5071b), this will change within the next few minutes because a download to "something later" - RC 21F79 - is presently in progress. The i225-V firmware I am using was offered by @badbrain as an alternative option to i225MOD, it requires a slightly different installation method and is ostensibly beta firmware to be released by Gigabyte sometime later, at least that is how I understand the situation. Yes you are correct in that the operational behaviour of "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" can be expected to differ from the i225MOD version, that being the reason and also in fairness to the readers of my findings why, in my original posting I mentioned that I am using "FXVL_15F3_V_2MB_1.68.bin" in my environment. Greetings Henties @Henties How well has the 1.68 firmware worked for you on the Vision G? Is yours an Intel 225-V Rev 02? This is soooooo frustrating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henties Posted May 27, 2022 Share Posted May 27, 2022 @slickdawg The 1.68 firmware works quite well with my Intel i225-V rev. 02 onboard NIC. The only problem that I experience with any of the so-called fixes to get the i225-v working properly has been sleep. Every time that my hacks, with this particular NIC enter sleep, the machine wakes up again shortly thereafter. To prevent this happening I have to disable "Wake for network access" in System Preferences, a functionality I do not wish to be without as a result of which my i225-V NICs remain disabled in Monterey. Using D-Link DGE-560T NICs instead, these do not suffer from the wake after sleep problem, allowing me to wake these hacks whenever and from wherever I want. Greetings Henties 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 27, 2022 Share Posted May 27, 2022 @slickdawg Sorry for the late response. I am cut-off from Internet access since monday, so my desktop pc is offline. So I had to take a screenshot and put it on a flashdrive, etc, etc. I am using the .dext driver: Your screenshot doesn't show the file extension nor the location of the driver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdawg Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 On 5/27/2022 at 9:55 AM, 5T33Z0 said: @slickdawg Sorry for the late response. I am cut-off from Internet access since monday, so my desktop pc is offline. So I had to take a screenshot and put it on a flashdrive, etc, etc. I am using the .dext driver: Your screenshot doesn't show the file extension nor the location of the driver. Exactly! And I cannot figure out why. Strangely enough, I can boot Big Sur 11.6.6 with no boot flags and it loads the exact same driver yours has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 @slickdawg My screenshot is from Big Sur as well. I can check Monterey tomorrow and report. In Catalina the I225 no longer works with the modded firmware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) @slickdawg My Screenshot looks the same as your in Monterey. But in my case, the controller works: Edited June 1, 2022 by 5T33Z0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdawg Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 50 minutes ago, 5T33Z0 said: @slickdawg My Screenshot looks the same as your in Monterey. But in my case, the controller works: How strange! @5T33Z0 Just double checking - is your BIOS still set like what you have on your GitHub ? CSM Support - Disabled Vt-d - Enabled SATA - Enabled Serial Port - Disabled Above 4G - Enabled Internal Graphics - Enabled IOAPIC - Enabled CFG Lock - Disabled Windows 10 Features - Windows 10 Fast Boot - Enabled Audio - Disabled Edited June 1, 2022 by slickdawg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 @slickdawg Yes, it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 Installed Ventura. Ethernet still works! Installation requires disabling AvoidRuntimeDefrag and Board-ID VMM spoof patches (if you have them). I think this was one of the easiest installs I can remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geforcefan Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) Hey folks, I just updated to Monterey and my ethernet stopped working, so I checked the subsystem vendor id and id, boths seems to be right without flashing a custom firmware or applying an aml file. System Information tools shows in my opinion a functioning ethernet. I got "cable unplugged" in the network settings which is not true, since I got connection on windows with pretty much the same cable and without touching anything. Did I missed something? Btw, Motherboard: Gigabyte Vision G z490, radeon 6800xt, 10900k, followed @5T33Z0 instructions on github, removed ethernet device from config.plist, using following boot args: "dk.e1000=0 agdpmod=pikera" Edited June 29, 2022 by geforcefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) @geforcefan You would be the first one I know with a Z490 Vision G where the Device Header of the I225-V is correct. You need to use e.1000=0 in Monterey Otherwise you either need Fix 1 or Fix 2: https://github.com/5T33Z0/Gigabyte-Z490-Vision-G-Hackintosh-OpenCore/blob/main/I225-V_FIX.md Edited June 29, 2022 by 5T33Z0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geforcefan Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) @5T33Z0 I tried e.1000=0 as well as the first fix, both didn´t worked for me. So basically the ethernet information on system information might be wrong, right? (because I didn´t changed anything nor flashed something, those are the subsystem ids I got) But the kext seems to be load, got a mac address, is this not an indication of a working ethernet device? btw, after using e.1000=0, the loaded kext is appleintel210ethernet.kext (shown in system information) Edited June 29, 2022 by geforcefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geforcefan Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, 5T33Z0 said: @geforcefan You would be the first one I know with a Z490 Vision G where the Device Header of the I225-V is correct. You need to use e.1000=0 in Monterey Otherwise you either need Fix 1 or Fix 2: https://github.com/5T33Z0/Gigabyte-Z490-Vision-G-Hackintosh-OpenCore/blob/main/I225-V_FIX.md here we go, dumped my original firmware, never flashed anything, those are the right subsystem ids, no custom firmware needed for me, ethernet is still not working because "the cable is not plugged in". So I guess I am the first one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts