ANTIKO Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 3 minutes ago, AslashA said: Устанавливаю на nvme ssd и sata ssd. это погоду не делает. ставил и так и так. ставил даже когда как внешний отображался. у тебя msr=02 залочен как вижу? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 6 minutes ago, Антико said: это погоду не делает. ставил и так и так. ставил даже когда как внешний отображался. у тебя msr=02 залочен как вижу? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTIKO Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 (edited) 3 минуты назад AslashA сказал: Нет. тогда зачем SSDT-CPUXCPM? Если разлочен - XCPM и так работает. PS позднее спишемся на лайфе - обсудим.)) ехать надо. Edited December 6, 2020 by Антико Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted December 7, 2020 Share Posted December 7, 2020 (edited) On 12/6/2020 at 2:18 PM, nmano said: If you install OS X to SSD Hard Drive please connect sata cable through Motherboard. Some PCIe sata card not mounting. Yesterday I was looking for a problem all day because of which an error occurs during installation. !!! I found it !!! The source of the problem is the xcpm_bootstrap_HASwell_E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N. Mano patch. How did I find this out? I removed all dsdt patches (except for LPCB) and kernel patches and tried to install the system from a USB flash drive. To my delight, the installation went without errors or problems. Then I enabled all dsdt patches, but disabled all kernel patches. The installation went smoothly as well. After that I started looking for the problem in the kernel patches, turning them on and off one at a time. So I found out that after enabling the xcpm_bootstrap_HASwell_E patch, the same "13 minutes" error appears during installation. Now the question is to @nmano . What is the problem with this patch during installation and how to fix it? P.S. All operations were performed with AppleXcpmExtraMsrs quirk disabled and emulation Cpuid1Data = F2060300000000000000000000000000. Installation error also appears when emulating Cpuid1Data = C3060300000000000000000000000000 Edited December 7, 2020 by AslashA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razor7 Posted December 7, 2020 Share Posted December 7, 2020 (edited) Moved to Edited December 12, 2020 by razor7 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted December 28, 2020 Author Share Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) XCPM 11.1 & 11.2 are same patches. Edited January 16, 2021 by nmano 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxFluteHD Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 On 12/7/2020 at 9:22 AM, AslashA said: Yesterday I was looking for a problem all day because of which an error occurs during installation. !!! I found it !!! The source of the problem is the xcpm_bootstrap_HASwell_E (c) Pike R. Alpha Modify By N. Mano patch. How did I find this out? I removed all dsdt patches (except for LPCB) and kernel patches and tried to install the system from a USB flash drive. To my delight, the installation went without errors or problems. Then I enabled all dsdt patches, but disabled all kernel patches. The installation went smoothly as well. After that I started looking for the problem in the kernel patches, turning them on and off one at a time. So I found out that after enabling the xcpm_bootstrap_HASwell_E patch, the same "13 minutes" error appears during installation. Now the question is to @nmano . What is the problem with this patch during installation and how to fix it? P.S. All operations were performed with AppleXcpmExtraMsrs quirk disabled and emulation Cpuid1Data = F2060300000000000000000000000000. Installation error also appears when emulating Cpuid1Data = C3060300000000000000000000000000 Had the exact same issue today. Thank you so much for saving my time finding the issue myself! Would be very interesting to find out why this happens indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 Has anyone tried to enable Quirks -> TscSyncTimeout instead of CpuTscSync.kext 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 On 1/15/2021 at 1:14 PM, pitrysha said: Has anyone tried to enable Quirks -> TscSyncTimeout instead of CpuTscSync.kext If the "sleep" function is not necessary for you, then you can delete CpuTscSync.kext, and use Quirks instead -> TscSyncTimeout = 500000 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 On 1/16/2021 at 2:57 PM, pitrysha said: If the "sleep" function is not necessary for you, then you can delete CpuTscSync.kext, and use Quirks instead -> TscSyncTimeout = 500000 Does the X99 sleep function work fine?)) I'm not at all sure if this kext is necessary for X99 hardware. I tried it with and without it, I didn't notice the difference. In the logs, there were also no messages about out-of-sync cores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 @nmano see these patches config.plist.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proteinshake Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 (edited) On 1/19/2021 at 2:08 PM, pitrysha said: @nmano see these patches config.plist.zip 1.42 kB · 19 downloads What do these patches do, if I dare asking? And thanks @nmano, you're doing a great job providing your patches. Without them, my X99 system with SMBIOS iMacPro1,1 is just terribly slow and only MacPro7,1 is close, but no cigar. Edited February 5, 2021 by proteinshake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 On 2/5/2021 at 8:18 PM, proteinshake said: What do these patches do, if I dare asking? And thanks @nmano, you're doing a great job providing your patches. Without them, my X99 system with SMBIOS iMacPro1,1 is just terribly slow and only MacPro7,1 is close, but no cigar. This is an addition to the nine patches @nmano to fix DSDT bugs. They are optional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imsobored Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 Born again NOOB! Im looking to install Catalina 10.15.7 on my PC and need some help. I've never used OpenCore before, but i've used Clover a looooong time ago. I mainly want to try with OpenCore because I hear it runs better. System Info: i7-5820K Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3 16GB DDR4 RAM RX580 4gb Can anyone direct me to a good EFI folder for my MOBO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tete001 Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 --- REPORT -- TEST system x299/ skylake-x / 11.1 can not boot with this patch when emulate #CPUID Skylake-X 0x050654 /Skylake-H 0x0406E3 "_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 Modify By N.Mano 11.0.1, 11.1 " so i disable smc scope_msrs_2.. any other patch code for skylake-x with "xcpm_smt_scope_msrs_2". ??? anyway this patch not working for skylake x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 16 hours ago, tete001 said: --- REPORT -- TEST system x299/ skylake-x / 11.1 can not boot with this patch when emulate #CPUID Skylake-X 0x050654 /Skylake-H 0x0406E3 "_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 Modify By N.Mano 11.0.1, 11.1 " so i disable smc scope_msrs_2.. any other patch code for skylake-x with "xcpm_smt_scope_msrs_2". ??? anyway this patch not working for skylake x Try so Cpuid1Data <-> E5060500 00000000 00000000 00000000 Cpuid1Mask <-> FFFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 00000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 19 hours ago, tete001 said: --- REPORT -- TEST system x299/ skylake-x / 11.1 can not boot with this patch when emulate #CPUID Skylake-X 0x050654 /Skylake-H 0x0406E3 "_xcpm_SMT_scope_msrs_2 Modify By N.Mano 11.0.1, 11.1 " so i disable smc scope_msrs_2.. any other patch code for skylake-x with "xcpm_smt_scope_msrs_2". ??? anyway this patch not working for skylake x Options are still possible Cpuid1Data <-> 53060500 00000000 00000000 00000000 Cpuid1Mask <-> FFFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 00000000 Cpuid1Data <-> E3060500 00000000 00000000 00000000 Cpuid1Mask <-> FFFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 00000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scsimaya Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 (edited) Hi, unfortunately the patchs have stopped working on Big Sur 11.3 beta3 Edited March 5, 2021 by scsimaya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted March 14, 2021 Author Share Posted March 14, 2021 I check 11.2.3 Kernel Patches are same Thanks to Apple. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyckyj Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 (edited) Got this working on a Dell T7810 Desktop with an E5-2678 V3. I was able to unlock MSR 0xE2 register hidden in the BIOS with RU.efi (labelled as MSR Lock not CFG Lock) and XCPM enabled through the SSDT-PLUG ACPI patch so I don't think most of these patches are necessary for me. All I needed was the 2nd SMT Scope patch for booting and the P-state patch to get the entire range of P-states. Without it my all core turbo was ~2.65Ghz, with it I get the full 2.90GHz. I can use 'AppleXcpmExtraMsrs' instead of the SMT Scope patch but this seems like a better, more targeted approach. Would any of the other patches be of use to me? I found this overview for some of them but I'm not sure what the rest do. I've attached my Geekbench5 score before and after the pstate patch. Huge improvement. Should have very solid performance when I add a 2nd CPU. Thanks nmano! Edited April 17, 2021 by Dyckyj Forgot a detail: use of SSDT-PLUG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxx7650 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 Hey guys quick question is it possible to install Big Sur on Asus x99AII without unlocked Nvram bios? I am using Clover on Catalina, not used to OC tried a few OC efi's but none of them work after the second reboot Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted April 28, 2021 Author Share Posted April 28, 2021 XCPM 11.3 (20E232) I update XCPM patches for 11.3 Thanks for Apple. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 Has anyone been able to install macOS 12 Monterey on x99? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinicius P. Miranda Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 14 hours ago, pitrysha said: Has anyone been able to install macOS 12 Monterey on x99? I got it on x79, except the CPU is always at 99% used. necessary flag -lilubetaall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmadd Posted July 1, 2021 Share Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) Hi all, I have an issue with speed in MacOS Big Sur 11.4 with this hardware: Asus Prime X99-A II Intel Core i7 6950X The system runs but the CPU speed are something like 30% off what they should be. I've updated all the patches for Big Sur but still the CPU runs slow. CPU frequency is stuck on 3.0Ghz no matter what. All of this after I updated the bios. Prior the machine was running as expected. Thing is even if I go back to the previous Bios now the machine is stuck at 3.0Ghz and runs slow. EDIT1: The system runs slow even on Catalina. Can anyone help? Thanks a lot! Edited July 1, 2021 by zzmadd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts