RemB Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) Here I'm attached config.plist without PlatformInfo data (insert yours info) and SSDT patches (put this in ACPI Folder OC). No needs to edit DSDT. GA-X99-UD5-WiFi is working well. X99-Conf-SSDTs.zip Edited October 15, 2020 by RemB 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Ranger Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Happy to report that with the latest patches, I just installed Big Sur to my test SDD and it seems to be fully working. BIG THANKS to @RemB for finding a solution for us X99 users. I am super happy!!! Regards, Mike 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Once again I am convinced how much X99 hardware is problematic for a hackintosh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 7 hours ago, RemB said: Here I'm attached config.plist without PlatformInfo data (insert yours info) and SSDT patches (put this in ACPI Folder OC). No needs to edit DSDT. GA-X99-UD5-WiFi is working well. X99-Conf-SSDTs.zip Doesn't work for me. Stops at "apfs_module_start: 2464: setting max link-id cache size: 18" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemB Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 hour ago, pitrysha said: Doesn't work for me. Stops at "apfs_module_start: 2464: setting max link-id cache size: 18" It's an another problem. What config.plist did you use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) 42 minutes ago, RemB said: It's an another problem. What config.plist did you use? See if you can tell me what the problem is Архив.zip Edited October 15, 2020 by pitrysha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemB Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 54 minutes ago, Антико said: Don't stop at this point. I already downloaded the full Big Sur installer from today twice, but still the same error. Don't kick in the right direction? Config your own. config.plist opencore-2020-10-15-120706.txt Антико, формально говоря, я сам увидел на своей машине бигсюр только четыре дня назад. Мне удалось только решить проблему обхода KP, которая возникала. Тут кажется лучше обратиться на applelife за помощью. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemB Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, pitrysha said: See if you can tell me what the problem is Архив.zip What version OpenCore you use? Where is PlatformInfo section? Edited October 15, 2020 by RemB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 11 minutes ago, RemB said: What version OpenCore you use? Where is PlatformInfo section? Model iMacPro 1,1 config.plist.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemB Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, pitrysha said: Stops at "apfs_module_start: 2464: setting max link-id cache size: 18" Is it a kernel message? As i understand Edited October 15, 2020 by RemB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrysha Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 19 minutes ago, RemB said: Is it a kernel message? As i understand Found a bug in ssdt. Everything is working . thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StephanCA Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Does anyone have updated Kernel patches for xcpm_core_scope_msrs and xcpm_bootstrap HASwell-E on latest Big Sur public beta? The ones from main post do not work anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anerik70 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Atermiter X79G00E confirm working! I only deleted the UNC0 device on my custom DSDT and done. Thaaaaaaaaaaaank you @RemB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 When I found out that the problem in UNC0 no one paid attention to it)) Without waiting for feedback, I also stopped and did not continue! On 9/21/2020 at 4:09 PM, AslashA said: The problem is not with the device names. I renamed the devices similar to native macpro7,1, but the problem persists. At the same time, catalina with this dsdt worked fine. I just tried to remove UNCx devices and there is no more panic during installation. But the installation stops at this step. If you remove nvme ssd, it stops at the same step, but without the nvme error. Therefore, there is a panic for some device on the UNC0 bus. Now you need to determine which device is in conflict. Today I will try to remove the report from Aida64 and, comparing with Ioreg, determine which devices are on the UNC0 bus. P.S. I apologize for my English)) I use google translator. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankovich Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) On 10/14/2020 at 7:27 PM, RemB said: Надо смотреть DSDT. @RemB не могли бы Вы взглянуть на мои файлы? Ошибка вроде как у ваших материнок, но простое добавление UNC патча не помогло вроде. Нужно ли в моем случаее RTC добавлять? или может UNC как-то по другому у меня прописывается. Заранее спасибо! config.plist DSDT.aml SSDT.aml Без патча С патчем (без файла RTC) Maybe fix was found. Tomorrow will try: Edited October 15, 2020 by Frankovich 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyu1985 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) I confirm the SSDT for UNC and RTC0 Range is working for me. I needed to add them to my working EFI for Catalina and everything is working well. Edit : here is my EFI EFI.zip Edited October 15, 2020 by nyu1985 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cclown98 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) Ok for those who think that i'm {censored} that does not like helping people, i'm not always reading this forum because i work a lot since i'm not from a rich country if you wanna disable the Uncore pci bridge to handle the crashes on big sur you need to do something like this, by the way i was working on a method to get full turbo unlock with sleep and wake on X99 with C612 chipsets motherboards i'm so sorry if i have not helped you can contact me directly on telegram as https://t.me/x99hacking this method for disabling uncore bridges was gave by @RemB DISABLE-UNCORE-PCI-BRIDGES.dsl DISABLE-UNCORE-PCI-BRIDGES.aml Edited October 16, 2020 by Cclown98 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemB Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 3 hours ago, Cclown98 said: Ok for those who think that i'm {censored} that does not like helping people, i'm not always reading this forum because i work a lot since i'm not from a rich country if you wanna disable the Uncore pci bridge to handle the crashes on big sur you need to do something like this, by the way i was working on a method to get full turbo unlock with sleep and wake on X99 with C612 chipsets motherboards i'm so sorry if i have not helped you can contact me directly on telegram as https://t.me/x99hacking this method for disabling uncore bridges was gave by @RemB DISABLE-UNCORE-PCI-BRIDGES.dsl DISABLE-UNCORE-PCI-BRIDGES.aml There is no need to write four _INI methods in each UNCx. SSDT-UNC.aml disables all UNCx. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTIKO Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Cclown98 said: i work For some reason, your work does not prevent you from showing off on Reddit, but it does prevent you from helping your colleagues. Поздно пить боржоми, если печень отсутствует. Edited October 16, 2020 by Антико 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cclown98 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 17 minutes ago, Антико said: For some reason, your work does not prevent you from showing off on Reddit, but it does prevent you from helping your colleagues. Поздно пить боржоми, если печень отсутствует. Little boy i made that post like 3 months ago, once i had time at least try to help people and do not criticize the others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cclown98 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) Alright guys i just finished creating a new efi folder with all patches kernel patches in order to get PM on x99 motherboards, this could not be done without the help of @nmano also i added an example i've found very util for those that use amd rx 500 series dGPU by changing framebuffer to orinoco i get a reduction on the power consumption along with a small increase of performance. Mac OS Version: Big sur beta 10 (20A5395g) Kernel patches: Kernel->Patch Amd dGPU example: DeviceProperties->Add->PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x3,0x0)/Pci(0x0,0x0) Note: replace for your dGPU PciRoot EFI.zip Edited October 16, 2020 by Cclown98 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTIKO Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 20 minutes ago, Cclown98 said: post like 3 months ago Son, it doesn't make you feel any better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cclown98 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, Антико said: Son, it doesn't make you feel any better. It's not my fault being one of the luky people that get working a x99 board without having to disable those uncore pci bridges, i do not know much about this, i'm just a guys trying to put efford to get my things working and kinda help the others, it was not about me trying to be egoist or so, then you should just limit your self to take what you need without complaining since you are that kind of person which complains without make something useful for the community because people don't break their mind just for solving your problem. you can know enjoy of this and be happy: 21 minutes ago, Cclown98 said: Alright guys i just finished creating a new efi folder with all patches kernel patches in order to get PM on x99 motherboards, this could not be done without the help of @nmano also i added an example i've found very util for those that use amd rx 500 series dGPU by changing framebuffer to orinoco i get a reduction on the power consumption along with a small increase of performance. Mac OS Version: Big sur beta 10 (20A5395g) Kernel patches: Kernel->Patch Amd dGPU example: DeviceProperties->Add->PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x3,0x0)/Pci(0x0,0x0) Note: replace for your dGPU PciRoot EFI.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AslashA Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Cclown98 said: Alright guys i just finished creating a new efi folder with all patches kernel patches in order to get PM on x99 motherboards, this could not be done without the help of @nmano also i added an example i've found very util for those that use amd rx 500 series dGPU by changing framebuffer to orinoco i get a reduction on the power consumption along with a small increase of performance. Mac OS Version: Big sur beta 10 (20A5395g) Kernel patches: Kernel->Patch Amd dGPU example: DeviceProperties->Add->PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x3,0x0)/Pci(0x0,0x0) Note: replace for your dGPU PciRoot EFI.zip Why use all these patches when PMDrv.kext (+ emulate and AppleXcpmExtraMsrs) does a great job without them???! Edited October 16, 2020 by AslashA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cclown98 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, AslashA said: Why use all these patches when PMDrv.kext (+ emulate and AppleXcpmExtraMsrs) do a great job???!!! We are on a post about kernel patches for x99/x299, and these all are kernel patches, and PMDrv.kext is kinda broken on big sur 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts