Ellybz Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Matgen84 said: Ok. It's a "work in progress" config.plist. Thanks to take a look, please. Tell me what is the reason of this message: OCS: failed to parse key field of type 0 config.plist Looking at it briefly, the only thing I found was @pickermode. You have it as External but if you're using NDK fork ( as your ACPI quirks confirms ) that pickermode should be "builtin" and not external. Edited February 18, 2020 by Ellybz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matgen84 Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, Ellybz said: Looking at it briefly, the only thing I found was @pickermode. You have it as External but if you're using NDK fork ( as your ACPI quirks confirms ) that pickermode should be "builtin" and not external. I've the same issue despite of the correction: OCS: failed to parse key field of type 0. config.plist SOLVED: "integer" instead of "boolean" on one key in config.plist Edited February 18, 2020 by Matgen84 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 @cpla I am here to share my style with you! OpenCore-0.5.6-RELEASE.zip 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpla Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Thanks, looks kick ass! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matgen84 Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Hi @btwise @Ellybz Actually, I use ScanPolicy=0 but I want to exclude ESP, keep all disks (internal, external, USB) on my system (Catalina+Windows on separate hard disk). I try several values without success. Do you know the right one! Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellybz Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Matgen84 said: Hi @btwise @Ellybz Actually, I use ScanPolicy=0 but I want to exclude ESP, keep all disks (internal, external, USB) on my system (Catalina+Windows on separate hard disk). I try several values without success. Do you know the right one! Please. You can use: 2689795 /// 0x290B03 All disks except ESP. Edited February 18, 2020 by Ellybz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 6 hours ago, Matgen84 said: Hi @btwise @Ellybz Actually, I use ScanPolicy=0 but I want to exclude ESP, keep all disks (internal, external, USB) on my system (Catalina+Windows on separate hard disk). I try several values without success. Do you know the right one! Please. use custom entries! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 @ndk When I started the MACOS system last time, after the next restart, the contents of the GUI icon display are wrong. Only when I move the cursor back and forth, it can be displayed normally. Similarly, when I started the last time is WIN10, after the next startup, the GUI icon The display of the first item becomes a hidden item, and it will display normally after the cursor is moved. Is this a bug? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpla Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Yeah can confirm it happens to me too since the local hard drive will show as 'catalina installer' until i move it back and forth for it to update too, never noticed it happening until today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n.d.k Posted February 19, 2020 Author Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, cpla said: Yeah can confirm it happens to me too since the local hard drive will show as 'catalina installer' until i move it back and forth for it to update too, never noticed it happening until today. New commit may fix it...please recompile, I think this only affect the one with hidden entry in front of the default entry. Edited February 19, 2020 by n.d.k 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matgen84 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) Hi I can't compile because the issue below: what is the solution! (Xcode 11.3.1) Spoiler Loading previous configuration from /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/Conf/BuildEnv.sh WORKSPACE: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2 EDK_TOOLS_PATH: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/BaseTools CONF_PATH: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/Conf /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C Source/C Attempting to detect HOST_ARCH from 'uname -m': x86_64 Detected HOST_ARCH of X64 using uname. mkdir -p . /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C Common make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX1014.sdk/usr/include/stdint.h', needed by `BasePeCoff.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [Common] Error 2 make: *** [Source/C] Error 2 Edited February 19, 2020 by Matgen84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n.d.k Posted February 19, 2020 Author Share Posted February 19, 2020 9 minutes ago, Matgen84 said: Hi I can't compile because the issue below: what is the solution! (Xcode 11.3.1) Hide contents Loading previous configuration from /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/Conf/BuildEnv.sh WORKSPACE: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2 EDK_TOOLS_PATH: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/BaseTools CONF_PATH: /Users/mathieu/Desktop/NDK_OC_056-93723b7_16_02_2020/OpenCorePkg/edk2/Conf /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C Source/C Attempting to detect HOST_ARCH from 'uname -m': x86_64 Detected HOST_ARCH of X64 using uname. mkdir -p . /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C Common make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX1014.sdk/usr/include/stdint.h', needed by `BasePeCoff.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [Common] Error 2 make: *** [Source/C] Error 2 remove the folder and do a fresh one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 2 hours ago, n.d.k said: New commit may fix it...please recompile, I think this only affect the one with hidden entry in front of the default entry. The same is true for returning a GUI from shell state, where the hidden entry description appears on the screen and does not correspond to the icon, which works when refreshed! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, n.d.k said: New commit may fix it...please recompile, I think this only affect the one with hidden entry in front of the default entry. After recompiling, it is much better, but if I set a auxiliary entry in the custom entry, after pressing the space bar, the auxiliary entry is sort by first. If I press the space bar again to automatically hide the entry, the auxiliary entry content will still be displayed under the first icon incorrectly！ Edited February 19, 2020 by btwise 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAbyOne Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Hello there, has anyone found yet a solution to reduce icons artifacts ? tried all possible combinations but still looks ugly... as you can see... the same for my clover boot are something else... any hints? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpla Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) Least artifacting i've seen was from Matgen's icons, not sure why square icons have less jagged edges but i think refind/clover do some smoothing/or maybe it's due to alpha not too sure. Edited February 19, 2020 by cpla 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAbyOne Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Well maybe i'm going to make a few more try, anyway it does'nt really matter, was just a test to the ndkbootpicker on OC, but i'll probably return to plain text what's really important is the bootloader working as it should... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btwise Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 36 minutes ago, cpla said: Least artifacting i've seen was from Matgen's icons, not sure why square icons have less jagged edges but i think refind/clover do some smoothing/or maybe it's due to alpha not too sure. Yes, the serrated edges are there anyway, it could be a render problem, N.D.K should do some optimizations! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n.d.k Posted February 19, 2020 Author Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 hour ago, LAbyOne said: Hello there, has anyone found yet a solution to reduce icons artifacts ? tried all possible combinations but still looks ugly... as you can see... the same for my clover boot are something else... any hints? Here's the hint, don't sit too close to your monitor...:). if you see the artifact, you're too close... If i know how to get rid of it i would...but it's beyond my knowledge for now. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matgen84 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 10 minutes ago, n.d.k said: Here's the hint, don't sit too close to your monitor...:). if you see the artifact, you're too close... If i know how to get rid of it i would...but it's beyond my knowledge for now. Is a fine keyline around the edge of the icons, will be a solution. It's beyond my knowledge too 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) could you post original icons files? jaggies could be an aliasing problem maybe clover and n.d.k's opencore release treat in a different way icons background keying color Edited February 19, 2020 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matgen84 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 11 minutes ago, fabiosun said: could you post original icons files? jaggies could be an aliasing problem maybe clover and n.d.k's opencore release treat in a different way icons background keying color I post my icons (Clover) which do not pass on n.d.k's OpenCore. icons.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 @Matgen84 it seems these icon are a diffferent package of above jaggies example.. Or I am missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n.d.k Posted February 19, 2020 Author Share Posted February 19, 2020 Clover is using multiple layer of images to compose the icons, I am still trying to figure out how it was done. This graphic thing is new to me, so i am learning as i go. I am all ear if anyone know how to fix this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpla Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) I think all icons will show it, here's his example screenshot with it https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/uploads/monthly_2020_02/ScreenShot-2020-02-15-083049.png.2621444d6b853ba5fa9bd0f6d3f7fc94.png Which is sort of the same as the above, it's just like a small white jagged circle behind the icons which makes it feel off, guess darker icons will show it even better, it's like there's a white shadow around the icons i guess, dunno why it's happening or why it ends up creating that effect. And yeah it's pretty tough @n.d.k, been looking through refind but haven't seen anything too obvious yet other than maybe lodepng.h/.c with a function and mention of "support for alpha channels, including RGBA color model, translucent palettes and color keying" Edited February 19, 2020 by cpla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts