PMheart Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 47 minutes ago, nmano said: Thanks @PMheart I tested same result. Find C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 Replace C1E308B8 00FF0000 31D29090 That's kind of weird then, it should be the same as our old patch... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badruzeus Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, PMheart said: That's kind of weird then, it should be the same as our old patch... Does using Bundle Executable rather than Bundle Identifier as a Name make any different related to KextInject? On my case (for example), on 10.11.6 having no problem if: <key>Name</key> <string>AirPortAtheros40</string> But since 10.12.x, I need: <key>Name</key> <string>com.apple.driver.AirPort.Atheros40</string> // or these are OS dependant / Clover? Thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badruzeus Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 On 1/29/2019 at 7:09 AM, fusion71au said: On my legacy Dell laptop (Geforce 8600M GT/tesla) using MBP7,1 SMBIOS and -no_compat_check boot flag, had same error as @macq - hang on message ioconsoleUsers: gIOScreenLockState 3, hs 0, bs 0, now 0, sm 0x0 after DSMOS arrives. Maybe we need to do something with these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 38 minutes ago, Badruzeus said: Does using Bundle Executable rather than Bundle Identifier as a Name make any different related to KextInject? On my case (for example), on 10.11.6 having no problem if: <key>Name</key> <string>AirPortAtheros40</string> But since 10.12.x, I need: <key>Name</key> <string>com.apple.driver.AirPort.Atheros40</string> // or these are OS dependant / Clover? Thanks. Hmm, I don't know, to be honest. I am not a developer of Clover. Well, I don't think KextToPatch has anything to do with KextInject. (Yet one thing to keep in mind is that KextToPatch also patches injected ones, e.g. imagine you patched FakeSMC for whatever reason and it is being injected, KextToPatch will handle it too.) It looks like a bug, you may report it to Clover threads. Thanks! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badruzeus Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 15 minutes ago, PMheart said: Well, I don't think KextToPatch has anything to do with KextInject. (Yet one thing to keep in mind is that KextToPatch also patches injected ones, e.g. imagine you patched FakeSMC for whatever reason and it is being injected, KextToPatch will handle it too.) It looks like a bug, you may report it to Clover threads. Thanks! Yeah, no problem.. "BundleIdentifier" as a KextToPatch's Name is also working fine on my 10.11.6 upto 10.14.x. Only, sometimes.. need to rebuild kernelcache && prelinkedkernel (I placed 3rd party kexts on \efi\clover\kexts #btw). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Badruzeus said: Yeah, no problem.. "BundleIdentifier" as a KextToPatch's Name is also working fine on my 10.11.6 upto 10.14.x. Only, sometimes.. need to rebuild kernelcache && prelinkedkernel (I placed 3rd party kexts on \efi\clover\kexts #btw). Yes, you better always use BundleIdentifier as it is unique for each kext thus is more precise. Well, Clover's KextToPatch is only able to patch those inside kernel cache, so you might use Lilu + plugins if there were any alternative. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tluck Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 On 1/26/2019 at 7:35 AM, macq said: Gt320m tesla, Actually can boot only with safe mode, in normal boot I reach to a point where it says io console something and then turns to blackscreen and cannot reach the desktop. i have a similar issue with HD3000. i just tried to update to 10.14.4 beta1 and i get blackscreen unless i disable acceleration - safemode or inject gfx id 0x12345678. wonder if this is the end of the road for non-metal systems? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) 0:106 0:000 Boot status=0 0:106 0:000 Running on: 'X299-WU8' with board 'X299-WU8-CF' 0:106 0:000 === [ GetCPUProperties ] ================================== 0:106 0:000 CPU Vendor = 756E6547 Model=50654 0:106 0:000 The CPU supported SSE4.1 0:106 0:000 BrandString = Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz 0:106 0:000 The CPU supported turbo 0:106 0:000 MSR 0x35 120024 0:106 0:000 TSC/CCC Information Leaf: 0:106 0:000 numerator : 250 0:106 0:000 denominator : 2 0:106 0:000 Calibrated ARTFrequency: 24003225 0:106 0:000 MSR 0xE2 before patch 00000403 0:106 0:000 MSR 0xCE 00070C2C_F3011E00 0:106 0:000 MSR 0x1B0 00000000 0:106 0:000 FSBFrequency = 100 MHz, DMI FSBFrequency = 100 MHz, Corrected FSBFrequency = 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 MaxDiv/MinDiv: 30.0/12 0:106 0:000 Turbo: 42/42/42/42 0:106 0:000 Features: 0xBFEBFBFF 0:106 0:000 Threads: 36 0:106 0:000 Cores: 18 0:106 0:000 FSB: 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 CPU: 3000 MHz 0:106 0:000 TSC: 3000 MHz 0:106 0:000 PIS: 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 ExternalClock: 25 MHz Hi @PMheart I have X299-WU8 with i9-9980XE I need xcpm_bootstrap patched for this CPU machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz CPU ID 0x050654 Thank you. Edited January 31, 2019 by nmano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) On 1/31/2019 at 9:49 AM, nmano said: 0:106 0:000 Boot status=0 0:106 0:000 Running on: 'X299-WU8' with board 'X299-WU8-CF' 0:106 0:000 === [ GetCPUProperties ] ================================== 0:106 0:000 CPU Vendor = 756E6547 Model=50654 0:106 0:000 The CPU supported SSE4.1 0:106 0:000 BrandString = Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz 0:106 0:000 The CPU supported turbo 0:106 0:000 MSR 0x35 120024 0:106 0:000 TSC/CCC Information Leaf: 0:106 0:000 numerator : 250 0:106 0:000 denominator : 2 0:106 0:000 Calibrated ARTFrequency: 24003225 0:106 0:000 MSR 0xE2 before patch 00000403 0:106 0:000 MSR 0xCE 00070C2C_F3011E00 0:106 0:000 MSR 0x1B0 00000000 0:106 0:000 FSBFrequency = 100 MHz, DMI FSBFrequency = 100 MHz, Corrected FSBFrequency = 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 MaxDiv/MinDiv: 30.0/12 0:106 0:000 Turbo: 42/42/42/42 0:106 0:000 Features: 0xBFEBFBFF 0:106 0:000 Threads: 36 0:106 0:000 Cores: 18 0:106 0:000 FSB: 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 CPU: 3000 MHz 0:106 0:000 TSC: 3000 MHz 0:106 0:000 PIS: 100 MHz 0:106 0:000 ExternalClock: 25 MHz Hi @PMheart I have X299-WU8 with i9-9980XE I need xcpm_bootstrap patched for this CPU machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz CPU ID 0x050654 Thank you. Hi, Firstly, X299 (CPUID 0x55) should be supported natively and thus no patch would be needed I guess. Well, anyway, if you do need it... Here you go: EDIT: Skylake-X (CPUID 0x55) is supported natively, no need to patch! Edited February 2, 2019 by PMheart 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yapan4 Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Hi, @PMheart Any news for Xeon W-21xx users? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) Just now, PMheart said: Hi, Firstly, X299 (CPUID 0x55) should be supported natively and thus no patch would be needed I guess. Well, anyway, if you do need it... Here you go: 89 d8 04 c4 3c 22 77 22 -> 89 d8 04 cd 3c 22 77 22 Thanks @PMheart xcpm_bootstrap_Skylake X © PMHeart Its worked Thank you. Edited January 31, 2019 by nmano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, yapan4 said: Hi, @PMheart Any news for Xeon W-21xx users? Sorry, I don't know. 1 hour ago, nmano said: As I said, CPUID 0x55 should be supported natively (i.e without _xcpm_bootstrap patch), cannot you boot without it? Edited January 31, 2019 by PMheart typo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Hi I can’t run AppleIntelInfo.kext when kext load system panic. I can’t run DarwinDumper if I thick CPU Information getting System panic. Please advice how to fix this. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, nmano said: Hi I can’t run AppleIntelInfo.kext when kext load system panic. I can’t run DarwinDumper if I thick CPU Information getting System panic. Please advice how to fix this. Thank you. Well, AppleIntelInfo is maintained by Pike R. Alpha, who has quitted now... So the repo is almost dead unfortunately... As for DarwinDumper, it's page is here, you may consider talking with the developers directly? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Just now, PMheart said: Well, AppleIntelInfo is maintained by Pike R. Alpha, who has quitted now... So the repo is almost dead unfortunately... As for DarwinDumper, it's page is here, you may consider talking with the developers directly? I can run without patch I just test with only fake cpu ID not any Kernel patches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 9 minutes ago, nmano said: I can run without patch I just test with only fake cpu ID not any Kernel patches. No, X299 is supported NATIVELY, meaning that you should get everything running fine without any patch. Please try disabling all possible kernel patches and try sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode See if it returns 1. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) Just now, PMheart said: No, X299 is supported NATIVELY, meaning that you should get everything running fine without any patch. Please try disabling all possible kernel patches and try sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode See if it returns 1. Last login: Thu Jan 31 01:15:49 on console Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode 1 Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ I test now without FakecpuID set in bios profile 1 overclock 4.2GHz I need to get 10,000 more core score I disable all kernel patches. Thanks @PMheart Edited January 31, 2019 by nmano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyufhl Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 59 minutes ago, nmano said: Last login: Thu Jan 31 01:15:49 on console Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode 1 Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ I test now without FakecpuID set in bios profile 1 overclock 4.2GHz I need to get 10,000 more core score I disable all kernel patches. Thanks @PMheart you have loaded X86PlatformPlugin.kext? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 4 hours ago, tyufhl said: you have loaded X86PlatformPlugin.kext? Yes I thick Plugin Type in ACPI in the Clover config. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 6 hours ago, nmano said: Last login: Thu Jan 31 01:15:49 on console Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ sysctl -n machdep.xcpm.mode 1 Navaratnams-Mac-Pro-2:~ x58$ I test now without FakecpuID set in bios profile 1 overclock 4.2GHz I need to get 10,000 more core score I disable all kernel patches. Thanks @PMheart If you get machdep.xcpm.mode = 1 without any kernel patch, then it proves what I said (that X299 is supported natively). Well, if the performance is somewhat low, try applying the "performance fix". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 1 hour ago, PMheart said: If you get machdep.xcpm.mode = 1 without any kernel patch, then it proves what I said (that X299 is supported natively). Well, if the performance is somewhat low, try applying the "performance fix". I test performance fix patched same result. Thanks @PMheart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 1 hour ago, nmano said: I test performance fix patched same result. Thanks @PMheart Please try the "old, long patch" (as we did before), the "old way" and "new way" (as I posted days ago) as well. Thanks a lot! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 3 hours ago, PMheart said: Please try the "old, long patch" (as we did before), the "old way" and "new way" (as I posted days ago) as well. Thanks a lot! I tested long patched 10.14.2 same result I will test tomorrow 10.14.4 with long patch. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMheart Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 3 hours ago, nmano said: I tested long patched 10.14.2 same result I will test tomorrow 10.14.4 with long patch. Thanks. Well, the "long patch" varies from time to time, are you sure that you are using the correct one? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 7 hours ago, PMheart said: Well, the "long patch" varies from time to time, are you sure that you are using the correct one? I update 10.14.4 I test long patched same result. F C1E30848 63D389D0 48C1EA20 B9990100 000F3048 FF05926E 76004883 C4085B5D C30F1F00 R BB00FF00 004863D3 89D048C1 EA20B999 0100000F 3048FF05 93AE7600 4883C408 5B5DC390 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts