Jump to content

[pre-release] macOS High Sierra

fantomas

By fantomas,
in New Releases and Updates

 Share
3,737 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

chris1111
chris1111
Posted
Posted

Do you have a link for the new beta 2. macOSSierraDeveloperBetaAccessUtility doesn't work anymore.

Its a same pkg remove al installer even in trash and other ssd

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberdevs
Cyberdevs
Posted
Posted

Its a same pkg remove al installer even in trash and other ssd

 

Thanks ;)

 

I was using another PC without any installer and the macOSSierraDeveloperBetaAccessUtility wasn't working so I used the direct link and now it's downloading.

 

This the link that @Kynyo posted here: macappstores://itunes.apple.com/app/id1209167288

 

But the package is only 14.5 MB?!?!?

I downloaded it twice and it's only 14.5 MB!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
checked
checked
Posted
Posted

macOS High Sierra Beta 2 success on my Haswell Lappy.

attachicon.gifScreen Shot 2017-06-22 at 3.35.56 pm.png

Still same issue of battery status but it's a beta.

 

EDIT: On the plus side i can now boot my my laptop with HDMI connected and it doesn't reboot halfway through booting. With HDMI audio.

Hi SavageAUS, 

 

Could you please send me the EFI folder for High Sierra Beta,

 

I can't install 10.13

 

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SavageAUS
SavageAUS
Posted
Posted

Hi SavageAUS,

 

Could you please send me the EFI folder for High Sierra Beta,

 

I can't install 10.13

 

Thank you.

I'm using my phone so can't see signatures, what are your system specs?

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I did, and I don't have any adblockers.

I had similar issue. I had to delete / rename beta 1 to download beta 2 as its naming it the exact same for beta 1 and 2.

macOSSierraDeveloperBetaAccessUtility does work still as that's how I got beta 2.

If your getting an incomplete download check network settings / reboot modem / router.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberdevs
Cyberdevs
Posted
Posted

I'm using my phone so can't see signatures, what are your system specs?

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I had similar issue. I had to delete / rename beta 1 to download beta 2 as its naming it the exact same for beta 1 and 2.

macOSSierraDeveloperBetaAccessUtility does work still as that's how I got beta 2.

If your getting an incomplete download check network settings / reboot modem / router.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I have no other copy of macOS High Sierra on my computer. But I will try to download it later. Thanks for the tip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wppley2
Wppley2
Posted
Posted

What kexts you install from sierra? The names...

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

AMDRadeonX3000.kext, AMDRadeonX3000GLDriver.bundle, IOAccelerator2D.plugin, IOAcceleratorFamily2.kext.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucy183
Lucy183
Posted
Posted

AMDRadeonX3000.kext, AMDRadeonX3000GLDriver.bundle, IOAccelerator2D.plugin, IOAcceleratorFamily2.kext.

And you get the card fully working without iGPU?

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wppley2
Wppley2
Posted
Posted

And you get the card fully working without iGPU?

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

I still needed to change 4 kexts for the Sierra to achieve graphics acceleration. I'm having the same Sierra result in OpenGL Extensions Viewer, which sounds good to me. I think total support in HS will not have without an auxiliary graphics card, so we'll have to make this little kexts exchange, but it has not affected the performance at all, and that's very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucy183
Lucy183
Posted
Posted

I still needed to change 4 kexts for the Sierra to achieve graphics acceleration. I'm having the same Sierra result in OpenGL Extensions Viewer, which sounds good to me. I think total support in HS will not have without an auxiliary graphics card, so we'll have to make this little kexts exchange, but it has not affected the performance at all, and that's very good.

So it's usable, you tried YouTube videos?

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wppley2
Wppley2
Posted
Posted

Anyway, what's puzzling me is that in the compatibility list I saw out there, iMac 2009 appears on, and they had no auxiliary video card ... I've been looking at the plist of the X3000 and I've seen that it looks like it has odd errors or changes and the torque is less than 10.12.5 . Would they release this beta with this so spoiled kext ????

 

Edit: Unless the Core2Duo used in this iMac 10.1 is considered an aid because it has the ability, even if very old, to generate video. And since Core2Quad does not have it, we can not have native support and we always need to use these Sierra kexts. I think that maybe that's why this iMac is on the compatibility list.

 

Edit2: Another thing I noticed: i'm not sure how graphics injection works, but since the Sierra i could no longer patch on the fly through Clover and when i put the framebuffer Baboon or Eulemur for my video card, which always worked previously, stays with screen Black (monitors turn off). I tried several things, but i did not want to have to modify the kext manually, so i did not have to do this at all update. Now i was thinking, if the bootloader is who tells the system what framebuffer to use, it will be that in the bootloader, the address of the framebuffer informed is outdated, thus causing a deviation of the AMD5000Controller.kext to a wrong address, making it impossible to be completed The patch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
erice
erice
Posted
Posted
Hello to everyone.

 

I have had difficulty installing the update according to the normal procedure.

I solved this: After downloading the upgrade, I started in the previous High Sierra, opened the update folder, made it accessible, and then I started my install.app from inside the system.

So a new installation started that has recovered all the previous one.

I apologize for my google-english. Hope it is understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucy183
Lucy183
Posted
Posted

Anyway, what's puzzling me is that in the compatibility list I saw out there, iMac 2009 appears on, and they had no auxiliary video card ... I've been looking at the plist of the X3000 and I've seen that it looks like it has odd errors or changes and the torque is less than 10.12.5 . Would they release this beta with this so spoiled kext ????

 

Edit: Unless the Core2Duo used in this iMac 10.1 is considered an aid because it has the ability, even if very old, to generate video. And since Core2Quad does not have it, we can not have native support and we always need to use these Sierra kexts. I think that maybe that's why this iMac is on the compatibility list.

 

Edit2: Another thing I noticed: i'm not sure how graphics injection works, but since the Sierra i could no longer patch on the fly through Clover and when i put the framebuffer Baboon or Eulemur for my video card, which always worked previously, stays with screen Black (monitors turn off). I tried several things, but i did not want to have to modify the kext manually, so i did not have to do this at all update. Now i was thinking, if the bootloader is who tells the system what framebuffer to use, it will be that in the bootloader, the address of the framebuffer informed is outdated, thus causing a deviation of the AMD5000Controller.kext to a wrong address, making it impossible to be completed The patch?

Man, changed the kexts you said and still can't boot without -x, can you upload your kexts because I'm on 10.12.6 beta 4 and I think that's the problem.

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wppley2
Wppley2
Posted
Posted

You will need to install the kexts, repair permissions and rebuild caches from HS in safe mode (-x). I'm using kext Utility for this procedure. The kexts from 10.12.6 should work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matgen84
Matgen84
Posted
Posted

 

Lilu  and NvidiaGraphics don't work on Beta 2 for me (EFI/Clover/kexts/others... or 10.13) ?  I tried also boot-args: -llilubeta -ngfxbeta 

 

Sorry for my english

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberdevs
Cyberdevs
Posted
Posted

Has anyone tried DP2 with APFS on a mechanical HDD yet?

Unfortunately I can't download the DP for some unknown reason yet so I can't test it myself :(

 

 

Update:

It's downloading I'll be testing it soon  :thumbsup_anim:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucy183
Lucy183
Posted
Posted

You will need to install the kexts, repair permissions and rebuild caches from HS in safe mode (-x). I'm using kext Utility for this procedure. The kexts from 10.12.6 should work.

I also use kext utility and can't boot with Sierra kexts, maybe you replaced more than 4 kexts.

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...