thenightflyer Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 I have the same Mainboard. You have modded bios ore unlock msr with KernelPatch? If You have modded bios can you share the file? I deleted the modded file but here there are guides how to patch bios with uefipatch...it's very simple. Here is the post: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/285444-uefipatch-uefi-patching-utility/page-96?hl=%2Buefipatch&do=findComment&comment=2277274 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Hi mano new optimized version DSDT.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted October 1, 2016 Author Share Posted October 1, 2016 Fixed unsupported GPU Error After Effects with CUDA 1-Install Cuda 2-Edit to raytracer_supported_cards.txt Just add your device on top GeForce GTX 970 GeForce GTX 285 GeForce GTX 675MX GeForce GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680MX GeForce GT 650M Quadro CX Quadro FX 4800 Quadro 4000 Quadro K5000 /Applications/Adobe After Effects CC 2015/Adobe After Effects CC 2015.app/Contents/Resources/raytracer_supported_cards.txt Fast Draft: Available Texture Memory: 1638.00 MB Ray-tracing: GPU OpenGL Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Device: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 OpenGL Engine Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-10.13.65 367.15.10.05f01 Total Memory: 4.00 GB Shader Model: - CUDA Driver Version: 8.0 Devices: 1 (GeForce GTX 970) Current Usable Memory: 2.66 GB (at application launch) Maximum Usable Memory: 4.00 GB raytracer_supported_cards.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenightflyer Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 @nmano Same for me, thanks tnf_ioreg.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saijohn Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Fabiosun, I won't have time to check FW 3402 for a month since I will be out for business trip. Will check it out once I get back. hi nmano could you check this? Could you help to create a valid DSDT for my system? I would like to know if using a correct DSDT produces different results on my rig Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 where your original DSDT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Hi Fliagd. I was wondering if you can take a look at mine too, for dual CPU? I keep getting kernel panic with 121 CPUS but when i shut off hyper treading I got 120 and can pass on to installation screen. I've tried playing with the DSDT and found SCK0-04 and not sure if thats responsible for passing wrong information to the kernel. Thanks a lot, Here is the original ACPI dump from clover. origin.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Hi Fliagd. I was wondering if you can take a look at mine too, for dual CPU? Have you put VoodoTSCsync? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 that's the only Have you put VoodoTSCsync? Thats the only thing I haven't done. What would be the value for 2x 22 core cpus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 that's the only Thats the only thing I haven't done. What would be the value for 2x 22 core cpus? try with tscsync to 21, If that does not work, try with 43 in tscsync Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Same kernel panic with hyper treading on with tscsync Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Same kernel panic with hyper treading on with tscsync With 21 and 43? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 With 21 and 43? With both, for some odd reason OS X doesn't like hyper treading on dual broadwell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 we can try it in tscsync 22x2x2=88 cores in tscsyn put 88-1=87 os x can believe that it is a single CPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Gimme a few min I'll test it outSame thing.Panic with hyper on:And without:What really confuses me is that between those two the first one have the double amount of processor ids, but what's funny is that I think os thinks we are in 2040 with 120 core cpus.Can this be the dsdt issue? on the side note, after I've managed to install, i get this, Terminal failes to open and GeekBench doesn't know what architecture it is running on. Oh and on this board I have to specify the amount of memory I've got in the SMBIOS section otherwise it only detects 32gb out of 128. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 when you boot without hyper threadingWhat is displayed in "About This Mac"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 when you boot without hyper threading What is displayed in "About This Mac"? It show 2x the cpu but unknown, I'm working on installing it again, will have the screen shot the moment I'm on the system, but the problem is even with the hyper threading off, the system is unworkable, can't access terminal, and gets some random kernel crashes time to time. I've tried tweaking DSDT with the X99 patches and removing extra CPU stuff from it, but no luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 Have you put a Fake CPUID? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 Have you put a Fake CPUID?Yup: 0x040674 That's the only one that worked for me. The weird thing is that fabiosun have the same CPU just a single one and different motherboard and it installs without a problem, I've even tried his config file just in case. Same results. I guess there is something ether in dual cpus or in the motherboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 (edited) I think this is due to the number of cores 44x288 cores must exceed OSX capacity managementThe motherboard is not in question osX management capacity would 2F (47) so 48 cores (CP2F) This is probably why you can not activate the hyper thearding Edited October 2, 2016 by Fljagd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 I think this is due to the number of cores 44x2 88 cores must exceed OSX capacity management The motherboard is not in question osX management capacity would 2F (47) so 48 cores (CP2F) This is probably why you can not activate the hyper thearding Thanks man, to be quite honest I'm fully ok with hyper threading off, my issue is the system instability and terminal crashing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 delete the cached kerneland do a repair permissions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 delete the cached kernel and do a repair permissions Trough single user mode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 (edited) no on classic boot put cache Kernel in the trash repair permission Reboot Edited October 2, 2016 by Fljagd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 Ok thanks man. I'll give a shot. no on classic boot put cache Kernel in the trash repair permission Reboot Nope, changed nothing, also here is the screen you asked for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts