gengik84 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 I try now Thanks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 A second try RX_480_470_Experimental_v2.zip all references to Baffin replaced by Ellesmere Let me finish of watching MotoGP and i'll try that 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gengik84 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 as it was before ... Now even AMD9500Controller.kext is not loaded... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Strange Maybe all what that is confirming is that the Polaris 10 (Ellesmere) support will be only enabled through Baffin accelerator? I'm tempted to believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 Strange Maybe all what that is confirming is that the Polaris 10 (Ellesmere) support will be only enabled through Baffin accelerator? I'm tempted to believe it. It will be even strange that baffins drives an ellesmere GPU tho 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 It will be even strange that baffins drives an ellesmere GPU tho I agree Then just lets hope Apple will add the native support in future Sierra minors updates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 I agree Then just lets hope Apple will add the native support in future Sierra minors updates. I'm pretty sure Apple is hiding the new iMac, and it will add full Baffin and Ellesmere support only after the new iMac release. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gengik84 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Apple...come on! @Fantomas1 Thank you again.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 I'm pretty sure Apple is hiding the new iMac, and it will add full Baffin and Ellesmere support only after the new iMac release. We'll see on September 7 at the keynote but I doubt we see this new iMac in the code of GM - Maybe in 10.12.2 or 10.12.3??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 We'll see on September 7 at the keynote but I doubt we see this new iMac in the code of GM - Maybe in 10.12.2 or 10.12.3??? Quite easy, yeah, i hope for March or April 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavo Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Same here: This looks like a non signed kext issue Update: I tried signing the kext that you uploaded, (because I can lol) but there is some errors in the binaries codesign says my main executable failed strict validation. Your Mach-O executable does not conform to modern Mach-O layout rules. You may be using a third party development product that hasn't been brought up to date, or post-processed your file in unsupported ways. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavo Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Could someone try this kext and post results please https://www.dropbox.com/s/fwsv86h1b7uslw9/AMDRadeonX4000.kext.zip?dl=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mork vom Ork Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Could someone try this kext and post results please https://www.dropbox.com/s/fwsv86h1b7uslw9/AMDRadeonX4000.kext.zip?dl=0 Not working w/o IGPU... but working with IGPU. Tested with my Sapphire RX480 NITRO 8GB (67DF1002). w/o IGPU still getting blackscreen after verbose mode. Hooked up to the card ist still one DP and one HDMI monitor. Kext get loaded in conjunction with IGPU set to be primary gfx: same screenshot in english: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavo Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Not working w/o IGPU... but working with IGPU. Tested with my Sapphire RX480 NITRO 8GB (67DF1002). w/o IGPU still getting blackscreen after verbose mode. Hooked up to the card ist still one DP and one HDMI monitor. Kext get loaded in conjunction with IGPU set to be primary gfx: Do you have hardware acceleration now? Also is this on a real mac or a hack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mork vom Ork Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 in conjunction with IGPU i have hardware acceleration also with the original kext. but not working without IGPU. so for me it makes no difference if using your kext or original one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavo Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 in conjunction with IGPU i have hardware acceleration also with the original kext. but not working without IGPU. so for me it makes no difference if using your kext or original one. From your sig specs you must be using iMac 17,1 SMBIOS which from my research only loads the R9 3xx Series drivers without a iGPU, so this could be an issue. I ordered a Sapphire NITRO+ RX 480 8Gb myself and will be here in 3 days, will try it out in my real Mac Pro 5,1 and post results. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavo Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Found that both Baffin and Ellesmere are indeed in the AMDRadeonX4000 binary: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 5, 2016 Author Share Posted September 5, 2016 Found that both Baffin and Ellesmere are indeed in the AMDRadeonX4000 binary: Yes, but if you look closely you will see Ellesmere is incomplete compared to Baffin which has more "code" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mork vom Ork Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 From your sig specs you must be using iMac 17,1 SMBIOS which from my research only loads the R9 3xx Series drivers without a iGPU, so this could be an issue. I ordered a Sapphire NITRO+ RX 480 8Gb myself and will be here in 3 days, will try it out in my real Mac Pro 5,1 and post results. No, not true. Right now i am using MacPro 5,1 as my SMBIOS settings within my config.plist. And this is not the problem, cause i tried a lot of SMBIOS-settings: iMac13,1 - iMac14,1 - iMac14,2 - iMac16 - iMac17,1 - MacBook10,1 - MacPro 5,1 and MacPro 6,1. Alle settings have been shown the same effect: only works with iGPU set to primary. Also you can see, that Dev.id 67EF1002 could be found within the baffincode of binary - but 67DF1002 would not be found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 @Mork vom Ork Please, try this --> binary file: find 02 10 EF 67 / replace all with 02 10 DF 67 Then in Info.plist replace 0x67EF1002 with 0x67DF1002 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mork vom Ork Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 i did this already: the value should be found 6 or seven times (didn't remember). But it had no effects. Still not running native. Look, there is much more BAFFIN code within AMDRadeonX4000 than ELLESMERE: BAFFIN ELLESMERE so it seems, the concentration of apple is more on BAFFIN code, than on ELLESMERE. Maybe new MacBooks will have RX460m as dedicated Grafik And i guess, ELLESMERE is using main code routine functions from BUFFIN for Acceleration. For me it seems, that Buffin will make the main Acceleration, and the included ELLESMERE code is only for "finetuning" values for Ellesmere-based hardware. You can see this, because right now, no "AMDEllesmereGraphicsAccelration" parts could be found. And always remember: in a real Apple MacPro 5,1 both cards running native (kext infoplist patching for RX480 neccesarry). Also take a look at this (part of CLOVER 3728 bootlog): 4:624 0:000 === [ RestSetupOSX ] ====================================== 4:624 0:000 EdidDiscovered size=128 4:624 0:000 00 | 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF 00 4E 16 02 92 00 00 00 00 4:624 0:000 16 | 34 15 01 03 80 50 2D 78 0A EE 91 A3 54 4C 99 26 4:624 0:000 32 | 0F 50 54 2D 4F 00 71 59 81 59 95 19 A9 59 B3 19 4:624 0:000 48 | D1 19 D1 4F 01 01 9A 29 A0 D0 51 84 22 30 50 98 4:624 0:000 64 | 36 00 98 FF 10 00 00 1E 00 00 00 FD 00 18 F0 0F 4:624 0:000 80 | 7D 0F 00 0A 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 FC 00 53 4:624 0:000 96 | 75 6E 70 6C 75 73 20 54 56 0A 20 20 00 00 00 00 4:624 0:000 112 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 B4 4:624 0:000 Unsupported ATI card! Device ID: [1002:67DF] Subsystem ID: [E347174B] 4:624 0:000 search for brothers family 4:624 0:000 ...compatible config is not found 4:624 0:000 Intel Intel HD Graphics 530 [8086:1912] :: PciRoot(0x0)\Pci(0x2,0x0) 4:624 0:000 Intel GFX revision =0x6 4:624 0:000 RCBA disabled; cannot use it 4:624 0:000 stringlength = 2964 4:625 0:000 CurrentMode: Width=1440 Height=900 4:625 0:000 Beginning FSInjection 4:625 0:000 Blocking kext caches Unsupported ATI card! ... compatible config NOT found <--- don't know, if this means, that injection wasn't possible. But i have the same effects when using the "Arbitrary" routine from CLOVER. When using Arbitrary, the GRAPHIC section gets ignored. But still only working in conjunction with iGPU enabled and primary. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 New iMac --> Polaris 10 New MacBook/Pro --> Polaris 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew82 Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 New iMac --> Polaris 10 New MacBook/Pro --> Polaris 11 But when Mac Pro 7.1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciro82 Posted September 5, 2016 Author Share Posted September 5, 2016 But when Mac Pro 7.1? The new MacPro whenever will come out it will have workstation GPUs aka FirePRO with probably VEGA chip and HBM2 ECC VRAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew82 Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Yes but I hope there will be similar situation as in GPU from MP 6.1 FIrePro D500 have the same device id like in 280x. So mayby RX 480 waiting for MacPro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts