Jump to content

AMD Polaris IDs on Sierra / High Sierra

Ciro82

By Ciro82,
in ATi

 Share
871 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

:guitar:  :guitar:  :guitar: [uPDATE END OF JULY 2017]  :guitar:  :guitar:  :guitar:

 

macOS 10.12.5/6 Sierra and 10.13 Beta 

 

Good news finally! 

Lilu.kext and Whatevergreen.kext (plugin) solved the "polaris issue" known for black screen at login. 

You can find more informations about these 2 kexts here ---> http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/321371-lilu-%E2%80%94-kext-and-process-patcher/

In a nutshell: put these 2 kexts in EFI/CLOVER/Kexts/10.12 or 10.13 and don't inject anything via Clover or DSDT or SSDT and your RX series card will work smooth like butter.  

iGPU primary or helper card are no longer needed ;)

 

k6ZUfGj.pngUQFQ4mb.png

 

 

 

[uPDATE 06/07/2017]

 

macOS High Sierra 10.13 Beta1

 

- Topic title edited in order to regroup all new topic(s)/discussion(s) into this one

- I let the liberty to TS to remove all this nonsense that I just wrote.   :P

- RX470 RX480 RX570 RX580 Full support by kexts and controllers, helper card or iGPU primary are still needed

 

Thanks for the update ;)

 

[uPDATE 11/1/2016]

 

MacOS Sierra 10.12.2 Beta1 and Beta2

 

- RX480/470: No official support*, there aren't changes in X4100 kext;

- Dayman and Guariba FBs are still incomplete in the AMD9500Controller kext;

- RX460: same as before - iGPU (or 2nd GPU) primary and cable swap after clover boot.

 

 

[uPDATE 10/27/2016]

 

Apple Event

 

Mac Book Pro with AMD Radeon PRO line: http://creators.radeon.com/radeon-pro/

3 new GPUs based on Polaris 11 4th generation GCN.

This new line explains why there are 3 Device IDs in the X4100 kext: 67e0, 67ef, 67ff.

jXuoC25.jpg

 

[uPDATE 10/24/2016]

 

MacOS Sierra 10.12.1 - RX480/470 No official support* - RX460 kinda works as before (iGPU or 2nd GPU as primary graphics)

 

 

[uPDATE 9/22/2016]

 

MacOS Sierra DP1,DP2,DP3 10.12.1 - RX480/470 No official support* - RX460 and Baffin family has now a dedicated kext: AMDRadeonX4100.kext

 

*Forcing the ID 67FF, via DSDT without touching the kext X4100, and using the iGPU as primary it's now possible to have a "good" acceleration on the RX470/480 (Still not a good solution)

 

DSDT INJECTION:

 

Device (GFX0)
{
Name (_ADR, Zero)
Name (_SUN, One)
Method (_DSM, 4, NotSerialized)
{
Store (Package (0x12)
{
"AAPL,slot-name",
"Slot-1",
"name",
"AMD Graphics Controller",
"model",
Buffer (0x12)
{
"AMD Radeon RX480"
},

"device-id",
Buffer (0x04)
{
0xFF, 0x67, 0x00, 0x00
},

"@0,name",
Buffer (0x0D)
{
"ATY,Dayman"
},

"@1,name",
Buffer (0x0D)
{
"ATY,Dayman"
},

"@2,name",
Buffer (0x0D)
{
"ATY,Dayman"
},

"@3,name",
Buffer (0x0D)
{
"ATY,Dayman"
},

"hda-gfx",
Buffer (0x0A)
{
"onboard-1"
}
}, Local0)
DTGP (Arg0, Arg1, Arg2, Arg3, RefOf (Local0))
Return (Local0)
}
}

 

 

 

[uPDATE 9/14/2016]

 

MacOS Sierra 10.12 GM 16A322 - RX480/470 No official support - RX460 "Sort of" support

 

Good news!

10.12 has a new AMD controller kext:

 

AMD9500Controller.kext:

 

D2CDHoG.png

 

 

 

67E0 1002 = Baffin Polaris 11 - RX460 (fully supported)   "Sort of" support, still needs iGPU as primary and blind boot on Developer Beta 8 

67FF 1002 = Polaris 11 ??

67C0 1002 = Ellesmere Polaris 10 - NO Support yet

67DF 1002 = Polaris RX480 (only ID) - No Support yet

 

Even with the new 9500 controller, there isn't support yet because the AMDRadeonX4100.kext has only the Baffin's (Polaris 11) section supported (sort of). 

We can only wait Apple's development and see what will happen. 

 

 

RX480/470's possible Frame Buffers in AMD9500Controller.kext: 

 

DAYMAN - Status: INCOMPLETE

GUARIBA - Status: INCOMPLETE

 

RX460 possible Frame Buffers in AMD9500Controller.kext:

 

ACRE - Status: FULL??

 

 

List of known AMD Polaris IDs: 

 

vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c0 ("Ellesmere [Polaris10]")

vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c1
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c2
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c4
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c7
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c8
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67c9
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67ca
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67cc
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67cf
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67df ("Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470 & 480]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e0 ("Baffin [Polaris11]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e1 ("Baffin [Polaris11]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e3
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e7
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e8 ("Baffin [Polaris11]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67e9 ("Baffin [Polaris11]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67eb ("Baffin [Polaris11]")
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67ef ("Baffin [Radeon RX 460])
vendor: 1002 ("Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]"), device: 67ff ("Baffin [Polaris11]")

 

 

 

RX480 prices (Reference PCB):

  • RX480 4Gb $199 plus tax = € 229-249 
  • RX480 8Gb $249 plus tax = € 269-299 

 

RX470 prices:

  • RX470 4Gb $179 plus tax = € 199-229
  • RX470 8GB $199 plus tax = € 229-259

 

RX460 prices:

  • RX460 2GB $  99 plus tax = €109
  • RX460 4GB $129 plus tax = €139
  • Like 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
maleorderbride
maleorderbride
Posted
Posted

Let's hope there's decent (if any) support for crossfire configurations...

 

If you mean actual Crossfire, then no. That never has happened before and I doubt it will here.

 

You only use Crossfire for gaming, so either boot into Windows for gaming (where performance is better anyway), or get a single, more powerful card for OS X gaming.

 

 

I hope someone posts in this thread soon with verification of the RX 480 working in 10.12!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Author
Posted

If you mean actual Crossfire, then no. That never has happened before and I doubt it will here.

 

You only use Crossfire for gaming, so either boot into Windows for gaming (where performance is better anyway), or get a single, more powerful card for OS X gaming.

 

 

I hope someone posts in this thread soon with verification of the RX 480 working in 10.12!

 

Double GFX's power computing with OpenCL apps will work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Author
Posted

so, anybody tested if this works?? which version of the RX480 should I get?? 4GB or 8GB for best compatibility?? also, will it work on El Capitan if we copy the kext?

 
8 or 4 gb that's not a problem, personally i haven't tested it yet. (i'm waiting for AMD reply on the power issue)
Copying kext from differents OS isn't properly the best choice, Sierra will eventually have Polaris support, we have to be patients and wait.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightf4ll
Nightf4ll
Posted
Posted

 

 
8 or 4 gb that's not a problem, personally i haven't tested it yet. (i'm waiting for AMD reply on the power issue)
Copying kext from differents OS isn't properly the best choice, Sierra will eventually have Polaris support, we have to be patients and wait.

 

 

Yeah, I'm waiting for non reference cards too with 8-pin power supply connector. Should be within 2-4 weeks and by then somebody will hopefully test it and report in here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah, I'm waiting for non reference cards too with 8-pin power supply connector. Should be within 2-4 weeks and by then somebody will hopefully test it and report in here.

 

Non reference has a weird ports configuration: 2 x HDMI, 2 x DP, 1 DVI... i predict lot of headaches LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightf4ll
Nightf4ll
Posted
Posted

Non reference has a weird ports configuration: 2 x HDMI, 2 x DP, 1 DVI... i predict lot of headaches LOL

 

I guess it will be more expensive too. Nvidia's 1060 should be releases soon too though, maybe this will drive the prices down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Author
Posted

I guess it will be more expensive too. Nvidia's 1060 should be releases soon too though, maybe this will drive the prices down.

20-40 dollars more than the reference one...

 

 

Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laberlohe
Laberlohe
Posted
Posted

With DP2 output is working on all three DPs and the HDMI-Port, but no acceleration for 0x67DF1002. Adding DeviceID to Baffin-Family IOMatch does the trick für Fiji (aka Fury) but not for RX 480. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ciro82
Ciro82
Posted
  • Author
Posted

With DP2 output is working on all three DPs and the HDMI-Port, but no acceleration for 0x67DF1002. Adding DeviceID to Baffin-Family IOMatch does the trick für Fiji (aka Fury) but not for RX 480. 

 

Have you rebuilt prelinked kernel after adding the ID in the kext?

Do you mind to post an attachment of an IOREG save file?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MattsCreative
MattsCreative
Posted
Posted

AMD RX 480 8GB can boot on macOS Sierra Public Beta

But no QE/CI.

 

Need patch AMD9500 kext ?

 

attachicon.gif螢幕快照 2016-07-13 21.41.44.png

 

attachicon.gif螢幕快照 2016-07-13 21.42.18.png

DP & HDMI can show on.

 

attachicon.gif螢幕快照 2016-07-13 21.41.58.png

i might have to trade my 290x for a 480 8gb

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VirusX
VirusX
Posted
Posted

can't wait for updates here in this thread :) I am planning to buy either the RX480 or the GTX1060. I definitely will wait until customs designs of the RX480 will be released. But Ciro is right - alternative output ports on customs cards might create a lot of headaches. I try to avoid those since I had enough of them with my MSI R9 270X :/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...