Brumbaer Posted July 16, 2016 Author Share Posted July 16, 2016 Hello Sasha, Clover lets you specify the Ram modules, you're using. Use Clover configurator and enter the data in the SMBIOS section. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ergot Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Having some issues with sleep...creating DSDT with my correct info regarding my CPU. there is no sleep configuration bar in system pref however i can do it via terminal, system go to sleep...when it wakes the system will restart. All relevant kexts are loaded, no other kexts on clover like NullCPU etc. Any idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamafilm Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Brumbaer, will this patch work on 10.10.5 Yosemite? I am trying to get Broadwell-E running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Brumbaer, will this patch work on 10.10.5 Yosemite? I am trying to get Broadwell-E running. Probably not.... Why Yosemite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfinchina Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 On that topic... Probably not.... Why Yosemite? On that topic, I'm trying to get Sierra to work because it has driver support for my R9 Nano (and Fury). With 5960x and an EVGA Micro 2. Not having much luck with Sierra on this cpu or a xeon 2690. I realise this thread is about El Capitan, but I'm thinking most ppl who have a 5960x, = X99, = maybe a decent GPU will be hoping for some Sierra fixes. Any success with this or other fixes on Sierra? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamafilm Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 I have some hardware and software that isn't compatible with El Capitan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted July 17, 2016 Author Share Posted July 17, 2016 I haven't tested on Yosemite, but it is unlikely that it will work. If you look at the first post, you will find a version of the patch for Sierra No experience with the sleep issue, probably somebody who has could chime in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 I've got dual E5-2683 v4 and I just woke the thing from sleep! So, sleep works in Sierra. I guess it wouldn't hurt to have the patch for Yosemite too. Can someone share Yosemite's IOPCIFamily.kext? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 I've got dual E5-2683 v4 and I just woke the thing from sleep! So, sleep works in Sierra. I guess it wouldn't hurt to have the patch for Yosemite too. Can someone share Yosemite's IOPCIFamily.kext? IOPCIFamily.kext 10.10.5 10.10.5 ori.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 IOPCIFamily.kext 10.10.5 Thanks! It seems that the patch for ElCapitan also works for Yosemite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiethemorris Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Thanks! It seems that the patch for ElCapitan also works for Yosemite. Yep, working here for me too, just did it today. Not sure if I need the FakeCPUID for it but I did that too FWIW. Everything seems to be working so I should be able to just run the El Capitan installer as soon as I get a chance. Can't speak on sleep because I've never used it on any of my desktop hacks since my audio interface makes my speakers pop. I'm assuming since I'm using NCPM it doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasha Medovarski Posted July 19, 2016 Share Posted July 19, 2016 Thanks again Brumbaer! I was successfuly setup CPU and memory (Gigabyte X99 UD4 r1.1+E5 2695v3 ES 14cores) , but one big problem is remain: Performance of gigabyte gtx980Ti windforce are 3x lower than on my old system asus P9X79pro+3930K. I usualy work in FCPX, Motion 5 and compressor. FCPX usualy use cuda on 980Ti and I know that because led lamp on card switch on, and effects works much faster than realtime. Now, on X99 system, FCPX doesn‘t activate cuda, led is off and performances are very low. Nothing is realtime. I tried to change smbios, almost every type. Also I patched AppleGraphicsControl.kext, but performance not changed. Now I think to back to old system. Does anybody have some idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted July 19, 2016 Share Posted July 19, 2016 Thanks again Brumbaer! I was successfuly setup CPU and memory, but one big problem is remain: Performance of gigabyte gtx980Ti windforce are 3x lower than on my old system asus P9X79pro+3930K. I usualy work in FCPX, Motion 5 and compressor. FCPX usualy use cuda on 980Ti and I know that because led lamp on card switch on, and effects works much faster than realtime. Now, on X99 system, FCPX doesn‘t activate cuda, led is off and performances are very low. Nothing is realtime. I tried to change smbios, almost every type. Also I patched AppleGraphicsControl.kext, but performance not changed. Now I think to back to old system. Does anybody have some idea? Could you verify the cpu & gpu performance with something else like geekbench, luxmark and cinebench to get some hint what's going on? I'm not sure but I think FCPX uses OpenCL. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apfelnico Posted July 19, 2016 Share Posted July 19, 2016 FCPX doesn‘t activate cuda … No, FCPX do not understand CUDA, It uses only OpenCL! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted July 19, 2016 Author Share Posted July 19, 2016 Yes it uses OpenCL, but NVidia cards on the Mac support OpenCL. So you should see acceleration from the video card in FCPX. You can use CompuBench CL from the Appstore to run OpenCL benchmarks. And here is the crux, it will not benchmark a 5960x system. It allows running the benchmarks on the graphics card, but they fail. Whether this is a 5960x problem or a CompuBench problem, I do not know. I tried to check directly in FCPX by comparing with and without driver, but FCPX will not run without the Webdriver. Sascha do you have a sample file for FCPX, where you can say how fast a certain operation should be when accelerated or how fast when unaccelerated, so we could check whether acceleration t is working on our systems ? Luxmark shows the GTX980TI OpenCL as working. Please test in your system. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasha Medovarski Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Thanx guys. Your comments was very helpful for me. After testing 980ti, I conclude that apple apps can‘t find OpenCL of 980Ti on my X99 system, because desktop, finder, safari, pages works slowly also. Most of apple apps use OpenCL. I tried adobe premiere, and during start crush OS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiethemorris Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Thanx guys. Your comments was very helpful for me. After testing 980ti, I conclude that apple apps can‘t find OpenCL of 980Ti on my X99 system, because desktop, finder, safari, pages works slowly also. Most of apple apps use OpenCL. I tried adobe premiere, and during start crush OS. take a look at this and see if it helps http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/306535-nvidia-web-driver-updates-for-el-capitan-update-07182016/page-23?do=findComment&comment=2211840are you using displayport? There's a lot of info in that thread from other people with the same issues, not sure if you've already looked at it. Good luck! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasha Medovarski Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Hmmm...crazy thing. I replaced 980ti with gt 220. Geekbench goes up from 21000 to 30000. Obviously I have big problem with 890ti. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiethemorris Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Hmmm...crazy thing. I replaced 980ti with gt 220. Geekbench goes up from 21000 to 30000. Obviously I have big problem with 890ti. Could it be broken for the 980ti in that version? IIRC there's a way to get it to use an older version of the driver... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted July 24, 2016 Author Share Posted July 24, 2016 I used my X99 with a 980TI under 10.11.4-10.11.6 Sierra DP1-DP3. No performance problems so far. Can't tell whether OpenCL works in Apple Apps, but the performance in Geekbench is ok. When you say you use a gt220, do you still use the Webdriver ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiethemorris Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Geekbench doesn't sound right... Geekbench shouldn't be affected by the GPU. Unless of course, the GPU is causing qe/ci to be disabled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasha Medovarski Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 I used my X99 with a 980TI under 10.11.4-10.11.6 Sierra DP1-DP3. No performance problems so far. Can't tell whether OpenCL works in Apple Apps, but the performance in Geekbench is ok. When you say you use a gt220, do you still use the Webdriver ? With gt220 I used system driver. But, I found prime problem. This is memory. On my board Gigabyte X99 UD4 there are 8 memory slots. At first, I had only 4 modules 8GB and I put them in slots 1,3,5,7. But, I noticed that mac os automaticly recognise only 4 slots 1,2,3,4. Your advice was to map slots in clover (0,2,4,6) , and I did it. Mac os recognise all 4 modules, 32Gb, but, problems became worst. Mac os was very unstable. Than I put 4 modules in 1,2,3,4 slots. After that gtx 980ti became much faster, but I was not satisfied. I replace 980Ti with gt220 and my machine finaly became fast as I expect. In the meantime, I got 4 more modules. Unfortunately performance wasn‘t better. Mac os still don‘t recognize automaticly all 8 memory slots and I have to map slots in clover. Today I orderd new graphic card gigabyte R938XG1. If it would work better, I‘ll get one more card and make crossfire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Hi All 10.12 5960x patched worked to 10.11.6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onmybikedrunk Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 Is anybody out there using the 6900K and having the following issue? I can't get it to boot unless I used a FakeCPUID that I used with my 5930K. I'm really confused by it... Any help would be appreciated! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apero Posted August 23, 2016 Share Posted August 23, 2016 Hey guys,I am fighting with trying to boot from USB to go to the installer since weeks now I can't seem to find what is wrong. I am still stuck with Yosemite 10.10.2 since 1+ year. Anybody made it work with same motherboard / cpu ? My specs: GA-X99-UD4 5960X 64Gb Ram 2 SSD drives 4 HDD (2 in RAID1 / 2 in RAID 0) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 4095 MB with 2 Dell UltraSharp 27" WQHD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts