Balamut Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Whats issues? I've been using clover with x99-e ws with 5830 for the past 5 month, haven't seen any issues Word of warning, the WS has done compatibility issues with the uefi version of clover. You may end up having to use the legacy version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiethemorris Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Whats issues? I've been using clover with x99-e ws with 5830 for the past 5 month, haven't seen any issues It seems to have more problems with the mem map than other boards, some people have had 0 issues as long as they use the proper efi drivers, others have had constant issues and have stopped using the true efi bootloader. That's about all I know as I don't own the board. Perhaps the people having problems are just missing something, idk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motionworks Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I have X99-E WS with 5960x and i get constant reboot with clover UEFI. I successfully installed El Capitan with clover legacy but i have retuned to Yosemite because of tons of problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenightflyer Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I have X99-E WS with 5960x and i get constant reboot with clover UEFI. I successfully installed El Capitan with clover legacy but i have retuned to Yosemite because of tons of problems. it's strange...i installed it with augustopaulo guide, i'm now with EC same conf like yours + TB card and everything works perfectly, Clover UEFI too.. maybe you didn't set bios correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted June 9, 2016 Author Share Posted June 9, 2016 motionworks and thenightflyer Do you use the same BIOS versions ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenightflyer Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 motionworks and thenightflyer Do you use the same BIOS versions ? I use the last version...3101 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motionworks Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I use 3102. I couldn't find bios download at this site. They removed i think.https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/X99E_WS/HelpDesk_Download/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenightflyer Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I use 3102. I couldn't find bios download at this site. They removed i think. https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/X99E_WS/HelpDesk_Download/ Select DOS as OS and you will find it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motionworks Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 Select DOS as OS and you will find it Thank you and sorry mine was 1302. I will update now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
son01490517 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Thank you sir. Your kext to patch solves "Pci begin" problem for Dell Precision 5810 with E5 2630v3 SMBIOS: Mac Pro 6,1 - npci=0x3000, osx 10.11.5. Need Voodoo TSC sync or cpus=1. Cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted June 12, 2016 Author Share Posted June 12, 2016 Thanks for letting us know about the E5 2630v3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string>5960X 10.12</string> <key>Disabled</key> <false/> <key>Find</key> <data> SIH7AAAAQA== </data> <key>Name</key> <string>IOPCIFamily</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> SIH7AAAAgA== </data> </dict> I used this to fix it for the new macos. it's not the same as Brumbaer's patch! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmano Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Thanks Brumbaer 5960X patch for x99. I have x99gaming g1 wifi I like this board.G1 support auto overclock.You can see OC button in back panel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted June 15, 2016 Author Share Posted June 15, 2016 <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string>5960X 10.12</string> <key>Disabled</key> <false/> <key>Find</key> <data> SIH7AAAAQA== </data> <key>Name</key> <string>IOPCIFamily</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> SIH7AAAAgA== </data> </dict> I used this to fix it for the new macos. it's not the same as Brumbaer's patch! It's the same patch. Same test, same place - different byte code though. Anyway, many thanks for publishing it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It's the same patch. Same test, same place - different byte code though. Anyway, many thanks for publishing it. Yes, same function but the register and compare involved had changed. All rep goes to Brumbaer for finding the problem! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted June 15, 2016 Author Share Posted June 15, 2016 Sorry, I phrased that badly. I wasn't talking about the "rep", I wanted to point out that it is virtually the same piece of code and that Apple didn't address the problem. Registers have changed, the address is of course different, - recompiling the same source with a different compiler and/or settings could lead to that, even without source changes - but the "logic" of the test and it's surroundings hasn't changed, so we are stuck with the same problem and not confronted with a new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Yep, it's really weird. I expected NUMA support and new MacPro with dual E5 v4. Instead, we got some ridiculous Siri. xD And let's not forget, the ability to beam, all your docs and everything you're working on, to NSA. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumbaer Posted June 15, 2016 Author Share Posted June 15, 2016 I copied your patch over to the first post, so it will be found more easily. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edkroket Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string>5960X 10.12</string> <key>Disabled</key> <false/> <key>Find</key> <data> SIH7AAAAQA== </data> <key>Name</key> <string>IOPCIFamily</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> SIH7AAAAgA== </data> </dict> I used this to fix it for the new macos. it's not the same as Brumbaer's patch! Thanks I will try this later this week on my system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axehomeyg Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Hey guys. I wanted to give some credit to the members of this thread. I was following along with tutorials from the TM site, but, I used Brumbaer's patch from this thread to get my 5930K working. It also works for my 6950X (yeah, Broadwell-e)! So, thanks. I'll post my geek bench for the 6950K. I'll try to get the scores up in the next few days and report back with any tweaks that I ended up doing. Thanks y'all! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsusFreak Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Don't know why anyone need's this patch to get a 5930K working, but $1750.00 for a unsupported CPU could be a interesting topic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGGAX Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 36K on 32bit tryout geekbench....i wonder if he use the 64-bit geekbench...it must be crazy near 40K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsusFreak Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Anyone that can afford that cpu can probably spring for a GB license. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balamut Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 If I can ever managed to get the v4s the numbers will be even more crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axehomeyg Posted June 17, 2016 Share Posted June 17, 2016 Anyone that can afford that cpu can probably spring for a GB license. Seemed better than buying a Mac Pro with 3yr-old hardware for even more! I basically inherited a gigantic Mac/Xcode project and compile times are horrendous enough that it'll pay for itself over the rMBP that I've been using. Re: geekbench, good call. Here is the 64-bit. I don't expect to be doing much benchmarking, but, $14 is aight. Here ya go... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts