maleorderbride Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 I applied the patch but I am low score See: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/653574 What BIOS CPU settings are you using? A screenshot of Intel Power Gadget while Cinebench CPU test is running would be helpful. Edit: are you sure your scores are low? You used Geekbench 4, which has ~30% lower scores by design than Geekbench 3. Your CPU might be performing as it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t1ago Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 What BIOS CPU settings are you using? A screenshot of Intel Power Gadget while Cinebench CPU test is running would be helpful. Edit: are you sure your scores are low? You used Geekbench 4, which has ~30% lower scores by design than Geekbench 3. Your CPU might be performing as it should. BIOS Settings: EIST/C1E/C3/C6/C7 - Enable The correct would be 22000~23000 in Geekbench 4, see: https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/605038 Not use: FakeCPUID, NullCPU ... Cinebench score: 910, correct would be 1100~1150, 4.2ghz OC Intel Power Gadget dont work, only Sandybrigde CPUs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew82 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 BIOS Settings: EIST/C1E/C3/C6/C7 - Enable The correct would be 22000~23000 in Geekbench 4. Not use: FakeCPUID, NullCPU ... Cinebench score: 910, correct would be 1100~1150, 4.2ghz OC Intel Power Gadget dont work, only Sandybrigde CPUs Try this config and ssdt for 5820k. https://www.dropbox.com/s/uyab0g3jw29d8es/5820.zip?dl=0 Working on El Capitan and Sierra 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maleorderbride Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 BIOS Settings: EIST/C1E/C3/C6/C7 - Enable The correct would be 22000~23000 in Geekbench 4, see: https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/605038 Not use: FakeCPUID, NullCPU ... Cinebench score: 910, correct would be 1100~1150, 4.2ghz OC Intel Power Gadget dont work, only Sandybrigde CPUs I will reply to you in the other thread that is dedicated to XCPM with Haswell-E/P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t1ago Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 I will reply to you in the other thread that is dedicated to XCPM with Haswell-E/P. I use XCPM + 5820k (Haswell-E), GA-X99-UD3P and 4x4GB DDR4 2800mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t1ago Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Try this config and ssdt for 5820k. https://www.dropbox.com/s/uyab0g3jw29d8es/5820.zip?dl=0 Working on El Capitan and Sierra its work! how u gen ssdt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew82 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 its work! how u gen ssdt? https://github.com/Piker-Alpha/ssdtPRGen.sh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I have Asus X99 Deluxe and i7-5930K. My system is working with USB3 and everything, HOWEVER. I feel like my system is not performing as it should. I run El Capitan. Geekbench: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/694923- isn't 13330 a bit low for multicore performance? Is there something wrong with my powerstates? My SMBIOS is Mac Pro 6,1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenightflyer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I have Asus X99 Deluxe and i7-5930K. My system is working with USB3 and everything, HOWEVER. I feel like my system is not performing as it should. I run El Capitan. Geekbench: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/694923- isn't 13330 a bit low for multicore performance? Is there something wrong with my powerstates? My SMBIOS is Mac Pro 6,1. Did you disable EIST in bios? What is maximum value you set as core ratio? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I have Asus X99 Deluxe and i7-5930K. My system is working with USB3 and everything, HOWEVER. I feel like my system is not performing as it should. I run El Capitan. Geekbench: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/694923- isn't 13330 a bit low for multicore performance? Is there something wrong with my powerstates? My SMBIOS is Mac Pro 6,1. Have you EIST = Disable in bios? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Have you EIST = Disable in bios? Did you disable EIST in bios? What is maximum value you set as core ratio? Yes I disabled EIST. Core ratio is auto / 40 on all cores. Asus multicore ehnahcement is set to auto. C-states: auto Results after disabling Asus multicore enhancement and enabling C-states instead of auto: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/715370 still awful multicore perf. I also run AI tweaker wizard to aim for performance with a cooling rib tower setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Also I get problems when trying to generate an SSDT on my own (I got an SSDT from someone who helped me): http://pastebin.com/vY5em2Mb I set the AI Tweaker to "auto" and all the core ratios to "auto", leading to a slightly worse score. Config.plist: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2820201/config.plist Again, my system is Asus x99 Deluxe, GeForce GTX 980, Intel i7-5930k. Thanks in advance This doesn't look right: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maleorderbride Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 No, that is not right at all. Use this solution: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/315579-el-capitan-xcpm-for-x99-one-patch-solution/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 No, that is not right at all. Use this solution: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/315579-el-capitan-xcpm-for-x99-one-patch-solution/ Wow thanks! I will definitely try this when I come home. Makes sense and it confirms what I have suspected all along. Also I created a new SSDT, and use the iMac 17,1 CPU vectors to modify the MacPro 6,1 plist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammlerG Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 iMac 17,1 vectors are for Skylake. Use 15,1 or 14,2 for your CPU. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 iMac 17,1 vectors are for Skylake. Use 15,1 or 14,2 for your CPU. Thanks! I see the same macs show up in the list. Does it matter which one of the 15,1 I pick? And thanks for providing the info about the patch in that thread. Also can I just use 14,2 or 15,1 on my SMBIOS instead of MacPro 6,1 without suffering any consequences? Using MacPro 6,1 requires a patcher for the NVidia . Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammlerG Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 you can choose any one of 14,2 or 15,1. With the 17,1 plist, i´m seeing sending stepper errors at boot.With 14,2 or 15,1 all fine, no errors.But xcpm is an illusion here on X99, not really working. We only get better P-States with this patches (better than NullCpuPM kext), and can use a higher single core turbo.This is a great success, very good... butYou can check the used msrs for native PM in Windows, and then check them with xcpm.With windows, msrs 199/198 E6/E7 shows many states, active changing and frequency settings.XCPM uses only 3 real states, same as NullCpuPM kext, but better P-States and lower power in idle.Only x12, base (x30/x35...) and turbo is in use from CPU. We see this in jumping frequency with 500ms sampling rate in Intel Power Gadget, and with manually read out of the msrs in idle or when a benchmark is running.I´m not sure, but i think this 3 states are CPU/Bios related, CPU self throttling and not active set from xcpm.For my system, i can use any generated SSDT for my CPU, set turbo, set turbo false, standard..... makes no difference.I´m getting always max CPU frequency, no active msr settings and no flat idle at x12.The Kernel must have another check for CPU/Chipset (in the xcpm code????) we don´t see.All modern 4 core CPUs can use xcpm native, a CPU with more than 4 cores not.Disabling cores in Bios does not help, so there must be a read out of an specific msr in the CPUs?I´m reading the disassembled code for hours now, but i´m no coder and it´s digging in the dark 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 Interesting! I am a coder, but not very good with assembly, nor do I know where to look in OSX Seems like you are on to something though. But in short, I will get full performance, but fewer states that I can transition between? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad0 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/724144 It does better than windows now I ran the AI Tweaker and disabled C6 state but kept C3 enabled as in the other thread by SammlerG. Should I also enable C6 in BIOS? Also, I should watch the monitor closely if it sticks in 4 GHz. Afraid of overheat and cooking the CPU. Wonder if this is purely the patch or if it's both the patch and AI Tweaker Wizard together. FILES: SSDT, Config.plist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobenia Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 I try to install sierra over el capitan... after 2 minutes of installation and restart it boots el capitan again... after I plug-in bootable USB with sierra with clover, I can select new sierra install partition BUT after I run it, I got only black screen??? please help. elcapitan 10.11.6 intel i5960k, asus x99-a, nvidia gtx960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Deal Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Hi stinga11, Not possible to place dummy kext in clover folder? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xelanaiznac Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 hi guys! thanks to all of you, pikeralpha at first as usual. i want to ask you something about my doubt: i follow this thread but i think that there are a lot of contrasting info. (someone uses fakecpuid, someon else says to generate p and c Staes from clover, someone else need okrasit patch for full cpu speed etc etc) here what i did: in bios, apply overclock at 4.5ghz for my 5960x at 1.25vcore stable. eist disabled than i applied imac14,2 vectorlist and then i prepared a ssdt with piker script (I'm using macpro6,1 sysdef) the issue is that intelpowergadget says that my cpu draws 35watt or more in idle.this value was the same (27-28w)with default cpu frequencies (so not depends on overclock) i attached here my clover efi folder, so you can have a look. i tried even dropping cpupm tables, but nothing changes. tried with both fakelpc enabled or disabled (is it needed for haswell-e?). can you please help me? CLOVER.zip appleintelinfo.rtf terminale 1.rtf config.plist.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davirus Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Even with the script generated SSDT.aml is it possible (and safe) to overclock the CPU beyond the data inside the .aml? Also, this part is quite confusing: "e. Run again the ssdtPRGen.sh using the board-id of iMac14,2 to get C7 state:" The Asus X99 A2 says the 5820k doesn't have C7 state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davirus Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 BIOS Settings: EIST/C1E/C3/C6/C7 - Enable The correct would be 22000~23000 in Geekbench 4, see: https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/605038 Not use: FakeCPUID, NullCPU ... Cinebench score: 910, correct would be 1100~1150, 4.2ghz OC Intel Power Gadget dont work, only Sandybrigde CPUs But the 5820K doesn't support C7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davirus Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 @onmybikedrunk here the results I get with two different configuration files, using a 46x max multiplier with BCLK set to 100: config-1.plist: no FakeCPUID, using xcmp Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 22.15.37.png config-2.plist: FakeCPUID set to 0x0306e2. NULLCPU Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 22.15.53.png I had some stability issues @47x, so I got lower scores than expected (had to boot @46x) - config.plist files attached. Please tell me if you also need to know my BIOS settings. I am using latest 10.11.4 Beta (15E39c). For me it didn't made any difference, same benchmarks using both files. http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8174684 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts