alexvictory Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Finally ! With 1010-kernel-REV-8N and 10102-UPD-Patch-pthread.kext, my Athlon 64 x2 3800+ works good with 10.10.2 and latest Security Update ! Great works and many thanks to all of you I just still have a little anoying problem with Time Sync… The clock doesn't update as it should. But I can manage that as it's not essential. which flags at startup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotcorez Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Hey. the clock problem sounds like the fsb is set incorrectly. note: cpu fsb and pci bus speed are normally linked unless you can lock/set the pci bus speed manually (impacting connected devices) did you try clover, it auto detects fsb well. maybe you just need to set your fsb manually with your current bootloader / kernel configuration? hope you work it out! btw incredible work here guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eweie Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Finally ! With 1010-kernel-REV-8N and 10102-UPD-Patch-pthread.kext, my Athlon 64 x2 3800+ works good with 10.10.2 and latest Security Update ! Great works and many thanks to all of you I just still have a little anoying problem with Time Sync… The clock doesn't update as it should. But I can manage that as it's not essential. try boot flag -cpuEFI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polyzargone Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 (edited) which flags at startup? <key>DSDT</key> <string>/Extra/DSDT2.aml</string> <key>EthernetBuiltIn</key> <string>Yes</string> <key>Kernel</key> <string>/Extra/kernel8n</string> <key>Kernel Flags</key> <string>-f kext-dev-mode=1 npci=0x2000</string> Chameleon dmesg shows this : Processor Information Socket Designation: XU1 PROCESSOR Type: Central Processor Family: 0x2 Manufacturer: AMD ID: 0x40FB2 Version: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ External Clock: 199 MHz Max Speed: 1995 MHz Current Speed: 2000 MHz Upgrade: Socket AM2 Serial Number: Not Specified Asset Tag: Not Specified Part Number: Not Specified Core Count: 2 Core Enabled: 2 Thread Count: 2 Hey. the clock problem sounds like the fsb is set incorrectly. are you overclocking? did you try clover, it auto detects fsb well. maybe you need to set the fsb manually? incredible work here guys No overclocking. And yeah, I tried Clover but it won't even boot on my HP dc5750. It always stops at the Maintenance screen (or whatever his name). try boot flag -cpuEFI Thanks, I'll try this. Update : No change with this boot flag Update 2 : added fsb=800 busratio=10 in kernel flags but still no changes. BTW, is VoodooTSCSyncAMD.kext still necessary with this new Kernel ? Edited March 11, 2015 by polyzargone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpukraine Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 WYSIWIG = What You See Is What I Get !!! Still running Duran Keeley's fixes for AppStore but wondering if I still need them... You don't need them anymore) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaya80 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Please, can you explain me the correct way to update to 10.10.2?Wanna try the new kernel with 10.10.2 update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 I'll tell you why opcode64 Why do some people have and some people do not That is the Sysenter/Syscall return Address error Some people may use different versions kext cause problems For example, the display driver using an older OS kext Because I had originally intended to compile 32bit system I found that all the relevant opcode errors related sysenter 32 bit is the best way to use the patch If using a similar 10.6.3 32-bit Kernel sysenter dyld Add Source correction mode slow with only cause instability So I renounce 10.5-10.7 32-bit xnu Building Also found opcode64 / 32 problem is sysenter So if there are problems opcode64/32 error Should first check to your own add kext and Try using a Mac original kext 10.10 UDP to 10.10.2 this is pthread Function pthread_init updates kernel 10.10 Not with update must use the old Function pthread_init SO The key is pthread.kext not IOPCIFamily.kext IOPCIFamily.kext Patch Nothing to do with upgrade This is misleading new graphics card Users do not need IOPCIFamily.kext Patch AND I Ignore intel original CPU Support. i3 i5 i7 Xeon can use the original kernel AMD kernel add Support i3 i5 i7 I think it is superfluous Because a lot of intel source is modified In BSD section Even while support may also have problems 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexvictory Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Startup stop there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Hi! "Startup stop there" <-- If rc6 - work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexvictory Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 With RC6: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Maybe need reinstall system .or you try copy DVD on hdd partition and try run from hdd(DVD) ! What your CPU? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexvictory Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Я развернул систему через R-Drive и подкинул ядро. CPU Phenom II x6 1075T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Я развернул систему через R-Drive и подкинул ядро. CPU Phenom II x6 1075T. Да видимо что это проблема права. Короче лучше копировать DVD на жесткий диск и запустить от hdd и установить на другой раздел винчестера! ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexvictory Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Да видимо что это проблема права. Короче лучше копировать DVD на жесткий диск и запустить от hdd и установить на другой раздел винчестера! ) Это быть от того что система на четвертом разделе по счету? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolo62fr Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Hi unable to start yosemite 10.0.1 with RC7 kernel (black screen) no problem with RC6 and Torayicho kernel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Hi unable to start yosemite 10.0.1 with RC7 kernel (black screen) no problem with RC6 and Torayicho kernel Hi ! You use this kernel rc7 with my boot or no ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Clover no flag rc7 kernel false 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlo_67 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Bronya RC7 cpu stable kernel is fine, and also see how overclocking 4.6 that's great final cut works Adobe suite works facetime and Apple Store are fine also the temperatures in line with windows Nothing to say perfect and also the BOOT xxxxxAMD you are a Great Great job 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 hi carlo_67 ! Your cpu-x show wrong multiplier , because you no used my boot )) Try use my boot ! )) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 true kernel rc7 and boot chameleon 2594 développement 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 For info: that particular boot file did not work on my Paxville system: got straight into a memory error and "System halted". But "regular" Chameleon boot file worked ok. Tnx for info ! I fix … )) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlo_67 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsl Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 (edited) HA HA ..... Thread 0 Crashed: 0 dyld 0x8fe5dbcf _sysenter_trap + 3 1 dyld 0x8fe5caaf mach_init + 26 2 dyld 0x8fe3619c dyldbootstrap::start(macho_header const*, int, char const**, long, macho_header const*, unsigned long*) + 278 3 dyld 0x8fe36047 _dyld_start + 71 I've said These errors are related to the relevant sysenter Users must check their own add kext Cross versions use on the problem I have read axmanA posts this IOPCIFamily is 10.9.2 Ver You use the 10.9.2 kext apply at 10.10 Then say:This is the kernel of the problem This is simply a user problem If you do not want opcode64 You must use the 10.10 version patch This has nothing to do with the kernel I can confirm that his perception is wrong You can upload the 10.9.2 IOPCIFamily.kext Patch I can make a 10.10 patch This has nothing to do with the kernel confirmed From the Forum is open Many documents have been unable to download Can you make a 10.10.x patch for IOPCIFamily.kext, AppleACPIPlatform.kext & AppleAHCIPort.kext ? I need it for my AMD hackintosh (Athlon 64 x2 3800+ CPU in Acer Power M8) because it always stuck after "PCI configuration begin" in 10.9.5 and 10.10.1 which can not be solved by boot flag with npci=0x2000 or npci=0x3000, etc. Applied "no pci kext" patched by carlo_67 solved my problem in 10.9.5, but it was not working in 10.10.1. http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/file/186-no-npci0xxxx/ The original post is #5155 at: http://www.insanelym...on-amd/page-258 By the way thanks for your excellent kernels (esp. 8N version) posted here which are working perfectly in other AMD Hackintosh of mine in Asus M3A (Phenom x4 9850 CPU) and Asus M4A78 Plus (Athlon 64 x2 6000+ CPU). Edit: Eventually solved today. Post #1118 at: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302075-amd-yosemite-kernel-testing-for-help-use-the-help-topic/page-56 Edited March 14, 2015 by jsl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolo62fr Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Hi ! You use this kernel rc7 with my boot or no ? no I've used only the kernel file I will try with the boot file too and back to you here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsl Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 I have no problem, but first upload your 10.9.x patch let me analysis That's I got from carlo_67. no Npci=.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts