Bronya Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Update: Please try kernel_10.8.5_rc7 with my bootloader, and check cpu-x from my bootloader on FX and Cabini and etc! xnu-2050.48.11_10.8.5_rc7.zip .zip 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 En virtualisant SL 10.6 ? l'erreur existe déjà ! il est intéressant de voir que le problème des mélanges information des divers bus ne datent pas de maintenant , avec SL kernel Nawcom le problème existe déjà , cette valeur de 25 Mhz correspond à quoi ? le bus HPET fonctionnant entre 35 et 36 Mhz , ce n'est pas ça . le problème est plus profond .................. By virtualizing SL 10.6? the error already exists! it is interesting to see that the problem of informing the various mixtures bus did not begin now with SL kernel Nawcom the problem already exists, this value corresponds to 25 Mhz what? HPET the bus operating between 35 and 36 MHz, this is not it. the problem is deeper .................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 gils83, this from my boot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 En virtualisant SL 10.6 ? l'erreur existe déjà ! il est intéressant de voir que le problème des mélanges information des divers bus ne datent pas de maintenant , avec SL kernel Nawcom le problème existe déjà , cette valeur de 25 Mhz correspond à quoi ? le bus HPET fonctionnant entre 35 et 36 Mhz , ce n'est pas ça . le problème est plus profond .................. By virtualizing SL 10.6? the error already exists! it is interesting to see that the problem of informing the various mixtures bus did not begin now with SL kernel Nawcom the problem already exists, this value corresponds to 25 Mhz what? HPET the bus operating between 35 and 36 MHz, this is not it. the problem is deeper .................. Last login: Mon Feb 23 10:03:24 on ttys000 Torachiyoteki-iMac:~ Torachiyo$ sysctl machdep.cpumachdep.cpu.max_basic: 5 machdep.cpu.max_ext: 2147483675 machdep.cpu.vendor: AuthenticAMD machdep.cpu.brand_string: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 270 Processor machdep.cpu.family: 16 machdep.cpu.model: 6 machdep.cpu.extmodel: 0 machdep.cpu.extfamily: 1 machdep.cpu.stepping: 3 machdep.cpu.feature_bits: 395049983 8396809 machdep.cpu.extfeature_bits: 4022598655 538623 machdep.cpu.signature: 1052515 machdep.cpu.brand: 0 machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 HTT SSE3 MON CX16 POPCNT machdep.cpu.extfeatures: SYSCALL 1GBPAGE EM64T LAHF RDTSCP TSCI machdep.cpu.logical_per_package: 2 machdep.cpu.cores_per_package: 2 machdep.cpu.microcode_version: 0 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_min: 64 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_max: 64 machdep.cpu.mwait.extensions: 3 machdep.cpu.mwait.sub_Cstates: 0 machdep.cpu.cache.linesize: 64 machdep.cpu.cache.L2_associativity: 16 machdep.cpu.cache.size: 1024 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.small: 32 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.large: 16 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.small: 48 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.small_level1: 512 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.large: 48 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.large_level1: 128 machdep.cpu.address_bits.physical: 48 machdep.cpu.address_bits.virtual: 48 machdep.cpu.core_count: 2 machdep.cpu.thread_count: 2 Last login: Sun Feb 22 21:52:23 on console Torachiyoteki-iMac:~ Torachiyo$ sysctl machdep.cpu machdep.cpu.max_basic: 1 machdep.cpu.max_ext: 2147483672 machdep.cpu.vendor: AuthenticAMD machdep.cpu.brand_string: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ machdep.cpu.family: 15 machdep.cpu.model: 47 machdep.cpu.extmodel: 2 machdep.cpu.extfamily: 0 machdep.cpu.stepping: 0 machdep.cpu.feature_bits: 126614527 1 machdep.cpu.extfeature_bits: 3821272063 1 machdep.cpu.signature: 135152 machdep.cpu.brand: 0 machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SSE3 machdep.cpu.extfeatures: SYSCALL EM64T LAHF TSCI machdep.cpu.cores_per_package: 1 machdep.cpu.microcode_version: 0 machdep.cpu.cache.linesize: 64 machdep.cpu.cache.L2_associativity: 16 machdep.cpu.cache.size: 512 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.small: 32 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.large: 8 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.small: 32 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.small_level1: 512 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.large: 8 machdep.cpu.address_bits.physical: 40 machdep.cpu.address_bits.virtual: 48 machdep.cpu.core_count: 1 machdep.cpu.thread_count: 1 K8 miss Instruction: HTT MON CX16 POPCNT 1GBPAGE RDTSCP CX16 = CMPXCHG16B CPU Missing CX16 INS Unable to install 10.9 SO 10.9 & 10.10 don’t support the old processor (AMD:K8 754 & 939 Intel: P4 SSE2 CPU ) If the Processor supports CX16 Must Exist SSE3 instruction set So SSE3 EMU on the OS X 10.9 & 10.10 = Garbage Can only be used in the prior version 10.9 After 10.9 don‘t require This CPU-X problem AMD Family 0f-14(K8 K10) CPUID table & Family 15 16 (K15...) different SO Don‘t waste time on CPU-X 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsl Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 K8 miss Instruction: HTT MON CX16 POPCNT 1GBPAGE RDTSCP CX16 = CMPXCHG16B CPU Missing CX16 INS Unable to install 10.9 SO 10.9 & 10.10 don’t support the old processor (AMD:K8 754 & 939 Intel: P4 SSE2 CPU ) If the Processor supports CX16 Must Exist SSE3 instruction set So SSE3 EMU on the OS X 10.9 & 10.10 = Garbage Can only be used in the prior version 10.9 After 10.9 don‘t require This CPU-X problem AMD Family 0f-14(K8 K10) CPUID table & Family 15 16 (K15...) different SO Don‘t waste time on CPU-X I have found that 10.9 & 10.10 always got invalid user opemu 64 errors and frozen in my K8 939-pin CPU's MB during booting since 1 year ago. But unable to figure out why and the solution up to now. If lack of CX16 is the cause of failure, I should give up now. BTW is it possible to install 10.8.x for those lack of CX16 CPU's MB ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 I have found that 10.9 & 10.10 always got invalid user opemu 64 errors and frozen in my K8 939-pin CPU's MB during booting since 1 year ago. But unable to figure out why and the solution up to now. If lack of CX16 is the cause of failure, I should give up now. BTW is it possible to install 10.8.x for those lack of CX16 CPU's MB ? 10.8.5 tested on the K8 939 invalid kernel opcode (64-bit): 48 8B 08 …. 48 8B 08 = mov rcx qword [ds:rax] this is REX X86 OPcode K8 939 Don't support the REX Opcode OPEMU emulation SSSE3 REX Only if Add REX X86 Workload is huge I do not have time to deal with 939 on the Lion 10.7.5 Can Works 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsl Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 (edited) 10.8.5 tested on the K8 939 invalid kernel opcode (64-bit): 48 8B 08 …. 48 8B 08 = mov rcx qword [ds:rax] this is REX X86 OPcode K8 939 Don't support the REX Opcode OPEMU emulation SSSE3 REX Only if Add REX X86 Workload is huge I do not have time to deal with 939 on the Lion 10.7.5 Can Works Thanks for your prompt reply and help. What did these errors mean and is there any solution to fix them ? (1) invalid user opcode 64: 98 44 c1 8f ff 7f 00 00 2b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (2) Invalid user opcode (64-bit): f0 48 0f c7 0f 75 ef 5b c3 0f Edited February 23, 2015 by jsl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 Thanks for your prompt reply and help. What did these errors mean and is there any solution to fix them ? (1) invalid user opcode 64: 98 44 c1 8f ff 7f 00 00 2b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (2) Invalid user opcode (64-bit): f0 48 0f c7 0f 75 ef 5b c3 0f (1) invalid user opcode 64: 98 44 c1 8f ff 7f 00 00 2b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (2) Invalid user opcode (64-bit): f0 48 0f c7 0f 75 ef 5b c3 0f 1. IS Old OPEMU Version 98 44 c1 8f ff 7f 00 00 This is RIP 0x00007fff8fc14498 Not OPcode 2. Is Me Version: instruction encoding directly show The first code : F0 48 0F C7 0F lock cmpxchg16b qword [ds:rdi] This Is CX16 opcode This display mode I'm easy to debug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyh3im Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 Tora Chi Yo 1010-REV-8L.zip kernel: v1no opcode error. v2 opcode error.Bronya xnu-2050.48.11_10.8.5_rc7.zip .zip kernel: no opcode error. chameleon r2538 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 gils83, this from my boot? Use Clover 2695 mode uefi for Yosemite and chameleon 2510 for ML 10.8.5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 Use Clover 2695 mode uefi for Yosemite and chameleon 2510 for ML 10.8.5 Ok , please try my boot in archive xnu-2050.48.11_10.8.5_rc7.zip And check cpu-x and screenshot ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 for old CPU is no problem my Phenom 555 / Pentium D 915 and Sempron LE 1250 works good , the value bus is true the fsb is 200 Mhz and no 100 Mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 Ok , please try my boot in archive xnu-2050.48.11_10.8.5_rc7.zip And check cpu-x and screenshot ! Audio crackle frequency ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico joe Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 iCloud .. AMD .. Yosemite ..... ... must login in the intel machine with genuine kernel ... after login .. replace the kernel with amd kernel .. rebuild cache and put back in AMD machine .. Done 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 yeah !! good job pico joe with Clover or Chameleon ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Tora Chi Yo 1010-REV-8L.zip kernel: v1 no opcode error. v2 opcode error. Bronya xnu-2050.48.11_10.8.5_rc7.zip .zip kernel: no opcode error. chameleon r2538 Try Replace chameleon 2468 & open Terminal : sysctl machdep.cpu and TEST it 1010-REV-8M.zip 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyh3im Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Try Replace chameleon 2468 & open Terminal : sysctl machdep.cpu and TEST it I tested your kernel with 2 bootloaders 2468 and 2538. And i have opcode error though in 2468 there's different one it's invalid user opcode (64-bit): 0f 0b 8b 47 08 3d ff ff ff 7f. I have no chameleon modules and my smbios is MacPro3,1 if it helps. Also i think system works slower with kernel8m on 2468 rev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico joe Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Hi gils83 ... I'm using with clover bootloader, not yet try with chameleon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Hi gils83 ... I'm using with clover bootloader, not yet try with chameleon ok thanks look https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2gdjPNwgRM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragediana150 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Guys!! I would really love to test your kernels again, but I can't. So little help from your side would be useful This is my thread http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/304651-yosemite-10100-no-mouse-freezing/ For now I can boot with the newest kernel from Tora Chi Yo 8C...D etc. and Bronya RC5 but this is only boot test and then freeze. Thanks for the hard work for Coders. Thanks Bronya, thanks Tora Chi Yo, and I am sorry for my absence for a long time 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user78405 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 i going switch to Intel setup that might be a difference between AMD FX setup on GPU performance and i discover that Bronya kernels are way better for AMDfx but kernels like Tora Chi Yo, gils work is total BS !!!!!!!!!! to me excuse my french but that is the truth your kernels didn't improve nothing at all with any high end AMD Cpu's where back to square one to Bronya Rc4 level..what total nonsense with SSEPlus and Rtclock, EFIclock... its a waste of time , we all need to concertrate why on earth i getting less GPU memory bandwidth on Yosemite...i believe has to do with GPu drivers are more {censored} on Yosemite or its the AMDfx..so i going to find out with Intel setup if its yosemite problem or bad kernels 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ameris_cyning Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Is there any way to introduce a fix for the NPCI flag in the kernel itself? We could use a patched AppleHDA with our rigs, but not if we use that damn flag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 good job maestro !! audio fix fsb fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meowthra Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 I tested your kernel with 2 bootloaders 2468 and 2538. And i have opcode error though in 2468 there's different one it's invalid user opcode (64-bit): 0f 0b 8b 47 08 3d ff ff ff 7f. I have no chameleon modules and my smbios is MacPro3,1 if it helps. Also i think system works slower with kernel8m on 2468 rev. TEST Target : K8 Athlon64 X2 TEST IT Your nForce 630a Chipset Same with me You can test my new version 1.0.5 Startup Time Delay Too Slow FIX http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/304768-applenforceata-105/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpukraine Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 TEST Target : K8 Athlon64 X2 TEST IT Your nForce 630a Chipset Same with me You can test my new version 1.0.5 Startup Time Delay Too Slow FIX http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/304768-applenforceata-105/ V1: opcode error V2: opcode error Continue to use V2 of 1010-REV-8L. The best for me now) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts