Slice Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 4 hours ago, helmi100 said: Is Clover compatible to the new Intel Z690 chipset ? I want to upgrade my build (Intel Z370) with an ASUS Z690 motherboard with an INTEL 12900K on it. What settings do I have to make ? Clover is compatible with 690 chipset and with AlderLake CPU. But this doesn't mean you will have a success. Try the quirk ProvideCurrentCpuInfo. Use FakeCPUID. Do you have a discrete videocard? The Intel embedded graphics can't works and you should choose SMBIOS without IGPU. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaLd0n Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 5 hours ago, helmi100 said: Is Clover compatible to the new Intel Z690 chipset use this efi folder https://tinyurl.com/2weumujs from here https://www.olarila.com/topic/5676-hackintosh-efi-folders-for-all-chipsets-clover-and-opencore/ 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helmi100 Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 20 hours ago, Slice said: Clover is compatible with 690 chipset and with AlderLake CPU. But this doesn't mean you will have a success. Try the quirk ProvideCurrentCpuInfo. Use FakeCPUID. Do you have a discrete videocard? The Intel embedded graphics can't works and you should choose SMBIOS without IGPU. @ slice Thank you for the reply and your efforts for providing us with the excellent clover bootloader. Yes I'm aware, that the embedded graphics won't function. So I'll use the Radeon VII GPU from my old build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 On 5/17/2022 at 9:07 AM, Slice said: I never got reports and dumps about the issue and I can't check by myself to know what is the problem. Will it be enough to know that first reboot to "...Install Mac OS...", second and next reboots to "...Mac OS via Preboot..."? ! Sorry, maybe I didn't understand with the translation! yes none of my (hackintosh) Legacy pc can get a full install or even update with Clover in BigSur or Monterey 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jief_Machak Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 On 5/1/2022 at 3:25 PM, Matgen84 said: Hi @Slice Maybe I find the issue: when I build Clover, at the same time I build CloverConfigPlistValidator before make the PKG. Strangely, I can't build CloverConfigPlistValidator : [XCODE] - Building ccpv and archive ** BUILD FAILED ** The following build commands failed: CompileC /Users/mathieu/src/Cloverbootloader/Xcode/CloverConfigPlistValidator/build/CloverConfigPlistValidator.build/Release/CloverConfigPlistValidator.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/Config_GUI.o /Users/mathieu/src/Cloverbootloader/rEFIt_UEFI/Settings/ConfigPlist/Config_GUI.cpp normal x86_64 c++ com.apple.compilers.llvm.clang.1_0.compiler (1 failure) I mistaken somewhere ? Before all work fine. EDIT Same issue with Buildme script: can't build CloverConfigPlistValidator. CCPV OutPut 7.5 kB · 4 downloads Fixed. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jief_Machak Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 I can't find the post, but sorry for the unused var TmpGuid. I forgot to compile release before commiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matxpa Posted May 22, 2022 Share Posted May 22, 2022 On 5/20/2022 at 12:13 PM, Jief_Machak said: I can't find the post, but sorry for the unused var TmpGuid. I forgot to compile release before commiting. Hi Jief Look at your msg box and look for a message last Tuesday at 09:53 AM. Thanks for you commit ff01226 "Fix CCPV compilation" Greetings 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jief_Machak Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 (edited) gcc12 fix is committed. Rebuild your base tools. The missing part was in GenFW tool. Edited May 24, 2022 by Jief_Machak 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 (edited) Hello Team Laptop HP DV6 2140ef intel core i5 M430 GeForce Nvidia GT 320M 8go DDR3 SSD boot Legacy *NO SUPPORTED UEFI Clover r5146 OC 0.8.1 any suggestions to the problem between version 12.2.1 and 12.3 in processor management! Opencore can still roll Clover is very slow and does not open Chrome or Edge any advice i take I remember that the two bootloaders use the same DSDT and SSDT as arguments, SMBIOS everything is identical as possible Spoiler only in OC I use this patch more <key>Patch</key> <array> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_apfs_filevault_allowed</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Force FileVault on Broken Seal</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data></data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>com.apple.filesystems.apfs</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>uAEAAADD</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_cs_require_lv</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Disable Library Validation Enforcement</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data></data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.0.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>uAAAAADD</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_work_interval_port_type_render_server</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>MonteRand (12.1b1) #1</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>D8fxc/sh8TnRc/WJyUiLlM3Q/f//</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>3900</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>McmQkJAh8TnRc/WJyUiLlM3Q/f//</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_panic_with_thread_context</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>MonteRand (12.1b1) #2</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>D8fyc/uD4g+D+gd38w+3NEE=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>10100</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>MdKQkJCD4g+D+gd38w+3NEE=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_early_random</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>SurPlus v1 - PART 1 of 2 - Patch read_erandom (inlined in _early_random)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AHQjSIs=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>800</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.1.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AOsjSIs=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_register_and_init_prng</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>SurPlus v1 - PART 2 of 2 - Patch register_and_init_prng</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>ukgBAAAx9g==</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>256</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.1.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>ukgBAADrBQ==</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string></string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Reroute kern.hv_vmm_present patch (1)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AGRpcmVjdF9oYW5kb2ZmAEVuYWJsZSBkaXJlY3QgaGFuZG9mZiBmb3IgcmVhbHRpbWUgdGhyZWFkcwA=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AGh2X3ZtbV9wcmVzZW50AEVuYWJsZSBkaXJlY3QgaGFuZG9mZiBmb3IgcmVhbHRpbWUgdGhyZWFkcwA=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string></string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Reroute kern.hv_vmm_present patch (2)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AGh2X2Rpc2FibGUAaHZfdm1tX3ByZXNlbnQA</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AGh2X2Rpc2FibGUAZGlyZWN0X2hhbmRvZmYA</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> </array> Edited May 24, 2022 by PG7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 3 hours ago, PG7 said: Hello Team Laptop HP DV6 2140ef intel core i5 M430 GeForce Nvidia GT 320M 8go DDR3 SSD boot Legacy *NO SUPPORTED UEFI Clover r5146 OC 0.8.1 any suggestions to the problem between version 12.2.1 and 12.3 in processor management! Opencore can still roll Clover is very slow and does not open Chrome or Edge any advice i take I remember that the two bootloaders use the same DSDT and SSDT as arguments, SMBIOS everything is identical as possible Reveal hidden contents only in OC I use this patch more <key>Patch</key> <array> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_apfs_filevault_allowed</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Force FileVault on Broken Seal</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data></data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>com.apple.filesystems.apfs</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>uAEAAADD</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_cs_require_lv</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Disable Library Validation Enforcement</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data></data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.0.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>uAAAAADD</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_work_interval_port_type_render_server</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>MonteRand (12.1b1) #1</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>D8fxc/sh8TnRc/WJyUiLlM3Q/f//</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>3900</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>McmQkJAh8TnRc/WJyUiLlM3Q/f//</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_panic_with_thread_context</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>MonteRand (12.1b1) #2</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>D8fyc/uD4g+D+gd38w+3NEE=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>10100</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>21.2.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>MdKQkJCD4g+D+gd38w+3NEE=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_early_random</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>SurPlus v1 - PART 1 of 2 - Patch read_erandom (inlined in _early_random)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AHQjSIs=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>800</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.1.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AOsjSIs=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string>_register_and_init_prng</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>SurPlus v1 - PART 2 of 2 - Patch register_and_init_prng</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>ukgBAAAx9g==</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>256</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>21.1.0</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>ukgBAADrBQ==</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string></string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Reroute kern.hv_vmm_present patch (1)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AGRpcmVjdF9oYW5kb2ZmAEVuYWJsZSBkaXJlY3QgaGFuZG9mZiBmb3IgcmVhbHRpbWUgdGhyZWFkcwA=</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AGh2X3ZtbV9wcmVzZW50AEVuYWJsZSBkaXJlY3QgaGFuZG9mZiBmb3IgcmVhbHRpbWUgdGhyZWFkcwA=</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Arch</key> <string>x86_64</string> <key>Base</key> <string></string> <key>Comment</key> <string>Reroute kern.hv_vmm_present patch (2)</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data>AGh2X2Rpc2FibGUAaHZfdm1tX3ByZXNlbnQA</data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data></data> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string></string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>20.4.0</string> <key>Replace</key> <data>AGh2X2Rpc2FibGUAZGlyZWN0X2hhbmRvZmYA</data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data></data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> </array> Show please Clover boot-log amy be I'll se what is the problem. @Jief_Machak gcc12 compilation [DLINK] CLOVERX64 lto-wrapper: warning: using serial compilation of 26 LTRANS jobs lto-wrapper: note: see the '-flto' option documentation for more information [OBJCOPY] CLOVERX64 [GENFW] CLOVERX64 FIXME reminder : __cxa_pure_virtual is undefined -> ignored. This is happening since gcc 12.1 for unknown reasons. Generating DUETEFIMAINFVX64 FV ### GUID cross reference file can be found at /Users/sergey/src/CloverBootloader/Build/Clover/RELEASE_GCC53/FV/Guid.xref FV Space Information DUETEFIMAINFVX64 [29%Full] 2752512 (0x2a0000) total, 815656 (0xc7228) used, 1936856 (0x1d8dd8) free - Done - Build end time: 20:11:31, May.24 2022 Build total time: 00:05:05 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/920500/what-is-the-purpose-of-cxa-pure-virtual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jief_Machak Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Slice said: FIXME reminder : __cxa_pure_virtual is undefined -> ignored. This is happening since gcc 12.1 for unknown reasons. Yes, it is still strange that that symbol stays undefined. The one we define is NOT linked ! It's anyway a crash handler, so that's not too bad to ignore. But I'd like to keep a reminder to understand one day. Might as well be a gcc bug. 4 minutes ago, Slice said: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/920500/what-is-the-purpose-of-cxa-pure-virtual They say that "The Arduino IDE manages to avoid the linker error when building some programs because it compiles with the options "-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections" and links with "-Wl,--gc-sections", which drops some references to unused symbols." We have that and the reference is still there. I'll investigate. Edited May 24, 2022 by Jief_Machak 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 Other interesting idea from stackoverflow Quote You may get this error when using the gcc command where you should be using g++; I've done it at least once 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Slice said: Show please Clover boot-log amy be I'll se what is the problem Spoiler Timestamp .textClippingSystem logs hackintoolpreboot.logboot logs hackintool2022-05-24_19-55_CLOVERX64.EFI.log0-100 0-100 MemLog inited,.textClipping 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 10 hours ago, PG7 said: Hide contents Timestamp .textClipping 3.52 MB · 0 downloads System logs hackintool 866.97 kB · 0 downloads preboot.log 75.18 kB · 1 download boot logs hackintool 75 kB · 0 downloads 2022-05-24_19-55_CLOVERX64.EFI.log 91.96 kB · 0 downloads 0-100 0-100 MemLog inited,.textClipping 316.37 kB · 0 downloads First doubt I see 3:283 0:000 The CPU not supported RDRAND For this reason there are kernel patches 14:212 0:005 - [03]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:214 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:216 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 14:218 0:002 - [04]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:220 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:222 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 16:224 2:002 Will not patch boot.efi 16:227 0:002 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 16:230 0:003 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 Looks like OK. But I have a doubt the patch is still actual for new Monterey. We should double check if the pattern is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5T33Z0 Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 The latest gcc12-based build is working fine over here on my notebook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 16 hours ago, Slice said: First doubt I see 3:283 0:000 The CPU not supported RDRAND For this reason there are kernel patches 14:212 0:005 - [03]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:214 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:216 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 14:218 0:002 - [04]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:220 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:222 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 16:224 2:002 Will not patch boot.efi 16:227 0:002 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 16:230 0:003 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 Looks like OK. But I have a doubt the patch is still actual for new Monterey. We should double check if the pattern is the same. Hello in OpenCore if I don't apply the RDRAND patches I have a kernel panic in the case of Clover if it doesn't apply I can raise the system, if it applies too but nothing changes! if you need something to check just ask me and I'll be there for it and tests thanks in advance to you for taking the time to check I use google translator because my english is none 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 27, 2022 Share Posted May 27, 2022 On 5/17/2022 at 6:39 AM, Slice said: A year ago all users were with OpenCore and now shifted to Clover. I still don't know what is the problem with update BigSur in legacy mode. For my mind there is no problem. @Slice @Jief_Machak hello team since the departure of Big Sur until now in Monterey the installation error with Clover in bios NOT UEFI is this in the logs on all my PCs with Legacy Bios I always get this same error - in installation mode with the full installer - on updating by any other way we always have this error, already with OC it installs without problems thanks for everything google translate Historique de Programme d’installation 27-May-2022.txt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 6 hours ago, PG7 said: @Slice @Jief_Machak hello team since the departure of Big Sur until now in Monterey the installation error with Clover in bios NOT UEFI is this in the logs on all my PCs with Legacy Bios I always get this same error - in installation mode with the full installer - on updating by any other way we always have this error, already with OC it installs without problems thanks for everything google translate Historique de Programme d’installation 27-May-2022.txt 82.51 kB · 1 download AFAIK the SMBIOS model MacPro4,1 is problematic for hackintosh. Use MacPro6,1 even though your hardware is older. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 On 5/25/2022 at 9:33 AM, Slice said: First doubt I see 3:283 0:000 The CPU not supported RDRAND For this reason there are kernel patches 14:212 0:005 - [03]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:214 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:216 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 14:218 0:002 - [04]: Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 :: [OS: 12.4 | MatchOS: 12.x | MatchBuild: All] 14:220 0:002 check MatchOS 12.x 14:222 0:002 ==> allowed by OS 16:224 2:002 Will not patch boot.efi 16:227 0:002 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #1 16:230 0:003 Bridge kernel patch to OC : Monterey RDRAND instruction #2 Looks like OK. But I have a doubt the patch is still actual for new Monterey. We should double check if the pattern is the same. Yes, those patches are not applied for Monterey 12.4. It searches instruction "rdrand rcx" while new monterey uses "rdrand rax". It is bad idea to search fixed string as it is going to be changed next update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 On 5/26/2022 at 2:32 AM, PG7 said: Hello in OpenCore if I don't apply the RDRAND patches I have a kernel panic in the case of Clover if it doesn't apply I can raise the system, if it applies too but nothing changes! if you need something to check just ask me and I'll be there for it and tests thanks in advance to you for taking the time to check I use google translator because my english is none test please this KernelToPatch <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string>Monterey RDRAND instruction #3</string> <key>MatchOS</key> <string>12.x</string> <key>Disabled</key> <false/> <key>MaskFind</key> <data>/v//8P//</data> <key>Find</key> <data>SA/H8HP6</data> <key>Replace</key> <data>kJCQkJCQ</data> </dict> 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 2 hours ago, Slice said: test please this KernelToPatch Hello I did the installation with the OC where I use the RDRAND patch and it finishes the installation without problems once I have the installation on disk I can use Clover with or without RDRAND did boot test and got boot logs with Clover for you to analyze I think the problem with clover not doing the installation is with NVRAM! I'll also post the Clover config that I use and the OC config so you can see where something can be that makes a difference I use google translator may contain translation errors! Spoiler preboot-no RDRAND.logpreboot- Yes RDRAND.logconfig-oc 0.8.1.plistconfig-r5146.plist 8 hours ago, Slice said: AFAIK the SMBIOS model MacPro4,1 is problematic for hackintosh. Use MacPro6,1 even though your hardware is older. I use the BoardID with the MacPro6,1 and that I can install and update with the incompatible SMBIOS of MacPro4,1 or others this method of userpar the BoardID (Fake BoardID) I use in all Hack not supported and I have no problem being that for the installation I already tested of several SMBIOS and even so does not pass the installation with Clover! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 52 minutes ago, PG7 said: Hello I did the installation with the OC where I use the RDRAND patch and it finishes the installation without problems once I have the installation on disk I can use Clover with or without RDRAND did boot test and got boot logs with Clover for you to analyze I think the problem with clover not doing the installation is with NVRAM! I'll also post the Clover config that I use and the OC config so you can see where something can be that makes a difference I use google translator may contain translation errors! Hide contents preboot-no RDRAND.log 44.43 kB · 0 downloads preboot- Yes RDRAND.log 44.45 kB · 0 downloads config-oc 0.8.1.plist 43.33 kB · 0 downloads config-r5146.plist 31.98 kB · 0 downloads I use the BoardID with the MacPro6,1 and that I can install and update with the incompatible SMBIOS of MacPro4,1 or others this method of userpar the BoardID (Fake BoardID) I use in all Hack not supported and I have no problem being that for the installation I already tested of several SMBIOS and even so does not pass the installation with Clover! But you didn't test my new patch. #3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PG7 Posted May 28, 2022 Share Posted May 28, 2022 2 hours ago, Slice said: But you didn't test my new patch. #3 RDRAND#3 = https://www.insanelymac.com/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=381349&key=4e05fe320814d7db7f3eedd9265ea895 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts