arsradu Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 2 hours ago, vector sigma said: I like it to be "raw". Also when you call make (i.e. the make file) you have to write "make pkg" or "make iso" ... Make have no sense Why not?! It "makes" perfect (non)-sense. User: make Computer: what? User: doesn't matter. just make something! Computer: ok. Shutting down... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telepati Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 What does that mean "File System on Catalina removed. Users will be responsible to make the root filesystem read-write". And how to make the root filesystem read-write? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ricoc90 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) if (-1 == system.numericalCompare('10.14.9', system.version.ProductVersion)) I haven't worked with JS for a very long time now, so I might not fully understand the issue but what if you'd just check if the ProductVersion is Catalina or higher, something like this: var result = true; var vers = system.version.ProductVersion; if (vers.split(".")[1] >= 15) { result = false; ... } return result; } 5 minutes ago, telepati said: What does that mean "File System on Catalina removed. Users will be responsible to make the root filesystem read-write". And how to make the root filesystem read-write? sudo mount -uw / It was added to Clover's Distribution but it gives some issues, so it's been removed Edited July 16, 2019 by ricoc90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 hour ago, telepati said: What does that mean "File System on Catalina removed. Users will be responsible to make the root filesystem read-write". I was in rush, wanted to say "File System check on Catalina removed...." 2 hours ago, Badruzeus said: @vector sigma Yeah absolutely, thanks.. Sorry I was bit confusing LoL No problem . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, ricoc90 said: if (-1 == system.numericalCompare('10.14.9', system.version.ProductVersion)) I haven't worked with JS for a very long time now, so I might not fully understand the issue but what if you'd just check if the ProductVersion is Catalina or higher, something like this: var result = true; var vers = system.version.ProductVersion; if (vers.split(".")[1] >= 15) { result = false; ... } return result; } Yeah, subscripting can be a solution. Did you try your self? ok, I'll do that as soon as I can. Anyway it is not enough since we need to ensure the file system is apfs and is writable. For the fs I can just make a shell script to something like: diskutil info / | grep 'File System Personality:' | awk '{print $NF}' or just forgot about aeverything and see if the root volume is read-only: diskutil info / | grep 'Read-Only Volume:' | awk '{print $NF}' but since I'm on 10.11 at job, I can't ensure what's on Catalina. So please anyone... check the above command in Catalina with both cases (fs rw or ro) Edited July 16, 2019 by vector sigma typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, ricoc90 said: if (-1 == system.numericalCompare('10.14.9', system.version.ProductVersion)) Anyway 10.4.9 was supposed to be 0xA 0xE 0x9 (0x0a0e09) so a comparison should be easy Lol.. just in 10.13 apparently return -1 as in Catalina . P.S. being a first or the second arg makes difference, maybe this is the problem. Edited July 16, 2019 by vector sigma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ricoc90 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 hour ago, vector sigma said: diskutil info / | grep 'Read-Only Volume:' | awk '{print $NF}' but since I'm on 10.11 at job, I can't ensure what's on Catalina. So please anyone... check the above command in Catalina with both cases (fs rw or ro) Seems to work just fine so I indeed just checking if fs is RW should be sufficient Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) Why commits ☞ 5018 you have remove RW by the package Edited July 16, 2019 by chris1111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andres ZeroCross Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, chris1111 said: Why commits ☞ 5018 you have remove RW by the package Some user with HFS Partition get problem with newest clover. Can't install it on HFS Partition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Andres ZeroCross said: Some user with HFS Partition get problem with newest clover. Can't install it on HFS Partition Sorry but macOS Catalina is APFS File System and HFS+ has nothing to do with Clover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andres ZeroCross Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 minute ago, chris1111 said: Sorry but macOS Catalina is APFS File System and HFS+ has nothing to do with Clover We can ask @Badruzeus for detail of problem 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Andres ZeroCross said: We can ask @Badruzeus for detail of problem ok thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 35 minutes ago, ricoc90 said: Seems to work just fine so I indeed just checking if fs is RW should be sufficient Thaaaanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 36 minutes ago, chris1111 said: Sorry but macOS Catalina is APFS File System and HFS+ has nothing to do with Clover 1 hour ago, chris1111 said: Why commits ☞ 5018 you have remove RW by the package you just broke my hopes Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, vector sigma said: you just broke my hopes Lol Hope of what ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Sorry, I didn't follow all the posts in here about this topic, but...why was that workaround removed...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ricoc90 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) 22 minutes ago, arsradu said: Sorry, I didn't follow all the posts in here about this topic, but...why was that workaround removed...? the workaround had some issues that prevented @Badruzeus from installing Clover Edited July 16, 2019 by ricoc90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 51 minutes ago, chris1111 said: Hope of what ??? A joke . But looks like you didn't read none of the post just above yours 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 @Badruzeus I feel confident that the problem is solved in r5019..... unless the output of 'diskutil info /' differs in old Oses. Let me know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badruzeus Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 9 hours ago, vector sigma said: @Badruzeus I feel confident that the problem is solved in r5019..... unless the output of 'diskutil info /' differs in old Oses. Let me know. It works well under 10.13.6 with HFS+. Many thanks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlocks Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 @vector sigma clover installer has fusion drive installation issue of apfs. https://sourceforge.net/p/cloverefiboot/tickets/37/ https://sourceforge.net/p/cloverefiboot/tickets/519/ https://sourceforge.net/p/cloverefiboot/code/HEAD/tree/CloverPackage/package/Scripts.templates/EFIFolder/MountESP but i don't have apfs fusion drive. diskutil result https://eclecticlight.co/2018/10/15/fusion-drives-in-apfs/ thank you for latest fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 45 minutes ago, Sherlocks said: but i don't have apfs fusion drive. Sorry me as well. Will require testers 1 hour ago, Badruzeus said: It works well under 10.13.6 with HFS+. Many thanks. Thanks for the test and the patience! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ricoc90 Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 7 hours ago, vector sigma said: Sorry me as well. Will require testers I'll see if I have some spare drives to put in one of my spare systems so that I can test it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vector sigma Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 25 minutes ago, ricoc90 said: I'll see if I have some spare drives to put in one of my spare systems so that I can test it out Thanks for that, sunday I'll try to do the same.. may be we will succeded! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberdevs Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 @Sherlocks and @vector sigma and @ricoc90 I can create a fusion drive and test things as well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts