chris1111 Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Did something change between r3280 → r3292 in how Clover interacts with FakeSMC? HWMonitor normally looks like this: After upgrading to r3292, many of these readings were missing (CPU Frequency, Memory Modules, CPU Package Graphics…). Also had readings for items I clearly shouldn't have on a desktop, such as Battery. Mainboard Proximity was renamed to Northbridge Proximity. And so on. I neglected to take a screenshot of this before downgrading to r3280, which fixed it. No Issue here about the Latest HWSensors and Clover r3292 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oSxFr33k Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 FYI. If you have Clover SE installed and then try to install a Non Special Edition, the boot stalls near the end of the boot process (Ethernet/Wifi/BT) no Desktop. This has happened to me more than once in both Yosemite and El Capitan and I could not catch the pattern until just now. Maybe wiping EFI then installing may work but upgrading does not for sure!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris1111 Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 FYI. If you have Clover SE installed and then try to install a Non Special Edition, the boot stalls near the end of the boot process (Ethernet/Wifi/BT) no Desktop. This has happened to me more than once in both Yosemite and El Capitan and I could not catch the pattern until just now. Maybe wiping EFI then installing may work but upgrading does not for sure!! I think you need to read more about Clover my freind SE its a same Package, the only difference is the config.plist and FakeSMC.kext already on EFI /CLOVER/kexts I run Clover Package Source Forge on my both Pc, Laptop with no issue same with SE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 I think you need to read more about Clover my freind SE its a same Package, the only difference is the config.plist and FakeSMC.kext already on EFI /CLOVER/kexts I run Clover Package Source Forge on my both Pc, Laptop with no issue same with SE It may be other FakeSMC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oSxFr33k Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 I think you need to read more about Clover my freind SE its a same Package, the only difference is the config.plist and FakeSMC.kext already on EFI /CLOVER/kexts I run Clover Package Source Forge on my both Pc, Laptop with no issue same with SE I want to agree with you and I know they are the same but in my case every single time I install non SE over SE it does not boot period!! I can replicate this every single time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thy1225 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 anyone know how to set "only search for Sata0 drivers" ?? My setup boot ridiculously slow between the bios and the clover GUI (took about 20secs) and I'm trying to make it faster I read the clover wiki saying if I set "only search for Sata0 Drivers" can make boot time 9 seconds difference anyone know how to do that? here's the clover wiki page i mentioned. (under the "Fast" topic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oSxFr33k Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 It may be other FakeSMC Yes I am thinking it could be this. I can replicate this every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Hurt Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 anyone know how to set "only search for Sata0 drivers" ??[/size] My setup boot ridiculously slow between the bios and the clover GUI (took about 20secs) and I'm trying to make it faster[/size] I read the clover wiki saying if I set "only search for Sata0 Drivers" can make boot time 9 seconds difference[/size] anyone know how to do that? here's the clover wiki page i mentioned. (under the "Fast" topic) Select BiosBlockIO instead of SATA when installing clover. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thy1225 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Select BiosBlockIO instead of SATA when installing clover. Thanks Dr. Hurt, I just tried, but still not feeling any significant speedup. The GUI still took about 12~15s to show up, do I also have to make any other changes in the clover or BIOS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smolderas Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Thanks Dr. Hurt, I just tried, but still not feeling any significant speedup. The GUI still took about 12~15s to show up, do I also have to make any other changes in the clover or BIOS? I think you need to build clover with the option "--only-sata0". Edit: I could optimize clover to boot to OS X just in 0,75 seconds, at least it is what bdmesg reports: ... 0:701 0:000 stringlength = 5294 0:701 0:000 CurrentMode: Width=1920 Height=1080 0:701 0:000 Beginning FSInjection FSInjectionInstall ... - Our FSI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL installed on handle: CE831C98 FSInjectionInstall ... - Our FSI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL installed on handle: CE831C98 0:702 0:000 Preparing kexts injection for arch=x86_64 from EFI\CLOVER\kexts\Other 0:704 0:002 Preparing kexts injection for arch=x86_64 from EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11 0:704 0:000 Extra kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\FakeSMC.kext 0:710 0:005 Extra PlugIn kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\FakeSMC.kext\Contents\PlugIns\ACPISensors.kext 0:713 0:002 Extra PlugIn kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\FakeSMC.kext\Contents\PlugIns\CPUSensors.kext 0:715 0:002 Extra PlugIn kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\FakeSMC.kext\Contents\PlugIns\GPUSensors.kext 0:717 0:001 Extra PlugIn kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\FakeSMC.kext\Contents\PlugIns\LPCSensors.kext 0:722 0:005 Extra kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\RealtekRTL81xx.kext 0:729 0:006 Extra kext: EFI\CLOVER\kexts\10.11\realtekALC.kext 0:734 0:004 Removed efi-boot-device-data variable: Not Found 0:734 0:000 SetScreenResolution: 1920x1080 - already set 0:734 0:000 Custom boot is disabled 0:734 0:000 Closing log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 I see that the kernel patch for haswell-E (10.9.5 10.10 10.10.1) has too many information to patch, because its no necesary two patch for these cpu. I clean the patch, I don't if anyone want to merge or use. Anyway I leave here. edk2/Clover/rEFIt_UEFI/Platform/kernel_patcher.c edk2/Clover/rEFIt_UEFI/Platform/kernel_patcher.c --- edk2/Clover/rEFIt_UEFI/Platform/kernel_patcher.c +++ edk2/Clover/rEFIt_UEFI/Platform/kernel_patcher.c @@ -802,19 +802,7 @@ if (Bytes[Index] == 0x74 && Bytes[Index + 1] == 0x11 && Bytes[Index + 2] == 0x83 && Bytes[Index + 3] == 0xF8 && Bytes[Index + 4] == 0x3C) { Bytes[Index + 4] = 0x3F; - DBG("Found Haswell-E pattern #1; patched.\n"); - - if (PatchApplied) { - break; - } - - PatchApplied = TRUE; - } - - if (Bytes[Index] == 0xEB && Bytes[Index + 1] == 0x0A && Bytes[Index + 2] == 0x83 && Bytes[Index + 3] == 0xF8 && Bytes[Index + 4] == 0x3A) { - Bytes[Index + 4] = 0x3F; - - DBG("Found Haswell-E pattern #2; patched.\n"); + DBG("Found Haswell-E pattern; patched.\n"); if (PatchApplied) { break; I think I understand you. Committed to 3293. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Hey guys. I know this is a cosmetic thing, but it looks like it might be an issue with Clover. There is a rounding issue when it comes to the detected amount of VRAM and the CPU speed. They are both less by exactly 1 (MB for the VRAM, GHz for the CPU), compared to what they should be. If you forcefully inject the amount of VRAM in device-properties for example, it will show you 2048 MB for the video card. And I suppose there is a way to force the CPU to show 3.2 GHz instead of 3.19, as well. But that's not the point. The point is for the automatic detection to work on its own. And it doesn't seem to be the case here. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Below you can see a comparison between what I got on my computer, running Clover, and what it is on a real Mac (in this case it's an iMac 27" mid 2010, running Yosemite). Also, any idea how to get rid of this "ghost" volume in Clover UI? I made a mistake and launched the installer for OS X El Capitan from another partition, instead of running it from Applications. And although the installer app is neither in Applications, nor on the initial partition (since I removed it from both places), I have no idea where is this still coming from. I remember I had this issue before and there was something under the El Capitan partition. But if it's there, I couldn't find it. Any idea? It's not a big issue. But it's annoying when you don't know what's causing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRacerMaster Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Hey guys. I know this is a cosmetic thing, but it looks like it might be an issue with Clover. There is a rounding issue when it comes to the detected amount of VRAM and the CPU speed. They are both less by exactly 1 (MB for the VRAM, GHz for the CPU), compared to what they should be. If you forcefully inject the amount of VRAM in device-properties for example, it will show you 2048 MB for the video card. And I suppose there is a way to force the CPU to show 3.2 GHz instead of 3.19, as well. But that's not the point. The point is for the automatic detection to work on its own. And it doesn't seem to be the case here. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Below you can see a comparison between what I got on my computer, running Clover, and what it is on a real Mac (in this case it's an iMac 27" mid 2010, running Yosemite). Clover.png RealMac.png Also, any idea how to get rid of this "ghost" volume in Clover UI? I made a mistake and launched the installer for OS X El Capitan from another partition, instead of running it from Applications. And although the installer app is neither in Applications, nor on the initial partition (since I removed it from both places), I have no idea where is this still coming from. I remember I had this issue before and there was something under the El Capitan partition. But if it's there, I couldn't find it. Any idea? It's not a big issue. But it's annoying when you don't know what's causing it. CloverUI.png The 2047MB thing is caused the NVIDIA drivers IIRC. You can see in bdmesg how Clover detects your hardware (post it here if you want to help solve the issue). Also, look for .IABootFiles (and some file, don't remember exactly ATM) in the root of your drive and delete them if they're present. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andres ZeroCross Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Hey guys. I know this is a cosmetic thing, but it looks like it might be an issue with Clover. There is a rounding issue when it comes to the detected amount of VRAM and the CPU speed. They are both less by exactly 1 (MB for the VRAM, GHz for the CPU), compared to what they should be. If you forcefully inject the amount of VRAM in device-properties for example, it will show you 2048 MB for the video card. And I suppose there is a way to force the CPU to show 3.2 GHz instead of 3.19, as well. But that's not the point. The point is for the automatic detection to work on its own. And it doesn't seem to be the case here. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Below you can see a comparison between what I got on my computer, running Clover, and what it is on a real Mac (in this case it's an iMac 27" mid 2010, running Yosemite). Clover.png RealMac.png Also, any idea how to get rid of this "ghost" volume in Clover UI? I made a mistake and launched the installer for OS X El Capitan from another partition, instead of running it from Applications. And although the installer app is neither in Applications, nor on the initial partition (since I removed it from both places), I have no idea where is this still coming from. I remember I had this issue before and there was something under the El Capitan partition. But if it's there, I couldn't find it. Any idea? It's not a big issue. But it's annoying when you don't know what's causing it. CloverUI.png Maybe this article related to your issue Arsradu https://pikeralpha.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/how-to-replace-boot-efi-with-mine/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 The 2047MB thing is caused the NVIDIA drivers IIRC. You can see in bdmesg how Clover detects your hardware (post it here if you want to help solve the issue). Also, look for .IABootFiles (and some file, don't remember exactly ATM) in the root of your drive and delete them if they're present. Uninstalling the Nvidia drivers seems to have fixed the Graphics issue (VRAM is now 2048). Still, weird that this happens with Nvidia drivers installed but not applied. I extracted the content of bdmesg into a txt for debugging of the other issue. And there doesn't seem to be any .IABootFiles (I looked for hidden files too) anywhere on my computer. I'll keep looking. Nevermind, found them. Thank you! Since I started the installation from the Tools partition, the .IABootFiles folder was present there. bdmesg.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRacerMaster Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Maybe this article related to your issue Arsradu https://pikeralpha.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/how-to-replace-boot-efi-with-mine/ Nothing to do with this issue, or Hacks in general. This is for replacing boot.efi with Pike's (amazing work BTW, it's amazing how well a 2006 Mac Pro runs 10.11) for unsupported real Macs with 32-bit EFI (Mavericks & above need 64-bit, tiamo & Pike have made their own versions of boot.efi that thunk 32-bit EFI calls to 64-bit). Uninstalling the Nvidia drivers seems to have fixed the Graphics issue (VRAM is now 2048). Still, weird that this happens with Nvidia drivers installed but not applied. I extracted the content of bdmesg into a txt for debugging of the other issue. This is your issue: 6:928 0:000 Finally: Bus=99768kHz CPU=3193MHz For whatever reason, your base clock (BCLK) is 99.768 MHz. Multiply this by your main CPU multiplier (which, in this case, is 32x), and you get 3.193576 GHz, which is rounded to 3.19 GHz. Try setting the base clock in your BIOS to 100.05, as suggested by Piker-Alpha. This should give the correct 3.20 GHz frequency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Nothing to do with this issue, or Hacks in general. This is for replacing boot.efi with Pike's (amazing work BTW, it's amazing how well a 2006 Mac Pro runs 10.11) for unsupported real Macs with 32-bit EFI (Mavericks & above need 64-bit, tiamo & Pike have made their own versions of boot.efi that thunk 32-bit EFI calls to 64-bit). This is your issue: 6:928 0:000 Finally: Bus=99768kHz CPU=3193MHz For whatever reason, your base clock (BCLK) is 99.768 MHz. Multiply this by your main CPU multiplier (which, in this case, is 32x), and you get 3.193576 GHz, which is rounded to 3.19 GHz. Try setting the base clock in your BIOS to 100.05, as suggested by Piker-Alpha. This should give the correct 3.20 GHz frequency. Right. It is indeed set to 99.78-79MHz in EUFI Bios. But I couldn't find a way to change that. Is there? Can I do that on a non-k cpu? And why is the frequency still 3.2 GHz in Windows? ) Also, I do remember not having this issue with older versions of Clover in early stages of Yosemite (don't remember which version I was running back then). Really old one, for sure. So yes, a rounding issue. But it doesn't happen with Windows, and it didn't happen with older (really old) versions of Clover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pike R. Alpha Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Right. It is indeed set to 99.78-79MHz in EUFI Bios. But I couldn't find a way to change that. Is there? Can I do that on a non-k cpu? And why is the frequency still 3.2 GHz in Windows? ) Also, I do remember not having this issue with older versions of Clover in early stages of Yosemite (don't remember which version I was running back then). Really old one, for sure. So yes, a rounding issue. But it doesn't happen with Windows, and it didn't happen with older (really old) versions of Clover. Hi, I may be wrong, but wasn't there a config setting to correct this? Bus Frequency or something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Hi, I may be wrong, but wasn't there a config setting to correct this? Bus Frequency or something like that? Hi Pike If you're talking about this setting here then yes, there is. BUT, setting that to 100.5 (KHz) results in the following misbehaviors: 1. unbootable system (system hangs on first stage boot) 2. Clover UI and first stage booting displayed at higher than normal resolution (1600x1200 when it should be 1440x900) 3. THIS beautiful blue screen reminding me of the early ages of Windows XP. You can input 3200 as your CPU frequency in MHz, and that will force it to display 3.2 GHz instead of 3.19. But, as I said, I'm more interested to understand why doesn't it do that, on its own, rather than me tweaking/forcing it to display a certain value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsusFreak Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Hi, I may be wrong, but wasn't there a config setting to correct this? Bus Frequency or something like that? Yep, something like this fixes Clover mis-reporting... <key>CPU</key> <dict> <key>BusSpeedkHz</key> <integer>100000</integer> </dict> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsusFreak Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 The biggest problem here is user dependency on "Clover Configuator". Nice tool but not a Clover dev supported tool. Suggest you research problems here: http://clover-wiki.zetam.org/Home, http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/304530-clover-change-explanations/, and http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/284656-clover-general-discussion/page-434 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Yep, something like this fixes Clover mis-reporting... <key>CPU</key> <dict> <key>BusSpeedkHz</key> <integer>100000</integer> </dict> Ok, please, ignore my previous post. I set the bus speed in MHz, instead of KHz. My bad. Yeah, setting it to 100,000 KHz or setting the CPU frequency to 3200 MHz will show 3.2 GHz in About This Mac. But...why do we have to do this manually? I don't remember messing with this stuff before. I might be wrong though. Update: apparently setting that to 100,000 KHz affects performance. In YouTube, for example, the audio starts stuttering after about a few minutes of playback (with Safari and Flash player installed). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zxv Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 No Issue here about the Latest HWSensors and Clover r3292 Are you running 10.11.1 (15B38b)? I assume this is something related to the kernelPM patch introduced in r3292. For whatever reason, your base clock (BCLK) is 99.768 MHz. Multiply this by your main CPU multiplier (which, in this case, is 32x), and you get 3.193576 GHz, which is rounded to 3.19 GHz. Try setting the base clock in your BIOS to 100.05, as suggested by Piker-Alpha. This should give the correct 3.20 GHz frequency. Yes. I've been setting my BCLK in BIOS to 100.1 (smallest decimal allowed) for awhile now to correct this behavior. This isn't a Clover issue, and I'd be skeptical of using the BusSpeedkHz setting to resolve it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsradu Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Are you running 10.11.1 (15B38b)? I assume this is something related to the kernelPM patch introduced in r3292. Yes. I've been setting my BCLK in BIOS to 100.1 (smallest decimal allowed) for awhile now to correct this behavior. This isn't a Clover issue, and I'd be skeptical of using the BusSpeedkHz setting to resolve it. How do I set that value? Can it be set on non-k cpus?If it's not a Clover issue, then where is the issue? If you say CPU, then why, with the same CPU and motherboard, I get correct/appropriate readings in Windows (haven't tried Ubuntu yet) and (althogh I can't remember the exact version number) with that older version of Clover? Was it a bug then? Is it a bug now? This is what I'm trying to understand. And yes, as I said, changing the bus speed in config leads to some issues im.YouTube. If you only set the frequency (3200 in my case), the issue is gone and the displayed value is also 3.2 GHz. I'll try to run bdmesg on that real imac and see what kind of bus speeds do i get there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Hi arsradu, as well as other discussing the non-round cpu clock. There are settings in Clover config.plist <key>CPU</key> <dict> <key>#BusSpeedkHz</key> <integer>133330</integer> <key>#FrequencyMHz</key> <integer>3140</integer> BusSpeedkHz will set Bus Speed and tell to kernel FSBFrequency. if (DTLookupEntry(0, "/efi/platform", &entry) != kSuccess) { kprintf("EFI_FSB_frequency: didn't find /efi/platform\n"); return 0; } if (DTGetProperty(entry,FSB_Frequency_prop,&value,&size) != kSuccess) { kprintf("EFI_FSB_frequency: property %s not found\n", FSB_Frequency_prop); return 0; } Clover calculated value for me 99790. DO NOT ROUND IT!!! It is correct value. It is more correct value then 100000! It is checked and proved. Clover calculate the value with good precision, much more precise then you think. Changing the value will affect Clock, Sound and other system behavior. FrequencyMHz is a value to be written into DMI and affect only on AboutMac with System Profiler to show CPU Speed. It is safe to write here all you want. PS. CloverConfigurator tends to write something here. This is bad! Open the final config.plist with TextEditor and erase the lines with BusSpeedkHz to be not having this value. Or place # at the key as in my example. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts