Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I'm modding my patches for current kernel. Lots already done. I also noticed I can apply my code signature patch perfectly to the new kernel... So code signing... no problem EDIT: NOTE: The kernel has totally no i386 (32-bit) code inside as Mavericks never had a 32-bit kernel. So some patches that patched the 32-bit code are obsolete... Yes i see ! I same done . I need install Maverick 10.9 and test . Or you can test it is my kernel ))) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Yes i see ! I same done . I need install Maverick 10.9 and test . Or you can test it is my kernel ))) I have an Intel CPU... Did you also leave the needed support for booting Intel inside? Unfortunetely no AMD here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Great work guys. Can't wait to get testing As was said with the ML kernel. The year is not yet over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I have an Intel CPU... Did you also leave the needed support for booting Intel inside? Unfortunetely no AMD here... Yes ! I adding Intel's and AMD , i don't delete Intel ! If Your processor Intel(via) , i can add for VIA . ! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Bronya and Andy, if it's not asking too much, could you include Atom CPUs support to the mix? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Bronya and Andy, if it's not asking too much, could you include Atom CPUs support to the mix? My patch supports this. Unfortunetely cltools 5.0.1 only is not enough to build XNU. I also need Xcode 5.0.1 itself but I don't have enough bandwidth so I can only do the download in the weekend with a friend. The patch, however, is fully ported. EDIT: Oh yes, AMD TLB fix is no longer set unless boot argument is given It can be enabled with boot argument -amdtlbfix As most AMD cpus don't need this... @Bronya: You might want this, and if you could build it, would be cool EDIT: Oops, wrong diff... see somewhat further (a couple posts ahead)... Removed file... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 I'll build it! I'll do at once. Thank you very much! P.S.: Same errors both in patching - lots of .s files wouldn't be found - and building the actual kernel. In fact, it behaves just like when i tried with rc_4. P.P.S.: a screenshot of the errors while applying the patches: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Is Mavericks required to build the kernel? I only have Lion on my machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 @Bronya: You might want this, and if you could build it, would be cool Yes )) I need time ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Is Mavericks required to build the kernel? I only have Lion on my machine. I built it with Mavericks, but i really don't know. Will Xcode 5 run with Lion? If yes, i don't see why not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I'll build it! I'll do at once. Thank you very much! P.S.: Same errors both in patching - lots of .s files wouldn't be found - and building the actual kernel. In fact, it behaves just like when i tried with rc_4. P.P.S.: a screenshot of the errors while applying the patches: Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 3.59.48 PM.png Is 32-bit Intel patches... strange... Diff needs cleaning... Other than that, all ok if no patches fail (fuzz = ok) EDIT: Can't be right patch... I checked, see screenshot, you applied the wrong one... It has no acpi_wakeup.s in the source diff... Uploading again... Test the MavTest 1 diff... It should apply cleanly... EDIT2: Use test2 diff... below... I built it with Mavericks, but i really don't know. Will Xcode 5 run with Lion? If yes, i don't see why not... Xcode 5.0.1 will run on 10.8.X -> 10.9.X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 The patching went fine, but the build still fails. Some shots: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 The patching went fine, but the build still fails. Some shots: Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 4.29.11 PM.png Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 4.29.27 PM.png Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 4.29.46 PM.png Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 4.30.11 PM.png Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 4.30.33 PM.png Could you post me full log in text file format? I'll fix them... EDIT: I fixed the errors I saw in the screenshots. Try this one... EDIT2: Try test3 below... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charial Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 For those that want it. The ctf tools for building xnu (saves cctools + llvm + dtrace build) Ok after downloading what have i to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 log.txt Here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Ok after downloading what have i to do? Put the tools in /usr/bin. Make sure you have Xcode 5.0.1 and command line tools for Xcode installed. Apply patch. Build the kernel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Ok after downloading what have i to do? http://shantonu.blogspot.com.br/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 log.txt Here! Ok... I think all is fine with the test2 diff.. http://shantonu.blogspot.com.br/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=1 They don't mention building ctf_insert from cctools. Included in my ctf tools package... Check MakeInc.cmds... It is used there... So also install ctf_insert (you can get it from my uploaded ctf tools) ctf_insert --help Usage: ctf_insert input [-arch <arch> <file>]... -o output Which is used... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sannti Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 First for FX, if that will be working , then for the old cpu AMD. When will you start working with kernel for Phenom II ? Are you think i should buy new FX if i want get better working OS X ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charial Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Put the tools in /usr/bin. Make sure you have Xcode 5.0.1 and command line tools for Xcode installed. Apply patch. Build the kernel I've Mounatin Lion now. Have i to put the tools in ML? What patch? Sorry i'm learning about coding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 http://shantonu.blogspot.com.br/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=1 Interesting !!! I install command_line_tool_mountain_lion and xcode 5.0 . AND I compiled : 1) cxxfilt-11 <-- ok ! 2)dtrace-96 <-- ok ! 3) build xnu 10.9 <-- ok !!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 When will you start working with kernel for Phenom II ? Are you think i should buy new FX if i want get better working OS X ? The first question isn't polite to be asked to someone who's working at no charge for your benefit. The second i can answer myself: yes, FXs work better, but if you are to buy a new (and expensive) CPU, i suggest you spend a few more bucks and go straight with a future proof Gigabyte/Intel build. Andy, the build failed again: log2.txt 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 The first question isn't polite to be asked to someone who's working at no charge for your benefit. The second i can answer myself: yes, FXs work better, but if you are to buy a new (and expensive) CPU, i suggest you spend a few more bucks and go straight with a future proof Gigabyte/Intel build. True, but I prefer Asus + Intel (cheap i3-3320 IVY Bridge + Asus P8H77-M LE) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Rampagedev also prefer Asus, and called my preference for Gigabyte boards "kool-aid from the 'other site'", lol. Anyway, back on topic, did you see my second log? It's right above! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Interesting !!! I install command_line_tool_mountain_lion and xcode 5.0 . AND I compiled : 1) cxxfilt-11 <-- ok ! 2)dtrace-96 <-- ok ! 3) build xnu 10.9 <-- ok !!! No issues with ctf_insert missing? It's defined in MakeDefs.cmd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts