Andy Vandijck Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 You never know lol If I am correct here is the lanchd source, http://www.opensource.apple.com/tarballs/launchd/launchd-842.1.4.tar.gz www.opensource.apple.comHas them all now... Nice! EDIT: hmmm... plenty less entries than 10.8... For example: no IOUSBFamily, etc... Shame, Apple, shame! But we have dyld, launchd, xnu... Hmmm... they are giving less and less with each major release... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duran Keeley Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Welcome to the new Apple. Free upgrades to OS and early sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Welcome to the new Apple. Free upgrades to OS and early sources.Yeah... unfortunetely less sources than it used to be...10.8.5 has all like any 10.8 10.9 = a lot less sources. I don't like where this is going. They are locking down more sources with each major release... Not good... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duran Keeley Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Has Apple maybe changed the license recently? Since the os is being released as in a way "freeware" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Yeah... unfortunetely less sources than it used to be... 10.8.5 has all like any 10.8 10.9 = a lot less sources. I don't like where this is going. They are locking down more sources with each major release... Not good... Its possible an attempt to stop developers like yourself making kexts for unsupported hardware. Just a theory though or they just aren't uploaded yet. Making Mavericks USB just in the hope of some patched goodies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Has Apple maybe changed the license recently? Since the os is being released as in a way "freeware"Maybe... but lets hope they do give xnu + sources needed to build it in 10.10 / 11.0...That's what I'm worried about... They can deny posting ANY APSL licensed source because they own it :S Its possible an attempt to stop developers like yourself making kexts for unsupported hardware. Just a theory though or they just aren't uploaded yet. Making Mavericks USB just in the hope of some patched goodies Any / all are possible.Need to get the proper sources + xcode 5.0.1 + cltools... Probably can do in the weekend... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Stay tuned.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diazz72 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Can somone give me link for ML ( AMD FX ) kernel. Tnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diazz72 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/files/category/6-kernels/ TNX. . . ( need to be ready for 10.9 ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Downloaded the XNU sources late at night yesterday. As I was tired I just compiled as is to test if my Xcode was working fine and would be up to the task. All went right, then I tried compiling the kernel with Andy's AMD patches, which obviously returned a lot of errors, so I gave up and decided to test it all the day after: that means today. I'll report back if I come up with something useful. All the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diazz72 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Hmm. . .i am getting Still waiting for root device. . .after USBOhci. . .i am using FX-Kernle (on AMD FX-4100) whit Chameleon 2.1 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Hi ! I backup ! I from hard work , repair computer and affairs . What news ? )) i'm reading post ... ) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 (edited) hello Bronya look #3261 Hello !!! Ok! I need install on new partition Ml lion ! And i try compile xnu 10.9 ! Edited October 24, 2013 by Bronya 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcmuhl Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Hello, the link for download "amd_kernel.zip" is down. you can reupp it please? *sorry for my bad english Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 Well, applying good old SinetekBronzovkaAnVoodoo_rc4 to xnu-2422.1.72 is a no go: too many files changed names or doesn't exist at all (such as a bunch of .s files under osfmk/i386) resulting in too many compilation errors for me to compile in a reasonable time frame. It's necessary to start almost from scratch, and since I don't have time to engage full-time, I think i'm back from kernel coder wannabe status to guinea pig. Good luck, Andy, Sinetek and Bronzovka! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diazz72 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 That means there will be some time before we get kernel for amd ;( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Well, applying good old SinetekBronzovkaAnVoodoo_rc4 to xnu-2422.1.72 is a no go: too many files changed names or doesn't exist at all (such as a bunch of .s files under osfmk/i386) resulting in too many compilation errors for me to compile in a reasonable time frame. It's necessary to start almost from scratch, and since I don't have time to engage full-time, I think i'm back from kernel coder wannabe status to guinea pig. Good luck, Andy, Sinetek and Bronzovka! My experience is it still has most code the same inside but some things moved. Some things may need to be recoded... I installed the cltools for Xcode 5.0.1. I'm currently building tools like ctfmerge, ctfdump, ctfconvert (dtrace) and ctf_insert (cctools). Then I'm going to try applying the patch manually the needed files... I'll keep you posted... NOTE to other coders: some arm code may need to be excluded in order to build ctf_insert... (no problem, we don't build iPhone / iPad kernel...) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I tried compile xnu 10.9 with xcode 5.0 . Without problem .) I'm adding cpuid and others for amd only for FX )). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 It would be a great start if at least FX CPUs run Mavericks in that short a time from release. Good luck! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charial Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I'm adding cpuid and others for amd only for FX How did you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 For those that want it. The ctf tools for building xnu (saves cctools + llvm + dtrace build) ctf_tools_Mavericks.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sannti Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I tried compile xnu 10.9 with xcode 5.0 . Without problem .) I'm adding cpuid and others for amd only for FX )). No Phenom II support ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 No Phenom II support ? First for FX, if that will be working , then for the old cpu AMD. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Vandijck Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 First for FX, if that will be working , then for the old cpu AMD. I'm modding my patches for current kernel. Lots already done. I also noticed I can apply my code signature patch perfectly to the new kernel... So code signing... no problem EDIT: NOTE: The kernel has totally no i386 (32-bit) code inside as Mavericks never had a 32-bit kernel. So some patches that patched the 32-bit code are obsolete... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted October 24, 2013 Author Share Posted October 24, 2013 I'm modding my patches for current kernel. Lots already done. I also noticed I can apply my code signature patch perfectly to the new kernel... So code signing... no problem EDIT: NOTE: The kernel has totally no i386 (32-bit) code inside as Mavericks never had a 32-bit kernel. So some patches that patched the 32-bit code are obsolete... Yes, i noticed that. In fact, it was strange that Mountain Lion's still had them (understandable on the 32-bit dp1, but it never came to the final version). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts