Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 not really surprised that it's rebooting.. could someone test on FX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ PhoeniX Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I can write installer on USB and try to boot with your kernel. Which kernel file and parameters I need? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 10.9 DP7 sinetek kernel http://speedy.sh/fGpKk/mv song to go with it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z6ZJQEGVGY Hi Sinetek, wonderful to know that you've released the first AMD-test-kernel for maverick, I will tonight when I'm at home, test it with my prepared external HDD and will report my results. This is very good news, no matter what first test results are obtained, which the main thing that lives on the development. 10.9 DP7 sinetek kernel.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkimoA Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 instant reboot on Phenom as well any flags to go with it `? i figured not since its a binpatch i guess way to go Tx for your affords keep it up have a good day 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Many thanks to all my testers, love you guys Might be the MSR's that's tripping up AMD boards. Let's cross fingers. Anyone would like to help me out with my web illiteracy find some hosting spot? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaneee Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Anyone would like to help me out with my web illiteracy find some hosting spot? If you mean to host the kernel you could use dropbox or mediafire. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 there are so many possible issues. let's try some fixes. http://cl.ly/20320Z0G1910 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Sinetek do not worry about of the many kernel-testers, we are hotter than New Year's 2012/13 than it came to Mountain Lion AMD kernel the first test was without success, I will now test your second kernel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted September 12, 2013 Author Share Posted September 12, 2013 Just tested. Instant reboot, unfortunately. Keep'em coming! All the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spakk Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 (edited) there are so many possible issues. let's try some fixes. http://cl.ly/20320Z0G1910 second test: only with boot flag:-nossse3 gray screen (in the background load the kexts) shortly thereafter for a fraction of a second to see the gray apple, then restart I have tried almost everything, unfortunately no success, no kernel panic message. the system re-starts only. Edited September 12, 2013 by spakk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcobco Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 what about hosting this darwin kernel non-intel port builds and sources in sites like googlecode, github, ... ? we would have proper bug tracking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe75 Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Apple already host sources Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 omg , interesting . i here . i only that test it is kernel and fix 1) i checked and answer : no problem . i can fix it is ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 you know the drill http://cl.ly/2D033i0Z1E2C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkimoA Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 same same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 @bronya and now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 you know the drill http://cl.ly/2D033i0Z1E2C It is divide error ! I know it is problem . it is number cpu in cpuid . I can fix ..... i need time ... But i fix "no linesize" and normal . please wait . i need check "single user" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 then we're getting a bit closer. that means it's skipping over the Intel CPU cache code. It's weird though, the AMD folks should be able to see the divide by 0 panic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 then we're getting a bit closer. that means it's skipping over the Intel CPU cache code. It's weird though, the AMD folks should be able to see the divide by 0 panic it amd no know pseudo code "cpuid" from "intel" . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 @bronya да)) no sources.. so difficult. it bombs in cpu_thread_alloc. maybe AMD crashes sooner??? MSR's....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 @bronya да)) no sources.. so difficult. it bombs in cpu_thread_alloc. maybe AMD crashes sooner??? MSR's....... NO . it is cpuid. it is cpu number in cupid_set_info . you see : for intel : cpuid_fn(0, cpuid_result); info_p->cpuid_cores_per_package = bitfield32(reg[eax], 31, 26) + 1; for amd : cpuid_fn(0x80000008, cpuid_result); info_p->cpuid_cores_per_package = (ecx & 0xff) + 1; I checked - don't working single user . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 @bronya weird, it's the first i hear of that. CPUID function 0 is valid on AMD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 (edited) @bronya weird, it's the first i hear of that. CPUID function 0 is valid on AMD amd don't support "cupid function" 0 for "cpu number" )))) support only 0x80000008 ) sinetek, you can speak to me how used qemu with "terminal gdb" ? i try if have time ... Edited September 12, 2013 by Bronya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinetek Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 ugh. it's a hard problem. CPU topology depends on checking number of cores. div by 0 error everywhere. need to fill in a structure, but how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronya Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 ugh. it's a hard problem. CPU topology depends on checking number of cores. div by 0 error everywhere. need to fill in a structure, but how? yes . replace hex code in cupid_set_info and add cpuid in tsc_init ))) . i it is trying ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts