maximus Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 How looks the luxball picture (the ball plus the background) ? If high % invalide pixel you should see some diff compared to normal luxball scene picture. Yeah the scene is darker than normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 on my X99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 Made this one to compare i7-5820k (post above) vs i7-6700k, same GPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 5820K Winner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 Barely, negligible even... I'd say it's even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 yes , is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 GTX 960 better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 I've done some more benchmarks and it seems the 6700k performs as well or within 5% of the 5820k... and this CPUs' code isn't even optimized yet in osx. But it's fun to see how good 4 vs 6 cores are... especially now the CPU's are equally prized due to skyline shortages. Pretty much only cinebench shows some good difference beyond 5%.... not miles but still. Since the motherboards tend to be cheaper I wanted to see what would be the better buy and if I've done right going with skylake. Just happened to see the post with the exact same gpu so shared the results. Also each time I do the benchmark the results are slightly different and if I do it enough times I'd be able to post the higher results. It will be fun to see how much performance the 6700k gets from the next 10.11.3 update + nv drivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 It appears that the 6700K to 5820K equivalent performance and in addition it normally consumes less.Priori good pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 6700kk vs 5820 kk vs 3930kk LuxMark !!! start...........!!! post my CPU frequency stock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 The frequency is in stock but I upgraded my block to 125Mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 10.11.4 and CPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew82 Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 2X 290x and 5820k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 2X 290x and 5820k Zrzut ekranu 2016-04-12 o 17.22.12.png nice 10.11.4 and CPU extra 7950 all stock cpu-cpu on my X99 , well optimized 10.11.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Hi, Ultimate X99, 2 video cardsHD 7950 for OpenCL 32 seconds Bryce X benchmark for FCPXA GTX 960 for Open GL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okrasit Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Made this one to compare i7-5820k (post above) vs i7-6700k, same GPU Just a post to show how much difference new drivers make, benched on Sierra with the same setup; Quite impressive, first support vs latest (mature) support =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Just a post to show how much difference new drivers make, benched on Sierra with the same setup; Quite impressive, first support vs latest (mature) support =) Very good new Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@ROBASEFR Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 GTX 970 Gainward Phantom : All with latest Webdrivers My test results with : 10.11.5 - Luxmark 3.1 (OpenCL 1.2):GPU 9675;CPU/GPU:11557 10.11.6 - Luxmark 3.1 (OpenCL 1.2):GPU 10983;CPU/GPU:12533 Sierra PB2 - Luxmark 3.1 (OpenCL 1.2):GPU 11300; CPU/GPU:13042 Comment on clockspeeds: with 10.11.6 the card clocks at 1304 mhz (Normal Specs1304 MHz (boost) / 1152 MHz (base)) with 10.12 PB2 the card clocks at 1080 mHz ! (definitely beta drivers .... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 It really is a very good newsFinally a true optimization of Web Drivers for OpenCL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeBeRiO Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Is it correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted August 2, 2016 Author Share Posted August 2, 2016 I think no, Image validation should be in green text (< 5% failed). Result(12430) isnt usable to compare I think the luxball pic also looks not normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fljagd Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Check if you have the latest version of Web Drivers On Sierra, webdrivers are good look here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeBeRiO Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 I'm in 10.11.6 with last webdrivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts