mitch_de Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 LuxMark has gained, during the past year, a good level of acceptance as OpenCL benchmark. It has been used by AnandTech, Tom's Hardware, Vr-zone and other sites as standard GPU computing benchmark. AMD has used LuxMark as one of the 5 GPU computing benchmarks to present the new HD7970. Info: http://www.luxmark.info/ New link! Wiki: https://wiki.luxcorerender.org/LuxMark DL V4.0 (NEW, added alpha1 version of November 2020) https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxMark/releases/tag/luxmark_v4.0alpha1 DL V4.0 (NEW, added alpha0 version of October 2019) https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxMark/releases/tag/luxmark_v4.0alpha0 DL V3.1 (NEW, added final version of September 2015) https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxMark/tree/luxmark_v3.1 New link! DL V3.0 (NEW, added end of Feb 2015) - due to OpenCL driver (compiler fails) probs (OS X, Linux) on most gpus only the small scene luxball can benched. The two bigger, complexer scenes fail. https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxMark/tree/luxmark_v3.0 New link! Luxmark 3.0 Results Database http://www.luxmark.info Luxmark 2.0 Results Database - you can look / search for already submitted results (by the app, not posted here) DL V2.0 https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxCore/tree/luxmark_v2.0 New link! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 scene: sala ATI Radeon 4830, OS X 10.7.2 = 151 Edit: I couldn't send the results, it said login failed, but I registered an account (I can login on the page itself, but not in the app). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 scenes/sala/render.cfg ATI Radeon Barts XT Prototype [GPU, 14, 900 MHz] Result: 484 HIS 6870 + 10.7.2 (11C74) + OpenGL 2.1 ATI-7.18.10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goron Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 Geforce 9800GT 512 MB -> 88 Geforce 9800GT 512MB + i5 2500K on 10.7.2 -> 325 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 12, 2012 Author Share Posted January 12, 2012 Added new render.cfg. No speed changes but not overbright result anymore. File attatched (+ screenshoot were to put) in first posting. For me submitting result worked. Perhaps some problem like special characters? in name / pwd ? I would use an simple one if it fails. Never use your main pwds (email & Co) for such cases. So doenst matter if you let it simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 That Prototype??? is my HIS 6870 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npwski Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I could not send results some time ago ("login failed"). But now results submission is working properly. Nvidia GTX 580 ("MSI Ligtning" oced @915Mhz) = 1230 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 GREAT ! First place with Single GPU for npwski http://www.luxrender...op20/Sala/GPU/1 GRATULATIONS PS: Woudl be nice if you add the CPU + GPU result. i7 860 + 3x ATI 5870 around 2700 in the results cpu+gpu db, maybe you bet them or came close with only one GTX 580 + same cpu ? background: The more gpus the faster has an limit - the cpu is the bottleneck in that case. So 4 5870 are only very little faster than 3 5870 with same cpu. cpu + systembus + PCIe Bus is overloaded by huge datatransfers. GPUs must wait to get their results back to cpu. To fire lots of such highend gpus fast enough you would need an cpu + systembusspeed + PCIe speed which isnt developed already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Tested again with the new config.cfg file: ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB: 151 (same result with the older cfg file) ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB + Intel Core2Duo E6750 oc'd 3,2Ghz: 246 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npwski Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Woudl be nice if you add the CPU + GPU result. i7 860 + 3x ATI 5870 around 2700 in the results cpu+gpu db, maybe you bet them or came close with only one GTX 580 + same cpu ? Thank you, Mitch And no, i can't beat "i7-860 + 3x Cypress", because my quad-core CPU not so fast as 3x top-level GPU. Anyway, it's CPU+GPU score: i7-860 @4100Mhz + single GTX 580 @915Mhz = 1341 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaball Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 ATi Radeon 4850 = 224 (GV-R485OC-1GH gpu@733/mem@1066MHz; Core i7 920@3,33GHz; 10.7.2) Core i7 920@3,33GHz = 414 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 i am the 77 looser - anyone try to rescue me from that postion ?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 219 = GPU only or CPUs + GPU. Other 9800 GT got 88 gpu only. If gpu+cpus please post gpu only result too. Incredible: 4 * AMD 7970 GPU only got 6153 (win, http://www.luxrender...etail/result/87 ) I must buy 90 of 9600 GT to get close to that ? Also you can see that in such case, many highend gpus must be fired fast with data from cpu, it happens that gpus+cpus is much SLOWER than gpu only. Thats because the cpu is on the limit communicating with the gpus already and if the cpu has do do own work beside that the overall speed getting very worse compared to gpu only. This chart (from that 4* AMD 7970 hero) shows that drasticly: Also the very small improvement from the OS X hero GTX 580 vs GTX 580 + i7 , 1200 vs 1300 shows that already. cpu is on the limit - already with one fast gpu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfcaster Posted January 15, 2012 Share Posted January 15, 2012 Sapphire 6850 = 351 Sapphire 6850+i5 2400 = 670 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted January 15, 2012 Share Posted January 15, 2012 Q9450 @ 3.33 ghz + 5770 = 529 Q9450 @ 3.33 ghz = 224 5770 = 315 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 15, 2012 Author Share Posted January 15, 2012 Hi friends, soon there will be an new beta which has added an third scene - complex with more than 2 Mio triangles to compute. Its unclear if gpus 512 MB VRAM it should be no problem. EDIT: V2.0Beta2 (with new scene room ) now available at same DL link first posting. i added new results section room in the first post. I got 23 with gpu only GT 9600 512 MB. The results DB website also updated. complex = room scene. NEW: The results DB now has an search function , where you can search with OS type, scene type,.... so you will see your and similar results even you are not listed in the TOP 20. http://www.luxrender...k/search/search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 15, 2012 Share Posted January 15, 2012 Did it again with GPU + CPU 2600K 3,4 GHz + HIS 6870 -> Result 884 points Exactly 400 more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 16, 2012 Author Share Posted January 16, 2012 Dont forget to DL new Beta2 (same DL Link as Beta1, 1. posting) and test new very complex scene room (> 2 million triangles, huge VRAM consumption) 512 MB VRAM is little to less VRAM for good speed, so it will be much speed diff between same gpu with 512 or more MB (640,....). 640 MB VRAM s already enough for that room scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farx Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 v2 Beta2 new scene room, GTX275 896MB GPU only = 121 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mm67 Posted January 16, 2012 Share Posted January 16, 2012 Beta2, Room scene, HD6870 & i7-2600K, Gpu only=255, Gpu + Cpu = 589 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted January 17, 2012 Share Posted January 17, 2012 Beta 2.0 beta2 Scene Room: ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB: 92 ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB + Intel C2D E6750 3,2Ghz: 147 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 20, 2012 Author Share Posted January 20, 2012 Yesterday an new BETA2 was updated! NEW DL Link in first posting. Some LION optimisations, some fixes for room scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Beta2: 6870 + i7 2600K (stock): Sala: ATI Radeon HIS 6870 OS X 10.7.2 = 484 + 2600K 3,4 GHz = 884 Room: ATI Radeon HIS 6870 OS X 10.7.2 = 224 + 2600K 3,4 GHz = 470 Luxball: ATI Radeon HIS 6870 OS X 10.7.2 = 4556 + 2600K 3,4 GHz = 7398 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 20, 2012 Author Share Posted January 20, 2012 Hi, are that the new Beta2 results ? The Beta2 was updated yesterday (DL Link also updated) . I ask because room has excact same 484 gpu only than your older posted room result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badeendje Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 It's the average of 5 benches, and yes I happen to get exactly the same results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts