blacksheep Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Mavs with disabled v-sync Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoisonApple666 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 You just drag a window over the benchmark when its going and it speeds up from 60fps to the right fps. And the other is an app you can click disable beam sync and it sorts the score out without a window. And thats all the 2 things do is make the fps right in ocean wave nothing else. I thought it would make mavericks run smoother but it does not lol the window thing works .... went from 60 up 570 fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksheep Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 Got another 7950, this one without boost. Managed to push it to 1300 MHz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koliberK Posted March 18, 2014 Share Posted March 18, 2014 Hi, Have here GTX 570 with AquagraFX - 850MHz / 1700MHz / 2000MHz QDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertX Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 ...hi, just for the record... same result, AA on or AA off ...the Pentium D is the bottleneck... but still... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fangio Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 13E9, Gigabyte R9 280X w/ EFI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Sapphire HD 6670 1024 LP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksheep Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Sapphire HD 6670 1024 LP V-sync not disabled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 V-sync not disabled? uh, how can I see it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacksheep Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 uh, how can I see it? Use Quartz Debug for this purpose. R9 280 @1150/6000, 10.9.4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svetolik Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Does someone can help me to configure MSI Twin frozer and Saphire Dual X 7950? I am having correct test results with GL Wiev about 4100 points but Ocean open CL is 85 points with reduced bandwidth. Luxmark was about 2000 points but now it keeps crashing. wWth booth cards it is worse and T am having random reboots. Thanks in advance. Asus p6t6 Mavericks 10.9.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Sapphire HD 6850 / kabini 25 w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 HD 7850 / 1024 / no dsdt / no flag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 HD 6670 LP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 HD 7850 1024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 @ gils83 you should have better results with your config + vsync=disabled here's what I have with my old P5KPL-AM / E8400 / GTX 570 config 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 hello fantomas,I already disabled V-Sync, the HD 7850 is an average card, the results of 570 compares with HD 69xx / 79xx, the results for the HD 7850 are consistent, it is a lowcoast model 860 Mhz / 1024 I should get to 480 FPS in Mavericks. the R9 270X (equivalent HD 7870) has a score of 550 fps 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 well... I believe you but it still is a bit strange, since both cards have pretty similar performance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 but 320 bit vs 256 bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 GT 440 1024 / HD 6670 / 10.10.3 14D130a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted April 7, 2015 Author Share Posted April 7, 2015 Found interesting OpenCL (vs. CPU) Benchmark CompuBench CL - to have other OpenCL Benchtools beside this and Luxmark (2.0, 3.0 has major bugs in OS X). http://compubench.com/result.jsp Test select, default is CPU, check OpenCL (GPU) to measure GPU OpenCL MY GT 440 (Nvidia) Results 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riley Freeman Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Found interesting OpenCL (vs. CPU) Benchmark CompuBench CL - to have other OpenCL Benchtools beside this and Luxmark (2.0, 3.0 has major bugs in OS X). http://compubench.com/result.jsp Test select, default is CPU, check OpenCL (GPU) to measure GPU OpenCL Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-07 um 13.09.16.jpg MY GT 440 (Nvidia) Results Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-07 um 13.08.46.jpg hello , I do not think that this test reflects something serious, at least for AMD graphics card almost falling asleep (46 ° C max), it is optimized for Nvidia certainly and I had a fail test T-Rex and Bitcoin result is bad. Luxmark the test shows the true potential of OpenCL graphics cards. When I see the final results of the different graphics cards, I still doubt, knowing that Titan X is less than in most of the areas facing an AMD 295 X thanks test in vidéo and music ! https://youtu.be/MQjRGSRowh0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts