Regi Yassin Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 i have no idea this result is normal or it has an error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 7, 2013 Author Share Posted January 7, 2013 looks OK! Error only, if result pic shows no waves or no sun or wont run at all. As all benches: Your fps result (compared to others) may get different ranking compared to ranking in galaxies or luxmark results. OpenCL Code + usage of OpenGL (parallel) + usage of CPU give that wide range of different rankings of different OpenCL benches using different gpus+cpus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eep357 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 (edited) OK, not exactly sure what I did here..Although I still have some cosmetic overclock settings entered in Clover's config.plist, I put all the BIOS overclock settings to bare stock except XMP for RAM...And just ran the best series of benchmarks I've ever done, both GPU ones and CPU ones. I'll post a few others in their threads. Wow! I've never seen it say PS=xxxx before, but have never seen that big of a number either. Edited January 24, 2013 by eep357 invalid benchmark, inflated by Clover config error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 20, 2013 Author Share Posted January 20, 2013 LOL - too much fps I will fix that cosmetic bug (ps = vs fps =) soon for FPS > 999.9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 21, 2013 Author Share Posted January 21, 2013 updated to 1.3, minor gui changes, updated reported result list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shatterhenner Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 hi mitch, how to switch the gpu!? i got two nvidias installed?! thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k3nny Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 XFX Radeon HD 7870 DD: Although I usually get about 340 fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 21, 2013 Author Share Posted January 21, 2013 hi mitch, how to switch the gpu!? i got two nvidias installed?! thx Sorry, gpu selection isn´t implemented yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvxtm Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 It does not work anymore for me, the system is in the sig. The app opens, i click benchmark and then the submission form shows up, no benchmark, no sun ,no sea and no score. only the submission window. Any clue as to why this happens ? PS: i get this in log : OpenCL OceanWave:bash: line 1: 310 Segmentation fault: 11 ./OpenCL_OceanWave OpenCL OceanWave:bash: line 1: 313 Segmentation fault: 11 ./OpenCL_OceanWave OpenCL OceanWave:bash: line 1: 319 Segmentation fault: 11 ./OpenCL_OceanWave OpenCL OceanWave:bash: line 1: 324 Segmentation fault: 11 ./OpenCL_OceanWave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iFIRE Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 i7 860 2.80GHZ ML 10.8.2 HD XFX 5770 = 144 FPS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 29, 2013 Author Share Posted January 29, 2013 It does not work anymore for me, the system is in the sig. The app opens, i click benchmark and then the submission form shows up, no benchmark, no sun ,no sea and no score. only the submission window. Any clue as to why this happens ? PS: i get this in log : seg fault 11 Never seen this before. First try to download again (and unzip). OpenCL_Oceanwave (the code called in the bash) is in 64 Bit only - maybe your system doenst run 64 Bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvxtm Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 Never seen this before. First try to download again (and unzip). OpenCL_Oceanwave (the code called in the bash) is in 64 Bit only - maybe your system doenst run 64 Bit? "64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes" i'm on OS X 10.7.4 , could it be that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 Acer 8930G core2duo / GT 9600m 512 Caractéristiques de l'objet Point d'origine: Guangdong China (Mainland) Description Carte vidéo GeForce 9600M GS 512MB, DDR3 graphiques II originaux des tous neufs de Nvidia MXM Dispositifs : Fabricant NVIDIA Série GeForce 9M Nom de code NB9P Canalisations 32 - unifié Vitesse de noyau * 430 mégahertz Vitesse de Shader * 1075 mégahertz Vitesse de mémoire * 800 mégahertz Largeur d'autobus de mémoire Bit 128 Type de mémoire GDDR2 Quantité maximale de mémoire Mb 256 Mémoire partagée non DirectX DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Transistors 314 millions technologie 65 nanomètre Dispositifs PCI-E 2.0, 400 mégahertz de Speichertakt d'und du bei GDDR2 bei GDDR3 de 800 mégahertz Taille de cahier moyen Date d'annonce 03.06.2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted January 30, 2013 Author Share Posted January 30, 2013 i'm on OS X 10.7.4 , could it be that ? Normally not, even i build it with 10.8 SDK. Try OpenCL_Oceanwave ( the OpenCL code part, put unzipped into OpenCL_Oceanwave/Content/Resources) which was build using SDK 10.7 For me, 10.8.3 doenst matter in speed / working same using the 10.7 SDK build. OpenCL_OceanWave.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gils83 Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 AMD Phenom x6 / HD 4850 1024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Surprised to see my 6870 outscore a 7870 on page 11 of this thread o.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted February 2, 2013 Author Share Posted February 2, 2013 Yep, but small FPS diffs can happen between different CPu /Bus / PCIe speeds and different clocked (GPU/VRAM) speeds to. Even on same system speed diffs between two runs can happen - in area of 400 FPS at least 10-20 fps diff between runs is normal. Perhaps the OpenCLbandwidth test may help to find out such speed diffs (CPUGPU data transferspeed, GPUGPU(=devicetodevice) speeds) Here are my results for 9600 GT: Last value, device to device shows VRAM acess speed, limited by VRAM type + VRAM clock and VRAM bandwidth (how many Bits, like 64 bit for low end gpus like GT210/GT220, 128 bits, 192 bits or 256 Bits) The first two values are CPUPCIGPU transferspeeds and limited by PCIe speed, CPU type and GPU type+clock Developer/GPU Computing/OpenCL/bin/darwin/release/oclBandwidthTest Starting... Running on... GeForce 9600 GT Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 2200.0 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 1784.8 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 27501.7 [oclBandwidthTest] test results... PASSED > exiting in 3 seconds: 3...2...1...done! logout oclBandwidthTest.zip 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Very much true that there will always be slight differences when having same gpu with different cpu/bus/pci speeds etc but looking at his system with an i5 paired with the 7870, I'd only assume that my cpu overclock has to do with the higher fps from the gpu (just an assumption I'll test with stock clock settings to verify). And thank you mitch_de the test proves quite interesting to see those differences in bandwidth. The last one involving the vram speed was the most interesting for me to see as I've never seen the actual speeds in any tests before. I might pick at the other guy to run the test as well so I could see how the numbers look on his end. Running on... ATI Radeon Barts XT Prototype Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 4531.3 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 5770.6 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 102000.4 [oclBandwidthTest] test results... PASSED > exiting in 3 seconds: 3...2...1...done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k3nny Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Mh, here are my results: /Users/alex/Downloads/oclBandwidthTest Starting... Running on... AMD Radeon HD Pitcairn XT Prototype Compute Engine Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 9859.1 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 11576.8 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 84047.9 [oclBandwidthTest] test results... PASSED > exiting in 3 seconds: 3...2...1...done! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Talk about quick to post, thank you k3nny As I somehow assumed, it's definitely only the gpu not so much the OC because your first 2 test scores no doubt beat mine since the cpu is in the party. Both our cards share the same 256 bit interface so the difference lies within the cards independent of the other system components. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 Yep, interesting is the big speed diff for transferspeed CPU>PCIe bus> GPU (VRAM) and GPU (VRAM) > PCIe bus> CPU. Twice as fast for the one system compared to other. 4500 vs 9800 MB/sand 5700 vs 11500 MB/s ! GPU VRAM >GPU VRAM transferspeed diff isnt that much 84000 vs 102000. Because OpenCL Apps must always (more or less) submit data (for computing) to gpu and receive result data that transferspeed (CPUPCieGPU) can make the difference even gpu+VRAM speed has less differences. Thats why real (science) gpu computing tries to minimise transfered data or like PCie 3.0 (+ MB Chipset support + GPU chipset support) bus systems. (Old AGP or PCI bus would be a no go for today gpu computing : only 1/4 - 1/10 of your transferspeeds over PCie) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oSxFr33k Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 DOes anyone know what the Hex edits are for OSX 10.8.2 in: /System/Library/Extensions/ GeForceGLDriver.bundle/Contents/MacOS/GeForceGLDriver and /System/Library/Extensions/ GeForceGLDriver.bundle/Contents/MacOS/libclh.dylib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Vermelho Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 *First Kepler score* 892.2 FPS Brand new Mountain Lion 10.8.2 install Nvidia 304.00.05f02 driver, CUDA 5.0.37 OpenCL unpatched No AGPM edits GraphicsEnabler=n - no injection! MacPro3,1 system definition EVGA Geforce GTX 660 2GB (vanilla model) Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz Asus P5Q-E (P45 Express/ICH10R) 4GB RAM Running on... GeForce GTX 660 Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 4227.2 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s), Paged memory, direct access Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 5542.3 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 81757.6 [oclBandwidthTest] test results... PASSED 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I can't believe dis! You now own the stripper pole GV 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts