samsonluk Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 im looking in to it everthing is slow going atm as im working 14 hours a day Hey relax and take your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psygnosis Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Someone tested this driver on Mobility Radeon HD 3450 device-id 0x95c4? My specs are in the forum sign Thanks a lot in advance Anyway thanks for your hard work it's appreciated and awsome either if my graphic card will be supported or not...It's a great evolution for the community Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Espionage724 Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So wait, could this possibly bring QE/CI to the Radeon HD 3200 (support for it before didn't exist due to lack of drivers)? Edit: If theres hope, then I'll get me a copy of OS X to try it out Edit2: Btw, here's my hardware details: Radeon HD 3200 Mobility (I can install Desktop drivers with no isues, but this is in a laptop, so I assume Mobility) Compatible Id: PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9610 Hardware Id: PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9612&SUBSYS_308C103C 256MB Dedicated, Up to 1405-1406MB total from HyperMemory on Win7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 So wait, could this possibly bring QE/CI to the Radeon HD 3200 (support for it before didn't exist due to lack of drivers)? Edit: If theres hope, then I'll get me a copy of OS X to try it out Edit2: Btw, here's my hardware details: Radeon HD 3200 Mobility (I can install Desktop drivers with no isues, but this is in a laptop, so I assume Mobility) Compatible Id: PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9610 Hardware Id: PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9612&SUBSYS_308C103C 256MB Dedicated, Up to 1405-1406MB total from HyperMemory on Win7 Im still working on mobility support im learning framebuffers in my spare time i work 14 hours a day so time is sparis it seems as of late weekend is here so maby ill get some work done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Espionage724 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Im still working on mobility support im learning framebuffers in my spare time i work 14 hours a day so time is sparis it seems as of late weekend is here so maby ill get some work done Alright cool, glad to see you actually trying to make this possible Always wanted to run OS X on my new laptop (with gaming in mind). But out of curiosity, whats the difference between the desktop and mobility hardware? Other then the display options that is anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psygnosis Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 @Linearburn So Mobility HD 3450 is not supported yet? Do you need something like bios or some information for your work? if yes let me know...I would like to help you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted May 15, 2011 Author Share Posted May 15, 2011 The main differnace is the lvds, on the frambuffer usualy they have between 2-4 outputs and commonly what seems to be happining is the ports are not maped correctly .... the external ports work good internal lvds not working. what i hope to do is make the lvds always port 0 and then move down the list for mobile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spac3man Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Hi guys! First of all, thanks for everybody who works on adding support of ATI cards. I met some issues after installing iAtkos 10.6.6 v2, so let me explain the situation. I installed that distro on my Dell Inspiron 1545 with Mobility Radeon HD 4330 (256 MB RAM). I chose Chameleon v2 RC5 from iAtkos disk. And then I saw screen with wrong resolution (I didn't do a screenshot, but I think it's not necessary). After trying to use Dong's method, I realised that it's too hard and complicated (English is not my native language), so I tried your kexts. I've installed everything from Beta 3, set all permissions, and cleared cache. So, everything is unmodified except your kexts from Beta 3. And this is what I have now: 1) system loads with GraphicsEnabler=No and with native resolution 1366x768x32, BUT with no QE/CL. What is loaded: ATI4600Controller, ATISupport, ATIRadeonX2000, ATIRadeonX3000, RadeonHD. ATIFramebuffer is not loaded (I tried to load it "by hands" with kextload, it seems to be loaded then, but nothing changes). As you can see on the picture in attachment, the system recognizes my graphic card correctly (sorry, the screenshot is in Russian locale, but I think everything is clear). AtiConfig boot parameter is unnecessary, I think - I tried it with RadeonFramebuffer value, and undefined - in both cases the system starts and work perfect except QE/CL and strange cursor (block of colored lines, you can see it on screenshot). 2) the second case: I write GraphicsEnabler=Yes, then system starts (verbose output doesn't show any graphic problems). After it starts, cursor looks normal (except "plain" shadow), but the other graphic looks like blocks (see another screenshot in attachment). But even in this case I can switch off the system, so everything except graphic card works. Sorry if I didn't provide the full required information, just tell me what to do and I'll post it. I really appreciate any help. Thanks for everybody who will help me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psygnosis Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 The main differnace is the lvds, on the frambuffer usualy they have between 2-4 outputs and commonly what seems to be happining is the ports are not maped correctly .... the external ports work good internal lvds not working. what i hope to do is make the lvds always port 0 and then move down the list for mobile So you don't need our graphic bios for mobile card? What do you mean with "move down the list for mobile"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordadmiral Drake Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 @spac3man: RadeonHD.kext should not be used together with ATIFramebuffer.kext + ATIxxxxController.kext Also only one ATIRadeonXxxxx.kext should be loaded at any time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martuzki Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Maybe this can help you (ATI 4570 Mobility "EliteGroup": Peregrine: VGA 02 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 09 01 00 00 02 01 01 02 LVDS 10 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 10 00 01 Both will work and i can change the res to 1366x768/1980x1080. On the VGA Output the screen is not centred. NO QE/CI!!! BIOS Dump: ATOM BIOS Rom: SubsystemVendorID: 0x1019 SubsystemID: 0x2379 IOBaseAddress: 0x9000 Filename: BR033553.004 BIOS Bootup Message: BR033553.004 M92 DDR2 64bit 500e/500m PCI ID: 1002:9553 Connector at index 0 Type [@offset 45504]: VGA (1) Encoder [@offset 45508]: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_DAC1 (0x15) i2cid [@offset 45548]: 0x90, OSX senseid: 0x1 Connector at index 1 Type [@offset 45514]: LVDS (7) Encoder [@offset 45518]: INTERNAL_UNIPHY2 (0x21) i2cid [@offset 45571]: 0x91, OSX senseid: 0x2 Can someone tell me how i can enable QE/CI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Espionage724 Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 The main differnace is the lvds, on the frambuffer usualy they have between 2-4 outputs and commonly what seems to be happining is the ports are not maped correctly .... the external ports work good internal lvds not working. what i hope to do is make the lvds always port 0 and then move down the list for mobile Hmm, well with my laptop, I have an external monitor hooked to it 95% of the time. Is there a chance that these kexts might still work then? I don't really mind LVDS not working, but helping making it work would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martuzki Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Under 10.6.7 ive luck Peregrine: LVDS 02 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 09 01 00 00 02 01 01 02 VGA 10 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 10 00 01 Result: QE/CI, VGA+LVDS works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spac3man Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 @spac3man: RadeonHD.kext should not be used together with ATIFramebuffer.kext + ATIxxxxController.kext Also only one ATIRadeonXxxxx.kext should be loaded at any time OK, I removed RadeonHD.kext and ATIRadeonX3000.kext. Now if I use GraphicsEnabler=No flag, the system loads, but doesn't even recognize my graphic card. Resolution resets to default 1024x768. As I determined, it happens because RadeonHD.kext doesn't load. If I use GraphicsEnabler=Yes, the same screen with colored blocks appears. ATIFramebuffer.kext doesn't load on boot, but here's output of kextutil: /System/Library/Extensions/ATIFramebuffer.kext appears to be loadable (not including linkage for on-disk libraries). Loading /System/Library/Extensions/ATIFramebuffer.kext. /System/Library/Extensions/ATIFramebuffer.kext successfully loaded (or already loaded). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted May 16, 2011 Author Share Posted May 16, 2011 I use the bioses to look at the outputs and get dumpsfrom them i use them but atm im working on 1-2 that i got and hope get up to speed on them the problem with distros is thay are hevely modded so there is no telling what is breaking the install Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMD_FRAGGER Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 I got a Mobility HD3470 (devID: 95C4). After adding all the kexts it gets displayed as 'unknown' in SystemProfiler and only ATISupport.kext & ATIRadeonX3000.kext get loaded. (That's with GraphicsEnabler activated.) If you need additional information let me know! Thanks for trying to make this work, really appreciate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordadmiral Drake Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 X3000 shouldnt load. ATIRadeonX2000.kext is responsible for HD2xxx to HD4xxx cards. Move your cards ID over to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMD_FRAGGER Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 X3000 shouldnt load. ATIRadeonX2000.kext is responsible for HD2xxx to HD4xxx cards. Move your cards ID over to it After adding the device id to the right kext (and removing it from the other) the result is similar: ATIRadeonX2000.kext as well as ATISupport.kext get loaded but not one of the *Controller.kext's nor the framebuffer kext. Thanks for your help! EDIT: Also found this in dmesg output: ATY,Megalodon: Not usable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malak Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Hi, did someone tested those kext on Vaio E, 5650 + Full HD LVDS ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Espionage724 Posted May 17, 2011 Share Posted May 17, 2011 Hmm, well with my laptop, I have an external monitor hooked to it 95% of the time. Is there a chance that these kexts might still work then? I don't really mind LVDS not working, but helping making it work would be nice. Just re-asking, I finally got a hold of OS X Snow Leopard again, would love to try it out if theres hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alycannn Posted May 17, 2011 Share Posted May 17, 2011 I need ApplicationServices.framework from 10.6.7/System/Library/Frameworks its very important I have this problem can you help me ? http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=257243 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leopard1993 Posted May 17, 2011 Share Posted May 17, 2011 hello i has a mobility 4650 0x94801002 in an hp pavilion dv6-1215sl(notebook), i've attached my bios dump .rom extracted with everest on windows 1002_9480.rar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nassef Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 here is my result laptop dell inspirion n7010 intel i5 ATI Mobility Radeon 5470 1G ATI Radeon HD 5000: Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 5000 Type: GPU Bus: PCIe Slot: Slot-1 PCIe Lane Width: x16 VRAM (Total): 1024 MB Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x68e0 Revision ID: 0x0000 ROM Revision: 113-B7710C-176 EFI Driver Version: 01.00.318 Displays: Display: Resolution: 1600 x 900 Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888) Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Built-In: Yes VGA Display: Resolution: 800 x 600 @ 60 Hz Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888) Mirror: Off Online: Yes Rotation: Supported Display Connector: Status: No Display Connected loaded kexts ATI5000Controller ATIFramebuffer ATIRadeonX3000 ATISupport problems : vlc not working , front row , final cut , etc about the QE/CI i have everything working except water effect in dashboard . and here is my IOREG http://pastebin.com/T2Cjbnhz Thanks In Advance , nassef Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samboh Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Power color hd 5750 (068be) works fully Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spac3man Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 OK, guys, I think I'm closer to finish =) Now when I boot with "GraphicsEnabler=Yes", I have QE/CI, native resolution, BUT all colors are strange. I can read text, but everything looks ugly. What is the problem? ATOM BIOS Rom: SubsystemVendorID: 0x1028 SubsystemID: 0x02aa IOBaseAddress: 0xde00 Filename: BR31245C.001 BIOS Bootup Message: Dell_Roberts_M92S_GDDR3 M92 GDDR3 64bit 450e/600m PCI ID: 1002:9552 Connector at index 0 Type [@offset 45802]: VGA (1) Encoder [@offset 45806]: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_DAC1 (0x15) i2cid [@offset 45846]: 0x91, OSX senseid: 0x2 Connector at index 1 Type [@offset 45812]: LVDS (7) Encoder [@offset 45816]: INTERNAL_UNIPHY2 (0x21) i2cid [@offset 45869]: 0x90, OSX senseid: 0x1 At least, can you tell me please offsets for various framebuffers in your kexts (topic1, BETA3)? I'll try to patch it by myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts