bgrau Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Thanks Azimutz... Another thing, I am now booting Ubuntu with the other O/S 's I already have, and it is very well managed by the Chameleon bootloader which recognised it immediately... Ubuntu 10.10 is great, as good as OS X, plus there are all these freebies that one finds with it... and no need to sweat for drivers... but it was not always like that for Linux ;-) btw I got the dsdt.aml from it, and event though my graphics card is fully recognised with 3D and openGL, no info gets captured in the dsdt.aml (from checking dsdt.dsl)... I wonder why that is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Ubuntu 10.10 is great, as good as OS X,... Blasphemy!!.. yeah, Linux is nice. Just wish software/hardware developers gave it at least the same support they give to OS X. btw I got the dsdt.aml from it, and event though my graphics card is fully recognised with 3D and openGL, no info gets captured in the dsdt.aml (from checking dsdt.dsl)... I wonder why that is? You are just dumping the table already stored on the machine, which is not changed by the system. Mine also doesn't have any graphics info, the desktop one, i mean.. the laptop does have graphics stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgrau Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Blasphemy!!.. yeah, Linux is nice. Just wish software/hardware developers gave it at least the same support they give to OS X. You are just dumping the table already stored on the machine, which is not changed by the system. Mine also doesn't have any graphics info, the desktop one, i mean.. the laptop does have graphics stuff. So I guess if I wish to fool around with it, it is a matter of putting the info myself using as a guide what others did... that is going to be an interesting homework Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Your guess is correct, Bgrau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carstiman Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 hello, just want to tell you that the grafikenabler from 1158 works the first time with my Nvidia GTS450 error message before: nVidia GeForce GTS 450 1024MB NVc3 [10de:0dc4] :: PciRoot(0x1)/Pci(0x1,0x0)/Pci(0x0,0x0) Bad Display Configuration Block signature (UPUQUU?) ERROR: nVidia ROM Patching Failed! should F10 scan for IDE drives too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslieking Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 I'm looking for the latest Chameleon RC5 (trunk) with the Lion patch applied. I downloaded the trunk, but there is no Lion support: svn co -r HEAD http://forge.voodooprojects.org/svn/chameleon Is there a diff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital_dreamer Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 When compiling for the "boot0" or "boot0hfs" using the config switch, is there a way to just compile for that booter, instead of compiling for the whole trunk? No biggy, but I'd like to create both boot files without having to do the full compile. Possible? MAJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 hello, just want to tell you that the grafikenabler from 1158 works the first time with my Nvidia GTS450 Hi Carstiman.. that's good news, but strange at the same time; nothing special was done to the code and your dev id was already present. Do you dual boot with windows?... i know, the question seems to have nothing to do with graphics problems, but check this post on tonymac... should F10 scan for IDE drives too? Not sure about this... why do you ask? I'm looking for the latest Chameleon RC5 (trunk) with the Lion patch applied.I downloaded the trunk, but there is no Lion support:... Lion support was added "long" time ago! Why do you say there's no support? Use svn co -r HEAD http://forge.voodooprojects.org/svn/chameleon/trunk to get just the trunk, if you like. When compiling for the "boot0" or "boot0hfs" using the config switch, is there a way to just compile for that booter, instead of compiling for the whole trunk? No biggy, but I'd like to create both boot files without having to do the full compile. Possible? MAJ Not using "make config". You can compile the file directly with e.g. nasm boot0.s -o boot0 Check "man nasm"; also check the attached boot0.s against the current one for necessary code edit boot0.s.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meklort Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 To just build boot0, run make config, ensure the correct option is checked, the browse to the boot0 directory and run make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital_dreamer Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Not using "make config". You can compile the file directly with e.g. nasm boot0.s -o boot0 Check "man nasm"; also check the attached boot0.s against the current one for necessary code edit Cool! I'm learning this stuff and find it amazing that all these tools are accessable via command line. But, in using nasm none of the symbols in source are defined for compiling. The man page doesn't show any way to include the Makefile rules, but I suppose that is what make is for. I can see that in the makefile, the symbols are defined and nasm is run. I'm liking this stuff. To just build boot0, run make config, ensure the correct option is checked, the browse to the boot0 directory and run make. Awesome. This works a treat. You guys are great! Thanks, again. MAJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 To just build boot0, run make config, ensure the correct option is checked, the browse to the boot0 directory and run make. Damn thing... i'm pretty sure i did that and it failed... but that was before dinner, brain was hungry Thanks Mek, i was hoping that would read this. Cool! I'm learning this stuff and find it amazing that all these tools are accessable via command line.But, in using nasm none of the symbols in source are defined for compiling. The man page doesn't show any way to include the Makefile rules, but I suppose that is what make is for. I can see that in the makefile, the symbols are defined and nasm is run. I'm liking this stuff. Correct, that's why i posted the edited boot0.s; if you run nasm on it, it will do the job. Yeah, this stuff is great and Mek been tuning in some great stuff; i only gave you the command tip because i wasn't able to do it like he explained... i knew he had this setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slice Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Hi meklort, with your branch in the past I was able to do "make image" to create a bootable ISO. Now with trunk I can't. Can you add the feature to the makefile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Just so you know when i upgraded from 1083 to 1156 it caused a KP any clue what is causing the conflict with the boot loader This a asus g73sw using the kexts from a post under laptops ps this is LION GM laptop post http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=261968 Just so you know when i upgraded from 1083 to 1156 it caused a KP any clue what is causing the conflict with the boot loader This a asus g73sw using the kexts from a post under laptops ps this is LION GM laptop post http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=261968 enable c states and p states causes a kernel panic if checked in sys pref PS>>S After upgradeing it to 1160 ... just a sec ago now no gui for boot menu and as long as i dont check c and p state in the prefpanle it wont kp if you need any info ill be more than happy to send it your way my boot file <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>DSDT</key> <string>/Extra/dsdt.aml</string> <key>Default Partition</key> <string>hd(0,1)</string> <key>EthernetBuiltIn</key> <string>Yes</string> <key>GraphicsEnabler</key> <string>Yes</string> <key>Hide Partition</key> <string>hd(0,2) hd(0,3) </string> <key>Kernel</key> <string>mach_kernel</string> <key>Kernel Flags</key> <string>-v</string> <key>Rename Partition</key> <string>hd(0,1) Windows7</string> <key>RestartFix</key> <string>No</string> <key>SMBIOS</key> <string>/Extra/smbios.plist</string> <key>Theme</key> <string>Bullet</string> <key>Timeout</key> <string>2</string> <key>Wait</key> <string>Yes</string> </dict> </plist> and yes it is named correctly my sys info Software Mac OS X Lion 10.7 (11A511) Hardware Overview: Model Name: MacBook Pro Model Identifier: MacBookPro8,1 Processor Name: Intel Core i7 Processor Speed: 2.00 GHz Number of Processors: 1 Total Number of Cores: 4 L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB L3 Cache: 6 MB Memory: 8 GB Bus Speed: 400 MHz Boot ROM Version: MBP81.0047.B04 SMC Version (system): 1.30f3 Hardware UUID: 64BFEC8E-601A-5A2A-9A12-97D03DDF236C I am wanting ti to default to my windows 7 partition but it won't for some reason ok got the partition map fixed .... even know this is the second drive the boot loader thinks its the first ... weird however now i get a nother panic this seems to be random Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital_dreamer Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 I know you're not supposed to edit the autoconfig files (3 of them), but I'm writing a script to automatically build both boot0 booters (bootable HFS+ first and active partitions first) in advance. I see what needs to be edited, so is it safe to edit the three files at the root of the source, or are there other considerations I must make? What I'm not exactly clear on is whether these are the only files that get edited by the configuration utility, which I wish to bypass. best of wishes, MAJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meklort Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 It's safe to edit, assuming you edit all of them, however it's be better to just edit .config instead. When you run make, the 3 auto generated file will be regenerated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Hurt Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I don't know if this has been said before Install Chameleon to an HFS+ formatted USB stick. Try booting, it detects the OS X root partition as hd(1,2) instead of hd(0,2) and keeps giving an error about not finding the mach_kernel. Sorry if this has been asked, answered before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 (edited) Install Chameleon to an HFS+ formatted USB stick.Try booting, it detects the OS X root partition as hd(1,2) instead of hd(0,2) and keeps giving an error about not finding the mach_kernel. Doc, that's just how Chameleon works; for him, the volume were it's installed it's always hd(0,x); other hd's are shown in the bios order. About the kernel, i can check, but it should find it; it's always loaded from the select volume. Beware that the boot0 that Chameleon compilation produces by default is in fact boot0hfs. <key>Default Partition</key> <string>hd(0,1)</string> I am wanting ti to default to my windows 7 partition but it won't for some reason Linear, read above... and yes it is named correctly enable c states and p states causes a kernel panic if checked in sys pref Are you sure?... and this, "... in sys pref", what does it mean?.. Boot.plist in system preferences? weird however now i get a nother panic this seems to be random Not sure about this kp; can't test Lion. -----//----- p.s.: compiled binaries can be downloaded from Voodoo forums; follow the "trunk build" link on my signature. I know the link is only available to registered users; can't do nothing about that. But, there will be news on fresh compiled binaries soon... stay tuned Edited July 17, 2011 by Azimutz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednous Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Just dropping by here to tell all the devs including the humble Azimutz that rev 1164 is fine for me with Lion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Thanks for the feedback, Rednous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslieking Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Lion support was added "long" time ago! Why do you say there's no support?Use svn co -r HEAD http://forge.voodooprojects.org/svn/chameleon/trunk to get just the trunk, if you like. I didn't notice the additional code in boot.c. It was a cache problem with Google Chrome. It works. Thank you! How can I obtain the version number of the Trunk? Chameleon-2.0-RC5-rxxxx-bin.zip I'm talking about the four number "rxxxx-bin.zip" marked with xxxx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimutz Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 How can I obtain the version number of the Trunk? The easiest way is svn log path/to/trunk/working folder then hit Home key and the latest commit to the trunk will be at the top. Same applies to any other versioned file or folder; only the commits done to the file or folder will be shown. $svn help is your friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farhanito Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 The easiest way is svn log path/to/trunk/working folder then hit Home key and the latest commit to the trunk will be at the top. Same applies to any other versioned file or folder; only the commits done to the file or folder will be shown. $svn help is your friend i thought this might helped i've been using svnx for a while to track changes in chameleon trunk (and branches) http://code.google.com/p/svnx/ i'm too lazy to deal with command lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 FYI 1164 fixed the kp with the cstate and pstate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Anyone knows why my boot process hangs for 10-20sec if I'm using a newer build than r1096? I searched for what changed then, but can't find anything. Any idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinearBurn Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Anyone knows why my boot process hangs for 10-20sec if I'm using a newer build than r1096? I searched for what changed then, but can't find anything. Any idea? boot with -v see if shows what its holding on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts