Korrupted Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Over at www.geekpatrol.ca, they have a benchmark program for Windows, Linux, and OSX that tests your box based on Math tests and jpeg compressions. On the Hackintosh IRC, we did some benchmarks, and Chapel stomped everyone with his 3.5GHz Pentium D 920: My MBP(1.83Ghz, 512MB) did somewhat decent. <.> EDIT: added a new image showing the Mac Pro, and the Quad G5 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
aberracus Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Some Results mine is the First one 3488 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.00GHz x 2 202.8 <<<<<<<<<< Modestly mine 3485 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Core2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz x 2 299.7 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Core2Duo 6300 w/o overclock . WOW 3483 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.20GHz x 1 145.5 3482 iMac G5 (Ambient Light Sensor) PowerPC G5 (970) x 1 117.1 3481 Apple Computer, Inc. MacBookPro1,1 Genuine Intel® CPU T2500 @ 2.00GHz x 2 203.3 3479 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.20GHz x 2 187.4 3478 iMac G5 (Ambient Light Sensor) PowerPC G5 (970) x 1 98.1 3477 Power Mac G5 (June 2004) PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 164.5 3476 Power Mac G5 (June 2004) PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 150.9 3475 Rosetta PowerPC G4 (7400) x 2 158.8 3474 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.80GHz x 2 239.7 3473 Rosetta PowerPC G4 (7400) x 2 85.8 3472 Power Mac G5 (June 2004) PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 149.9 3471 Power Mac G5 (June 2004) PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 149.4 3470 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz x 2 131.3 3467 empty empty Dual-Core AMD Opteron Processor 2218 x 4 250.7 <<<<<< i left this one for comparision only, running Windows XP 3466 Power Mac G5 (Late 2005) PowerPC G5 (970) x 4 284.5 3465 MacBook Genuine Intel® CPU T2500 @ 2.00GHz x 2 150.9 3464 Developer Transition Kit Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.20GHz x 1 159.4 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-161741 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Interesting things to note: Test on Windows vs Test on OSX. Windows was about 10% high (203 vs 181) So results you see for windows machines cannot really be held in point for point. HTT seems to make no difference to test. Making a dual core run on one core has a drop in speed, but not close to 50%. MacPros make me cry. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-161760 Share on other sites More sharing options...
asap18 Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 My macbook 1.83 with 2 gig of ram got a 173. Is that good? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-162059 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conroe Mac Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 Wow. Mac Pro demolishes everything. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-162061 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrey Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I agree with the addition of GeekBench to our multitude of benchmarking programs. Although, since synthetic benchmarking is oft criticized for accuracy and thus fairly taboo, I think listing scores from as many utilities as possible is necessary to get the best overview of a machine's performance. That being said, I was more than happy with my 155.4 in GeekBench, but I've also included marks for all benchmarking software I currently run in my signature. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-174077 Share on other sites More sharing options...
quixos Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=4350 Overall Score: 138.7 not too shabby for a... Asrock P4Dual-915GL Socket 478 Motherboard Pentium 4 @ 3.0 GHz Northwood Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-174126 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AREOS Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=4350 Overall Score: 138.7 not too shabby for a... Asrock P4Dual-915GL Socket 478 Motherboard Pentium 4 @ 3.0 GHz Northwood Hi I got http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7473 Is that ok? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-208967 Share on other sites More sharing options...
aberracus Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 My new result are 266.8 now really it feels better... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-208987 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toleman Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Mine 187.5 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7507 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-209504 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonz14 Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 If I said mine was 92.1 would you make fun of me? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-209590 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackHair Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 I'm getting 193.2 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7531 and with Rosetta 127.6 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7532 not bad i guess Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-209878 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bptba93 Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 if you ask me my laptop sucks a$$ http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7548 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-210228 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AREOS Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 My macbook Pro 17" http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7733 179 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-213686 Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanakorizo Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 lol look this http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7717 for sure not mine mine are about 110 does it matter that my geforce is not QE enabled etc? the tests are about the cpu only or the gpu also? cause if it matters im sure it will be double than this and i must feel ok Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-213924 Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguelcerca Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 my scores while running firefox, photoshop, azureus, itunes: 140.4 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7758 w/ rosetta: 90.6 http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7759 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-214086 Share on other sites More sharing options...
consolation Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Yeah, it's time to move on from Xbench. It's the most BS benchmarking suite EVER. Especially the graphics part of it, my G4 benches the same with 5200 and 9800pro; that's just laughable. XBench has taken a LOT of flack, I was very surprised to find people here still using it. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-214107 Share on other sites More sharing options...
suleiman Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 My MBP 2.0ghz got a 179.5, which I'm pretty impressed with all things considered. http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7765 I saw someone else on here got a 179.9 from their MBP 2.16 ghz and my score's not too far behind that. What's really rocking my mind is those insane Mac Pro scores, and the scores some of you are getting with your mac hacks. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-214185 Share on other sites More sharing options...
munky Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 hmm... my macbook 1.83 (2gb ram) gets 162 / 101, which is slower than asap's 173. interesting.. wonder if he has better RAM? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-214257 Share on other sites More sharing options...
numberonekiwi Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Overall Score: 133.1 not to bad I suppose http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8200 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-218223 Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalMACNUT Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Here's Mine. Nothing special. First test = http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8202 ( 132.6 ) Rosetta test = http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8203 ( 83.8 ) Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-218229 Share on other sites More sharing options...
matemago Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 i overclocked my cpu from 2.8 to 3.3 and now i get geekbench 216.7... http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9027 so i think i'm running ok. i have: Pentium D820 2.8Ghz oc to 3.3Ghz Seagate 250Gb SATA II 1Gb 533Mhz Kingston RAM DDR2 ASUS P5LD2-VM SE Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-229561 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubhead Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Processor: Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.00GHz Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 15 Model 6 Stepping 2 Logical Processor Count: 2 Physical Processor Count: 2 Processor Frequency: 3990 MHz Bus Frequency: 960 MHz Memory: 1024 MB Geekbench:Overall Score: 253.8 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-232419 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaS Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 I will post my results once the Mac Pro gets here Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-232433 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark4181 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 ^do you have a date for that, btw? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/24318-i-propose-this-to-be-the-new-standard-benchmark/#findComment-232503 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts