marnsue Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 coda when u force it into 1200x800 .... do u have the option in system preferences>display? i quite dont get why im unable to achieve anything but1024x768 and others are .... from what uve posted im pretty much there with u... differences ive had were i was running 64bit and your vadriver.bundle boot dual gpu>true was false for me..... goin 32bit and placing dbootgpu to true didnt do anything i also changed the identifier to macbookpro6,1 hoping that would help since mine was set to macpro...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coda Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 coda when u force it into 1200x800 .... do u have the option in system preferences>display? i quite dont get why im unable to achieve anything but1024x768 and others are .... from what uve posted im pretty much there with u... differences ive had were i was running 64bit and your vadriver.bundle boot dual gpu>true was false for me..... goin 32bit and placing dbootgpu to true didnt do anything i also changed the identifier to macbookpro6,1 hoping that would help since mine was set to macpro...... i didnt force anything, although i have set 1600x900 in *.boot.plist. In system preferences there are no options to change the resolution. I re-enabled the *vadriver.bundle and left the *fb.kext disabled and it still boots to 1280x800. I have a problem at the moment though, i changed something and now the machine wont boot at all. Boot with -v just shows a hang after loading /system/library/coreservices/<someplist>.plist right at the beginning. Sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G. Steel Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Why not make it a competition to write a driver with a prize? With all the budget notebooks with just Intel HD graphics out there (like the i5 Fujitsu lifebook) I would contribute $15.00 to the prize. What do you all think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiox89 Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 15$? few I tell you, if someone makes the driver, whoever wants the driver can make a donation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philz Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Well I hope someone does. It's worth a lot to me so I'd gladly donate quite a bit (50-100$ depending how complicated the final solution was!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowRidinCrew Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'd rather it be done for free then look for donations later lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philz Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'd rather it be done for free then look for donations later lol. Oh agreed completely, need to see it done first, but it's still what some need to start work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G. Steel Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Exactly, don't the Haiku folks use a "bounty" to get a few necessary things done? Look at dutchhockeypro's threads they are the most informative and the most systematic. Looking for Intel HD support just to come out is probably a very low probability event. Maybe one of the debian driver devs will port it and we will all celebrate! Oh agreed completely, need to see it done first, but it's still what some need to start work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafirafi Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Oh it's not good, look more and more like the gma4500 thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowRidinCrew Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 It's a matter of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riws Posted March 12, 2011 Share Posted March 12, 2011 Has someone tried with AppleIntelSNBGraphicsFB.kext? The newest MacBook has only Intel HD as GFX. ID's supported in custom AppleIntelHDGraphics 10.6.6: 0x00448086 0x00468086 0x01068086 0x01168086 0x01028086 0x01268086 0x010b8086 0x01128086 0x01228086 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowTerminal Posted March 12, 2011 Share Posted March 12, 2011 Has someone tried with AppleIntelSNBGraphicsFB.kext? The newest MacBook has only Intel HD as GFX. ID's suppoerted in custom AppleIntelHDGraphics 10.6.6: I did, but didn't work for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurick Posted March 12, 2011 Share Posted March 12, 2011 now everything seems to be new Kest on intel graphics controller ... and also rented me that apple controller sits on another address http://www.mediafire.com/?3lk171pxap4poea 12 kexts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philz Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 now everything seems to be new Kest on intel graphics controller ... and also rented me that apple controller sits on another address http://www.mediafire.com/?3lk171pxap4poea 12 kexts Anything new with these kexts? Don't exactly understand where they are from... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurick Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Anything new with these kexts? Don't exactly understand where they are from... this kexts with macbookpro 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowRidinCrew Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Ok, I'm going to reinstall OSX on my Gateway NV7915u Laptop soon, (10.6.3) so I can give some feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mehdymehdy Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 seems like nobody was able to get anything done. although now we get the kexts to load. it's so sad that none of the experts are joining to fix the intelHD, oh and don't keep ur hopes up for mac lion cus it will give u the same results. just like the other intel kexts that needed a natit to work this one needs a natit too. i hope someone with some knowledge pays some attention to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowRidinCrew Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 question what is natit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marnsue Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 question what is natit its a graphics injector that suppose to help you get to native resolution. It does not help me one bit. To update on my status, after spending a whole lot of time on this, im finally giving up. My little knowledge simply cant get me to where id like to be, which ultimately is just native resolution ..... What puzzles me the most is the fact that some folks are at least able to get over the 1024x768 res. Some even say that simple graphics mode string got them the native resolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiox89 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Some even say that simple graphics mode string got them the native resolution. Native resolution with graphics mode string?? I do not think so, but I with chameleon can set the resolution 1280x1024 (native 1376x768) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowRidinCrew Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Basically, have to recode it? or have it read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedis Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Has someone tried with AppleIntelSNBGraphicsFB.kext? The newest MacBook has only Intel HD as GFX. ID's supported in custom AppleIntelHDGraphics 10.6.6: 0x00448086 0x00468086 0x01068086 0x01168086 0x01028086 0x01268086 0x010b8086 0x01128086 0x01228086 That's interesting because my ID (bolded) is there but doesn't work. 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Arrandale DRAM Controller [8086:0044] (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Arrandale Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 02) My native resolutions works in all 10.6.* versions with i5-540m (Arrandale) with Integrated Intel HD graphics (no discrete card). However, the OSX desktop never loads with the new AppleIntelHD* kexts. If I remove them, it works and 10.6.7 boots fine. No QE/CI accelerated graphics though Also willing to donate to someone who can figure this out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sockerkid Posted March 26, 2011 Author Share Posted March 26, 2011 That's interesting because my ID (bolded) is there but doesn't work. 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Arrandale DRAM Controller [8086:0044] (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Arrandale Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 02) My native resolutions works in all 10.6.* versions with i5-540m (Arrandale) with Integrated Intel HD graphics (no discrete card). However, the OSX desktop never loads with the new AppleIntelHD* kexts. If I remove them, it works and 10.6.7 boots fine. No QE/CI accelerated graphics though Also willing to donate to someone who can figure this out! hello Jedis, how u manage to get Native Resolution in ur OSX? do u mind elaborating? thanks.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedis Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 hello Jedis, how u manage to get Native Resolution in ur OSX? do u mind elaborating? thanks.. DSDT and setting the resolution in boot.plist. Though I think it worked even before I had the DSDT made. Without the setting in boot.plist , it was the default 1024x768 that was horribly stretched on my laptop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sockerkid Posted March 26, 2011 Author Share Posted March 26, 2011 DSDT and setting the resolution in boot.plist. Though I think it worked even before I had the DSDT made. Without the setting in boot.plist , it was the default 1024x768 that was horribly stretched on my laptop. thanks for reply my message in quick, errm is ur resolution now 1280 x 768? which bootloader are u using? chameleon RC5 or RC4 or bootefi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts