valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 @Aivarz, I need to ask u something, which boot-loader were u using before this one? did it give the right fsb value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednous Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 valv, sorry for the off topic question but is it good to extract my ACPI tables (SSDT, FADT, etc.) with the Ubuntu method you described in your MacBookPro 18 project thread then copy them to /Extra and try to load them via boot.plist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aivarz Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 @Aivarz,I need to ask u something, which boot-loader were u using before this one? did it give the right fsb value? No problem with previous release, dated 06-04-2010. And before that - AsereBLN 1.1.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 valv, sorry for the off topic question but is it good to extract my ACPI tables (SSDT, FADT, etc.) with the Ubuntu method you described in your MacBookPro 18 project thread then copy them to /Extra and try to load them via boot.plist? I'd encourage u to do this @Aivarz, Ok, I take note. I have to try something, brb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniac10 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Hi there valv, I'm having a very tiny issue with alpha4, my cpu is not recognized as it used to with older versions. Everything else seems fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 Hi there valv, I'm having a very tiny issue with alpha4, my cpu is not recognized as it used to with older versions. Everything else seems fine. hi eMatoS, thank u for testing. am actually working on those issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kup Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Out of interest, what did you change to make the recent test builds behave so differently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 Out of interest, what did you change to make the recent test builds behave so differently? what do u mean by out of interest If u 'r talking about this big mess, I was expecting such issues, and I hoped people test it before I do commit. This way we avoid sticking with unstable/unusable code. Once again, this is still in alpha stage, but things look good so far. sorry, I just did not follow (brainstorm: 100.000 kWh) btw, here is the next candidate alpha5.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kup Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 I was just curious what you were changing and if you were expecting certain bugs or not? No offense meant it by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aivarz Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Everything seems to be OK with bus/cpu/mem frequencies using alpha5. What else should we check? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 I was just curious what you were changing and if you were expecting certain bugs or not? No offense meant it by it. oh my dear, sorry, sorry, sorry, like I was saying, am actually using my unmanageable brain, and it makes me do, think and say differently. so my apologies again. and as I was telling, further posts earlier, fsb detection mechanism is totally reworked. also the cpu part (hopefully to support more core i without breaking the actually supported ones). Next got rid (don't know if it works now) of FADT dependency to DSDT + more nVidia graphic cards id's + things I can't remember by now. Everything seems to be OK with bus/cpu/mem frequencies using alpha5. What else should we check? good to know that. what about the previous messages at boot time ? also I'd like to know if u have the same issue as rednous:“…when i open a new browser tab or refresh the current one, preview files on the desktop, open Illustrator or Photoshop, the sound form iTunes becomes noisy and hissing, stops for a 2-10 seconds.“ thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednous Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 alpha5 seems to be OK for me, too. the nasty sound bug disappeared also the CPU and FSB are reported correctly. valv, nice build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 alpha5 seems to be OK for me, too. the nasty sound bug disappeared also the CPU and FSB are reported correctly.valv, nice build woohoo, that's news. just need to have a feedback from eMatoS or some guyz using an AMD cpu. anybody? btw, if someone have issues, please tell. Waiting for your posts before committing btw, did I forget somebody's issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar87 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 alpha5 still reports my FSB wrong: 533 Mhz And I need "UseMemDetect Yes" in my boot.plist, to show my DDR3 mem as DDR3 (otherwise it will show DDR2) but when i use Memdetect, i get this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 @edgar87, gimme specs of your DDR3, and I'll see what can be done. btw, u could also inject your memory values directly from smbios.plist. regarding cpu, do a sudo sysctl -a | grep cpu on terminal and post the dump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar87 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 @valv: This are my DDR3 specs: http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KHX1600C8D3K4_8GX.pdf I have it running on 1333 mhz speed (not 1600 mhz) @ 9-9-9-24 timings "sudo sysctl -a | grep cpu" gives me this: hw.ncpu = 8 hw.cpufrequency = 2931000000 hw.availcpu = 8 hw.ncpu: 8 hw.activecpu: 8 hw.physicalcpu: 4 hw.physicalcpu_max: 4 hw.logicalcpu: 8 hw.logicalcpu_max: 8 hw.cputype: 7 hw.cpusubtype: 4 hw.cpu64bit_capable: 1 hw.cpufamily: 1801080018 hw.cpufrequency: 2931000000 hw.cpufrequency_min: 2931000000 hw.cpufrequency_max: 2931000000 hw.cputhreadtype: 1 machdep.cpu.max_basic: 11 machdep.cpu.max_ext: 2147483656 machdep.cpu.vendor: GenuineIntel machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU K 875 @ 2.93GHz machdep.cpu.family: 6 machdep.cpu.model: 30 machdep.cpu.extmodel: 1 machdep.cpu.extfamily: 0 machdep.cpu.stepping: 5 machdep.cpu.feature_bits: 3219913727 10019837 machdep.cpu.extfeature_bits: 672139520 1 machdep.cpu.signature: 67301 machdep.cpu.brand: 0 machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS HTT TM SSE3 MON DSCPL VMX SMX EST TM2 SSSE3 CX16 TPR PDCM SSE4.1 SSE4.2 POPCNT machdep.cpu.extfeatures: SYSCALL XD RDTSCP EM64T LAHF TSCI machdep.cpu.logical_per_package: 16 machdep.cpu.cores_per_package: 8 machdep.cpu.microcode_version: 3 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_min: 64 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_max: 64 machdep.cpu.mwait.extensions: 3 machdep.cpu.mwait.sub_Cstates: 4384 machdep.cpu.thermal.sensor: 1 machdep.cpu.thermal.dynamic_acceleration: 1 machdep.cpu.thermal.invariant_APIC_timer: 0 machdep.cpu.thermal.thresholds: 2 machdep.cpu.thermal.ACNT_MCNT: 1 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.version: 3 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.number: 4 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.width: 48 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.events_number: 7 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.events: 68 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.fixed_number: 3 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.fixed_width: 48 machdep.cpu.cache.linesize: 64 machdep.cpu.cache.L2_associativity: 6 machdep.cpu.cache.size: 256 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.small: 64 machdep.cpu.tlb.inst.large: 7 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.small: 64 machdep.cpu.tlb.data.large: 32 machdep.cpu.tlb.shared: 512 machdep.cpu.address_bits.physical: 36 machdep.cpu.address_bits.virtual: 48 machdep.cpu.core_count: 4 machdep.cpu.thread_count: 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 edgar87, I need to ask u which boot-loader you've been using before this one? and what fsb value was showing? One last request, please edit your last post, and try to use quotes ore codebox for the dump. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar87 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 I've used ur previous versions of ur bootloader and the Asere 1.19 bootloader before. But all gives me a 533 mhz FSB. (ive edited my previous post with code tags) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednous Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 woohoo, that's news.just need to have a feedback from eMatoS or some guyz using an AMD cpu. anybody? btw, if someone have issues, please tell. Waiting for your posts before committing btw, did I forget somebody's issue? yes i would like to ask you which of the following tables (extracted under Ubuntu) should i copy to /Extra: RSDP, RSDT, FACP, FACS, HPET, MCFG, TAMG, and APIC? also is it good to rename all 6 SSDT tables (extracted under Ubuntu) to SSDT-0...SSDT-6? The names of those 6 SSDT tables under Ubuntu are: Cpu0Cst, Cpu1Cst, Cpu2Cst, Cpu3Cst, CpuPm, Cpu0Ist, and Cpu1Ist. I wonder if i have to copy them in /Extra, cause i have SpeedStep implemented in my current DSDT. thanx again for your hard work and helping us answering so many questions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 I've used ur previous versions of ur bootloader and the Asere 1.19 bootloader before. But all gives me a 533 mhz FSB. (ive edited my previous post with code tags) thank u, and sorry 'cause I don't think I'd be able to do something for FSB this time. if your 875k is the same as 875, don't worry, it could be done but it is more complicated than I thought. Also for the Memory part, u should give some time, maybe next release I already taken note on my todo list (high priority). till then u can stick with smbios.plist values. yes i would like to ask you which of the following tables (extracted under Ubuntu) should i copy to /Extra: RSDP, RSDT, FACP, FACS, HPET, MCFG, TAMG, and APIC? It's ok,also is it good to rename all 6 SSDT tables (extracted under Ubuntu) to SSDT-0...SSDT-6?This is the way it has to be done, sorry for not specifying it earlier.The names of those 6 SSDT tables under Ubuntu are: Cpu0Cst, Cpu1Cst, Cpu2Cst, Cpu3Cst, CpuPm, Cpu0Ist, and Cpu1Ist. I wonder if i have to copy them in /Extra, cause i have SpeedStep implemented in my current DSDT.If speed-step is working no need for those.thanx again for your hard work and helping us answering so many questions glad u find it of a use to u Greetz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar87 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 np! thnx for looking @ it. I still think u have made a great bootloader! Hope to see it fixed soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniac10 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Sorry for the delay, alpha5 is detecting correctly my athlon64 (disguised as an intel core solo) One thing I've never seen working is my memory detection, I've always used smbios to set it right but it doesn't really matter. Thank you valv for your hard work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 np! thnx for looking @ it.I still think u have made a great bootloader! Hope to see it fixed soon. thank u, this is encouraging me to give it a further try, don't give up my friend. but as your cpu is seemly new, it is not possible to detect it correctly with the actual code's stage. I'm optimistic about fsb detection, ram I don't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizwan Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 @valv, I want to test your alpha booter but I don't have time yet. I'll try it as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valv Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 Sorry for the delay, alpha5 is detecting correctly my athlon64 (disguised as an intel core solo)hey, that's good to knowOne thing I've never seen working is my memory detection, I've always used smbios to set it right but it doesn't really matter.Thank you valv for your hard work. I'll tell u a secret personally I use smbios injection for this, dunno why I prefer it that way. Maybe just a feeling of calculus avoidance = easier boot = lesser bad surprises no, seriously, I'll look further at it...one day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts