frankx86 Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Salve a tutti ragazzi,volevo sapere se questi valori in generale e per il q6600 in default sono giuste o devo dare colpa a ideneb 1.4 con kernel vanilla? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daveta Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 ma usa geekbench o cinebench, Xbench è inaffidabile.... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191477 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorgio_multi Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Salve a tutti ragazzi,volevo sapere se questi valori in generale e per il q6600 in default sono giuste o devo dare colpa a ideneb 1.4 con kernel vanilla? Che scheda video hai? Giorgio Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191478 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankx86 Posted July 3, 2009 Author Share Posted July 3, 2009 grazie per le risposte ho una EN8400gs 256mb chip geforce (QE CI attivi) ? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191484 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorgio_multi Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 grazie per le risposte ho una EN8400gs 256mb chip geforce (QE CI attivi) ? Prova a cambiare NVkush.kext con NVinject.kext 0.2.1 256MB (ovviamente poi puoi ritornare a NVKush) Comunque non è malaccio come prestazioni. Giorgio Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191485 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankx86 Posted July 3, 2009 Author Share Posted July 3, 2009 Summary Section Description Score Geekbench Score Geekbench 2.1.2 for Mac OS X x86 (32-bit) Integer Processor integer performance 4343 5080 Floating Point Processor floating point performance 7870 Memory Memory performance 2804 Stream Memory bandwidth performance 2453 System Information Operating System Mac OS X 10.5.6 (Build 9G55) Model Hackintosh Motherboard ASUSTeK Computer INC. P5Q Rev 1.xx Processor Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 11 Processors 1 Threads 4 Cores 4 Memory 4.00 GB 1066 MHz DDR2 SDRAM Processor Frequency 1.60 GHz Bus Frequency 1.06 GHz L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB L2 Cache 4.00 MB L3 Cache 0.00 B BIOS American Megatrends Inc. 2102 Integer Section Section Score 4343 Blowfish single-threaded scalar 1310 57.6 MB/sec Blowfish multi-threaded scalar 6444 264.1 MB/sec Text Compress single-threaded scalar 1888 6.04 MB/sec Text Compress multi-threaded scalar 6880 22.6 MB/sec Text Decompress single-threaded scalar 1668 6.86 MB/sec Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar 6501 25.9 MB/sec Image Compress single-threaded scalar 1737 14.4 Mpixels/sec Image Compress multi-threaded scalar 6525 54.9 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress single-threaded scalar 1411 23.7 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar 5241 85.5 Mpixels/sec Lua single-threaded scalar 2622 1.01 Mnodes/sec Lua multi-threaded scalar 9899 3.81 Mnodes/sec Floating Point Section Section Score 7870 Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar 1796 1.20 Gflops Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar 6931 4.54 Gflops Dot Product single-threaded scalar 3291 1.59 Gflops Dot Product multi-threaded scalar 13209 6.02 Gflops Dot Product single-threaded vector 2635 3.16 Gflops Dot Product multi-threaded vector 12038 12.5 Gflops LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar 680 605.4 Mflops LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar 2741 2.40 Gflops Primality Test single-threaded scalar 3413 509.8 Mflops Primality Test multi-threaded scalar 10216 1.90 Gflops Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar 4849 11.3 Mpixels/sec Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar 18611 42.9 Mpixels/sec Blur Image single-threaded scalar 6252 4.95 Mpixels/sec Blur Image multi-threaded scalar 23521 18.5 Mpixels/sec Memory Section Section Score 2804 Read Sequential single-threaded scalar 3803 4.66 GB/sec Write Sequential single-threaded scalar 3599 2.46 GB/sec Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar 1963 7.33 Mallocs/sec Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar 2170 4.49 GB/sec Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar 2486 2.56 GB/sec Stream Section Section Score 2453 Stream Copy single-threaded scalar 2326 3.18 GB/sec Stream Copy single-threaded vector 2786 3.61 GB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded scalar 2760 3.58 GB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded vector 2735 3.69 GB/sec Stream Add single-threaded scalar 1864 2.81 GB/sec Stream Add single-threaded vector 3017 4.20 GB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded scalar 2073 2.87 GB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded vector 2063 3.86 GB/sec con geekbench ho notato che stressa notevolmente al massimo la cpu...credo sia molto più attendibile come riferimento?. comunque se cambio kekxt video perdo il QE e CI ... mi resta sempre il dubbio che il processore non và come dovrebbe...o no? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191488 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorgio_multi Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Non eccelse, ma accettabili. Bassine quelle della RAM Giorgio Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191490 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daveta Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 ho già consigliato di pubblicare sti elenchi in un file allegato, se no diventa tutto un casino...hai provato pure con geek o cine? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1191493 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankx86 Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 si ho già provato con geek,gia postato, Nel dubbio domanda assurda?!... come faccio a sapere se il processore sta lavorando bene? o magari va solo a 2 core? ricordo che sulla p5b-vm con xbench ottenevo cpu test 150 circa ora con la p5q 104. oppure sarà colpa del kernell? OSX86Tools: System Kernel information: Darwin frankie-frankies-macpro31.local 9.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.5.0: Sat Dec 6 19:39:54 IST 2008; Voodoo; Release 1.0 :xnu-1228.7.58/BUILD/obj/RELEASE_I386 i386 {Unknown Make} 9.5.0 Kernel ? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1192266 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankx86 Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 non c'è nessuno? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1192347 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorgio_multi Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 non c'è nessuno? Vai in Utility e apri Monitoraggio Attivitàe in CPU vedi se il grafico ti fa vedere i 4 core. Giorgio Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1192354 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cavallo Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 il mio pro ha valori piu bassi pero' mi masterizza in 52 minuti un file .mov di 2.25 ore, i bench sono, non farmelo dire... attenzione masterizza, compresa codifica file di quasi 100 gb. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1192521 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorgio_multi Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 il mio pro ha valori piu bassi pero' mi masterizza in 52 minuti un file .mov di 2.25 ore, i bench sono, non farmelo dire...attenzione masterizza, compresa codifica file di quasi 100 gb. E qui sono io ad essere d'accordo, guardate meno i Benchmark e badate di più a come risponde il sistema all'utilizzo quotidiano. Giorgio Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1192522 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankx86 Posted July 6, 2009 Author Share Posted July 6, 2009 si, in effetti vedo i 4 core. grazie a tutti per il supporto Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/173391-prestazioni-basse-xbench/#findComment-1193491 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts