dorts Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Finally got it working! With only 2 P-States only though. Works wonderfully, except for a little sound shuttering. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercurysquad Posted August 10, 2008 Author Share Posted August 10, 2008 Finally got it working! With only 2 P-States only though. Works wonderfully, except for a little sound shuttering. Thanks! You can try making your own PState table in multiples of your FSB to get more than 2 states, and it might just work. No guarantees though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titooo Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Thanks for the fantastic work guys. It's excellent to have sleep kernel with speedstep options, but I think I already can have it using coolbook So what advantages will I take using this method instead of Coolbook? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riley Freeman Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Finally got it working! With only 2 P-States only though. Works wonderfully, except for a little sound shuttering. Thanks! Cool. Can you post what you added to your info.plist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipolas Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Hello, Thank you very much for this kext, which works great on my computer. So, sleep works (resume too), and speedstep seems to work. The only problem is that sound is stuttering... But I have a question, when I do sudo dmesg | grep IntelEnhancedSpeedStep, I have IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done.IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 3 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x617 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 3 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x617 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 0 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xc21 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 0 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xc21 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 3 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x617 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 0 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xc21 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 0 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xc21 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 1 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0xa1f IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 3 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x617 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 2 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x81b IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttling to PState 3 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Starting throttle with CTL 0x617 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Throttle done. I haven't got IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO Initializing version 1.2.1c © Prashant Vaibhav <mercurysquad@yahoo.com>IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Probing for Intel processor... IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO Supported Intel processor found on your system IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Processor Family 6, Model 15 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO Starting IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG FSB = 233 MHz (OK) IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO On your processor, voltages can be changed in 16 mV steps IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Using data from CPU0 IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Found 3 P-States IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO P-State 0: 2330 MHz at 1564 mV, consuming 88 W, latency 160 usec IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO P-State 1: 1864 MHz at 1564 mV, consuming 71 W, latency 160 usec IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO P-State 2: 1398 MHz at 1564 mV, consuming 56 W, latency 160 usec IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: DBG Using 3 PStates. whereas some of you did have. But, when I do sysctl -a | grep throttle I have:when I select 1200 with the app speedstep : kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 1200 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1000 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 1559 When I select 1600: kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 1600 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1050 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 2075 When I select 2000 kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 2000 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1100 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 2591 and when I select 2400: kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 2400 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1125 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 3105 What does kern.exec: unknown type returned means ? Are you sure that the volt of my computer change? I hope when I am at 1200 my volt isn't at 1125 but at 1000 Thank you very much for your help, and sorry for my bad english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Thanks for the fantastic work guys. It's excellent to have sleep kernel with speedstep options, but I think I already can have it using coolbook So what advantages will I take using this method instead of Coolbook? Thanks Coolbook didnt use Speedstep function of the CPU ! Coolbook sets the fuctions all by itself (CPU work, not buildin speedstep function) So more CPU time usage than using speedstep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiwi Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 There is a Speedstep GUI beta thread ? Preferences aren't saved after reboot, and voltage change don't seems to work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercurysquad Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 Thanks for the fantastic work guys. It's excellent to have sleep kernel with speedstep options, but I think I already can have it using coolbook So what advantages will I take using this method instead of Coolbook? Thanks Coolbook is not free. Coolbook only does undervolting, no speedstep Coolbook expects AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement.kext to exist and do the speedstepping work, which most hacks don't have Coolbook doesn't work on a lot of real macs, let alone hackintosh. It doesn't support Pentium4 or M Coolbook assumes 12.5 mV steps regardless of CPU type. Coolbook doesn't send clock recalibration signals to the kernel for CPUs without constant tsc. Coolbook is not developed by a hackintosh user with no sourcecode available ..That's enough for now. I think this kext works better than Coolbook in just about every way, and supports more computers too. The only thing which Coolbook allegedly has over the kext is support for N/2 bus ratio, which I'll add to v1.3 soon so people can go below 1Ghz. But then I've not seen anyone use Coolbook to go below 1Ghz either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemphys Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Works great with Intel Centrino Duo @ 1.83 Ghz on Toshiba U200 laptop with Vanilla 9.4.0 Kernel (sleep works fine, too!) Thank you guys! You made my life easier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipolas Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Hello,Thank you very much for this kext, which works great on my computer. So, sleep works (resume too), and speedstep seems to work. The only problem is that sound is stuttering... But I have a question, when I do , I have I haven't got whereas some of you did have. But, when I do I have: when I select 1200 with the app speedstep : kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 1200 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1000 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 1559 When I select 1600: kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 1600 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1050 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 2075 When I select 2000 kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 2000 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1100 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 2591 and when I select 2400: kern.exec: unknown type returned kern.cputhrottle_curfreq: 2400 kern.cputhrottle_curvolt: 1125 kern.cputhrottle_freqs: 1200 1600 2000 2400 kern.cputhrottle_factoryvolts: 1000 1050 1100 1137 kern.cputhrottle_ctl: 3105 What does kern.exec: unknown type returned means ? Are you sure that the volt of my computer change? I hope when I am at 1200 my volt isn't at 1125 but at 1000 Thank you very much for your help, and sorry for my bad english. Hello, I have an another problem: When I put my cpu at 1200 and I don't touch my computer during 3hours (for exemple), my fans are working (and making a lot of noise) and my computer is hot. When I stay 3 hours on windows vista and I don't touch the computer, fans aren't working and computer is cold. What's the problem? Must I have to use an efi bootloader? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercurysquad Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 Must I have to use an efi bootloader? Yes. For reducing temperature you can try to decrease the voltage by about 250 mV, at your own risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipolas Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Yes. For reducing temperature you can try to decrease the voltage by about 250 mV, at your own risk. Ok, thanks, but don't forget I have a notebook so I can't change the voltage in the bios, and sysctl -w kern.cputhrottle_curvolt=950 is the minimum I can have So, the temperature is hight because the speedstep doesn't work because I am not using an efi bootloader? I'm going to install an efi bootloader. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiwi Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 I've tweak a little my pstates table, before with acpi got 2states (1000&1500), now 4 (1000&1169&1336&1500), all with the lowest voltage (950mv, or which is seen as 1004 on terminal) Pretty stable, but audio & video stuttering when playback video... I use 9.4 vanilla, will try with my old speedstep... No change with speedstep kernel, stuttering.... Any way to save preference in speedstep app beta ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrheat Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 hi here my results - check my sig for hardware details http://pastebin.com/ma91d66c keep up the good work! regards, mrheat hooray ! with new version and manual plist edit it works now! acpi is ununsable on this machine. same in linux. one question: my merom chip runs stable 0.950 mv at all frequencies, can i enter the same voltage for all frequencies? great work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riley Freeman Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Could someone post an example plist with manual p-state entries? It's not reading the p-states here and I'm completely lost trying to figure out how to find/add them manually. Just need something to work off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer007 Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 my IntelEnhancedSpeedStep output ---> Here my sysctl machdep.cpu && uname -a output ---> Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_de Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Could someone post an example plist with manual p-state entries? It's not reading the p-states here and I'm completely lost trying to figure out how to find/add them manually. Just need something to work off :censored2: Here my: 1398,1864,2330 MHZ / 1164,1228,1308 mV MY CPU E4400 has 3 Pstates (0-2), if you have 4 use one entry more in the Table. ...... KernelFeatures -1 PStateTable 2330 1308 1864 1228 1398 1164 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InferiorYeast Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 WOW! I never thought I would get speedstep working on my laptop as even windows can't read it's acpi tables. Amazing. At one point it reported my voltage as 1404mV (max should be 1260mV) which caused kernel panic if i changed the frequency. That seems to be fixed by forcing it down to 1260mV. One question: at 998mhz it runs at 956mV in windows, but i can only get it to go to 1004mV in osx. so for 998mhz and 1164mhz they both run at 1004mV. Not really a big issue but strange nonetheless. I use my laptop as my desktop so anything to keep it cool is extremely helpful THANK YOU!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercurysquad Posted August 12, 2008 Author Share Posted August 12, 2008 one question: my merom chip runs stable 0.950 mv at all frequencies, can i enter the same voltage for all frequencies? Sure, if it's stable at 950 mV, you can use the same voltage for all frequencies. I would however, try to bump it down to 800 for lower frequencies to get even more power savings and lower temperature. But it's up to you. Ok, thanks, but don't forget I have a notebook so I can't change the voltage in the bios, and sysctl -w kern.cputhrottle_curvolt=950 is the minimum I can haveSo, the temperature is hight because the speedstep doesn't work because I am not using an efi bootloader? I'm going to install an efi bootloader. Thanks From your log output it seems that SpeedStep is working properly. Your processor might be limiting the voltage you can switch to. You can change voltage using sysctl, no need to mess with BIOS. If temperature is still high, it could be due to other reasons (e.g. Spotlight indexing the harddrive when you are away). WOW! I never thought I would get speedstep working on my laptop as even windows can't read it's acpi tables. Amazing. At one point it reported my voltage as 1404mV (max should be 1260mV) which caused kernel panic if i changed the frequency. That seems to be fixed by forcing it down to 1260mV. One question: at 998mhz it runs at 956mV in windows, but i can only get it to go to 1004mV in osx. so for 998mhz and 1164mhz they both run at 1004mV. Not really a big issue but strange nonetheless. I use my laptop as my desktop so anything to keep it cool is extremely helpful THANK YOU!!!! Could you please post which CPU you have (its family, model, stepping)? It seems the kext is detecting your CPU as having 16mV steps instead of 12.5mV steps, thus calculating a higher voltage than it should be. Also, which kernel are you using? To force change the voltages, you can setup your own P-state table as described on the first page and some posts above on this page too. Keep in mind the processor might limit the voltage range, so if you supply a voltage lower than the processor will accept, it will automatically choose the proper lowest voltage. (950mv, or which is seen as 1004 on terminal) No change with speedstep kernel, stuttering.... Any way to save preference in speedstep app beta ? 1) Seems your CPU's voltage steps are being detected incorrectly. Please post your CPU information +family,model,stepping. 2) Stuttering: this should not happen on modern processors with constant_tsc, but in case yours doesn't have constant tsc, you need to use a speedstep kernel. Either use existing ToH kernels (no sleep), or wait for my 9.4 kernel. 3) I can't say about the gui apps, their devs might have more info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InferiorYeast Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Could you please post which CPU you have (its family, model, stepping)? It seems the kext is detecting your CPU as having 16mV steps instead of 12.5mV steps, thus calculating a higher voltage than it should be. Also, which kernel are you using? To force change the voltages, you can setup your own P-state table as described on the first page and some posts above on this page too. Keep in mind the processor might limit the voltage range, so if you supply a voltage lower than the processor will accept, it will automatically choose the proper lowest voltage. Intel Core Duo T2500 (family 6, model 14, stepping 8)<---according to "sysctl machdep.cpu && uname -a". I am using 9.4 vanilla kernel. I have set up my own P-state table based on windows values. Without setting up the P-state table no states are detected. In windows the voltage does go as low as 950mV so i dont think the processor is limiting it. sudo dmesg | grep IntelEnhancedSpeedStep sysctl machdep.cpu && uname -a sysctl -a | grep throttle Thanks again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superhai Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 2) Stuttering: this should not happen on modern processors with constant_tsc, but in case yours doesn't have constant tsc, you need to use a speedstep kernel. Either use existing ToH kernels (no sleep), or wait for my 9.4 kernel. Sometimes the throttlin happens quiet often, and the strain all the IOLog outputs put on the system causes stutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uuid Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 I don't run any other OS than OS X, so if anyone with a Q6600 (G0) could find out whether there are any more PStates besides the reported ones (below), I'd be incredibly thankful =D 8/12/08 11:04:07 AM kernel IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO P-State 0: 2400 MHz at 1564 mV, consuming 88 W, latency 160 usec 8/12/08 11:04:07 AM kernel IntelEnhancedSpeedStep: INFO P-State 1: 1600 MHz at 1564 mV, consuming 56 W, latency 160 usec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclau Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Intel Core Duo T2500 (family 6, model 14, stepping 8)<---according to "sysctl machdep.cpu && uname -a". I am using 9.4 vanilla kernel. I have set up my own P-state table based on windows values. Without setting up the P-state table no states are detected. In windows the voltage does go as low as 950mV so i dont think the processor is limiting it. sudo dmesg | grep IntelEnhancedSpeedStep sysctl machdep.cpu && uname -a sysctl -a | grep throttle Thanks again What software in Windows you use to get the P-state values? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiwi Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 machdep.cpu.address_bits.virtual: 48 machdep.cpu.address_bits.physical: 36 machdep.cpu.cache.size: 2048 machdep.cpu.cache.L2_associativity: 6 machdep.cpu.cache.linesize: 64 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.fixed_width: 40 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.fixed_number: 3 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.events: 0 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.events_number: 7 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.width: 40 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.number: 2 machdep.cpu.arch_perf.version: 2 machdep.cpu.thermal.ACNT_MCNT: 1 machdep.cpu.thermal.thresholds: 2 machdep.cpu.thermal.dynamic_acceleration: 0 machdep.cpu.thermal.sensor: 1 machdep.cpu.mwait.sub_Cstates: 139808 machdep.cpu.mwait.extensions: 3 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_max: 64 machdep.cpu.mwait.linesize_min: 64 machdep.cpu.cores_per_package: 2 machdep.cpu.logical_per_package: 2 machdep.cpu.extfeatures: XD EM64T machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS HTT TM SSE3 MON DSCPL EST TM2 SSSE3 CX16 TPR PDCM machdep.cpu.brand: 0 machdep.cpu.signature: 1789 machdep.cpu.extfeature_bits: 537919488 1 machdep.cpu.feature_bits: -1075053569 58269 machdep.cpu.stepping: 13 machdep.cpu.extfamily: 0 machdep.cpu.extmodel: 0 machdep.cpu.model: 15 machdep.cpu.family: 6 machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5250 @ 1.50GHz machdep.cpu.vendor: GenuineIntel Darwin CaribouZland.local 9.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.4.0: Mon Jun 9 19:30:53 PDT 2008; root:xnu-1228.5.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 1004 is reported by terminal, but Coolbookcontroler report 950mv as it's specified in plist... I've tried with my old speedstep kernel (92) : no change, still stuttering with app Gui and terminal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titooo Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Coolbook is not free.Coolbook only does undervolting, no speedstep Coolbook expects AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement.kext to exist and do the speedstepping work, which most hacks don't have Coolbook doesn't work on a lot of real macs, let alone hackintosh. It doesn't support Pentium4 or M Coolbook assumes 12.5 mV steps regardless of CPU type. Coolbook doesn't send clock recalibration signals to the kernel for CPUs without constant tsc. Coolbook is not developed by a hackintosh user tongue.gif with no sourcecode available ..That's enough for now. I think this kext works better than Coolbook in just about every way, and supports more computers too. The only thing which Coolbook allegedly has over the kext is support for N/2 bus ratio, which I'll add to v1.3 soon so people can go below 1Ghz. But then I've not seen anyone use Coolbook to go below 1Ghz either. It seems enough to convince me that your speestep kext is better than cooolbook. However I bought Coolbook 2 or 3 weeks ago.I used it on my computer just once, so I could give it to you for test if you want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts